首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The recent surge in oil prices to roughly $55 a barrel teaches some useful lessons. One is that surprises happen. A year ago fut
The recent surge in oil prices to roughly $55 a barrel teaches some useful lessons. One is that surprises happen. A year ago fut
admin
2011-02-11
40
问题
The recent surge in oil prices to roughly $55 a barrel teaches some useful lessons. One is that surprises happen. A year ago futures contracts predicted today’s price would be $25. A second is that the economy has grown less vulnerable to oil "shocks". Compared with 1973, we now use almost 50 percent less energy for each dollar of output. New industries (software, theme parks) need less than the old (steel, chemicals). But the largest lesson is depressingly familiar. Americans won’t think realistically about oil. We consider cheap fuel a birthright, and when we don’t get it, we whine—rather than ask why or what we should do.
If prices rise, we blame a conspiracy of greedy oil companies, OPEC or someone. The reality is usually messier. Energy economist Philip Verleger Jr. attributes the present price run-up to massive miscalculation. Oil companies and OPEC underestimated global demand, particularly from China. Since 2001 China’s oil use has jumped 36 percent. This error led OPEC and companies to underinvest in new production capacity, he says. In 2002 the world had 5 million barrels a day of surplus production capacity; now it has little. Unexpected supply interruptions (sabotage in Iraq, civil war in Nigeria) boost prices.
Verleger says prices could go to $60 next year or even $80 if adverse supply conditions persist. No one really knows. Analyst Adam Sieminski of Deutsche Bank thinks prices may retreat to the low $30s in 2005. A slowing Chinese economy could weaken demand. But the uncertainties cannot obscure two stubborn realities. First, world oil production can’t rise forever; dwindling reserves will someday cause declines. And, second, barring miraculous discoveries, more will come from unstable regions—especially the Middle East.
We need to face these realities; neither George Bush nor John Kerry does. Their energy plans are rival fantasies. Kerry pledges to make us "independent" of Middle East oil, mainly through conservation and an emphasis on "renewable" fuels (biomass, solar, wind). Richard Nixon was the first president to promise energy "independence". It couldn’t happen then— and can’t now. The United States imports about 60 percent of its oil. A fifth of imports come from the Persian Gulf. Even if we eliminated Persian Gulf imports, we’d still be vulnerable. Oil scarcities and prices are transmitted worldwide. The global economy—on which we depend—remains hugely in need of Persian Gulf oil.
Bushes pitch is that we can produce our way out of trouble. No such luck. Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, with possible reserves of 10 billion barrels, might provide 1 million barrels a day, or 5 percent of present U.S. demand. Fine. But the practical effect would be to offset some drop in production elsewhere. American oil output peaked in 1970; it’s down 34 percent since then.
A groundbreaking study from the consulting company PFC Energy illuminates our predicament. The world now uses 82 million barrels of oil a day; that’s 30 billion barrels a year. To estimate future production, the study examined historical production and discovery patterns in all the world’s oil fields. The conclusion: The world already uses about 12 billion more barrels a year than it finds. "In almost every mature oil basin, the world has been producing more than it’s finding for close to 20 years," says PFC’s Mike Rodgers. That can’t continue indefinitely.
The study is no doomsday exercise. Rodgers says that future discovery and recovery rates could be better—or worse than assumed. With present rates, he expects global oil supply to peak before 2020 at about 100 million barrels a day. Whatever happens, the world will probably depend more on two shaky regions., the Persian Gulf and the former Soviet Union. The Gulf now supplies a quarter of the world’s oil; PFC projects that to rise to a third in a decade.
Although the future is hazy, what we ought to do isn’t. We need to dampen oil use, expand production and if oil prices recede—significantly increase the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. These steps can’t end our vulnerability to global price surges or the effects of a catastrophic loss of oil supplies from, say, war or terrorism. But they can reduce it. Most important, Americans should curb gasoline use. The Energy Information Administration reports the following: Gasoline represents about 45 percent of U. S. oil demand; since 1991 the explosion of SUVs and light trucks has meant no gains in average fuel mileage efficiency; and over the same period, typical drivers travel almost 1,000 miles more annually.
We should be promoting fuel-efficient vehicles, particularly "hybrids". Combining gasoline and electric power, they get 20 percent to 40 percent better mileage than conventional vehicles, says David’ Greene of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. They also cost from $3,000 to $4,000 more than conventional cars, he says, mainly because they have two power sources. But Greene plausibly asserts that if production expanded, the cost gap would shrink. The way to expand demand would be to adopt a gasoline tax of $1 to $2 a gallon. Americans would know that fuel prices would stay high. They’d have reason to economize.
Of course, a fuel tax is a political showstopper. It isn’t in Bush’s or Kerry’s plan. They promote hydrogen-powered cars. These sound great but—given the technical obstacles— won’t become widespread for many years, if ever. This captures our choice: taking modestly unpleasant preventive steps; or running greater future risks by clinging to our fantasies. History favors our fantasies.
According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true?
选项
A、Nobody knows for sure whether oil prices will go up or down in the future.
B、China’s increasing demand led OPEC to miscalculate production capacity.
C、There has been little gains in average fuel mileage efficiency.
D、The world will depend more on the Persian Gulf in the future.
答案
B
解析
第二段提到石油涨价的原因,主要是由于石油公司和OPEC低估了全球的(包括来自中国的)石油需求,从而导致对于新增产能的投资不足而引起的。选项B的意思是:中国不断增长的需求导致OPEC错估了产量。显然,这是逻辑错误(只能说OPEC错估了中国的需求,才导致产量没有跟上,不能说产量没有跟上的根源在于中国不断增长的需求)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/mIYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Whyshouldanyonebuythelatestvolumeintheever-expandingDictionaryofNationalBiography?Idonotmeanthatitisbad,as
StudyActivitiesinUniversityInordertohelpcollegeanduniversitystudentsintheprocessoflearning,fourkeystudy
StudyActivitiesinUniversityInordertohelpcollegeanduniversitystudentsintheprocessoflearning,fourkeystudy
Besides"American"characteristics—individualism,self-reliance,informality,punctualityanddirectness,therearealsosome"
Identicaltwinspossessexactlythesamesetofgenes.Yetastheygrowolder,theymaybegintodisplaysubtledifferences.The
Identicaltwinspossessexactlythesamesetofgenes.Yetastheygrowolder,theymaybegintodisplaysubtledifferences.The
ThemainriverspartinginBritainrunfrom_______.
A、sufferedseverecasualtiesB、wereontherecentlyissuedlistofterroristsC、foughtwithSaudipoliceforcesD、werethoughtt
DawnaWalterisoneoftheauthorsleadingthewayinBritainwithherbookthatattemptstohowevenatidy【M1】______sockd
InrecentyearsAmericansocietyhasbecomeincreasinglydependentonitsuniversitiestofindsolutionstoitsmajorproblems.
随机试题
假设可以比较准确地估计公司破产的可能性和破产成本。那么这些预期破产成本将由债权人和股东共同承担。()
小儿惊厥最常见的原因是
能区别大肠埃希菌和志贺菌的试验是
关于投融资服务项目质量管理的说法,正确的是()。
中外合资经营企业在所得税后利润要提取()。
下列关于标准成本的表述中,正确的是()。
阿威读初二,13岁,平时学习成绩很不好,家长的训斥让他产生逆反心理,不但不好好学习,而且还出现了逃课、离家出走的现象。他经常与社会上一些小帮派团体混在一起,上个月竟然参与超市偷窃的案件。由于阿威还未成年,没有被刑拘,但在派出所备了案。此时,社会工作者介入,
根据以下资料,回答下列问题。2016年,全国民间固定资产投资为365219亿元,比上年名义增长3.2%,增速比1—11月份提高0.1个百分点,民间固定资产投资占全国固定资产投资的比重为61.2%,比1—11月份降低0.3个百分点,比上年降低3个百
下列选项在习近平总书记发表的2021年新年贺词中没有提到的是:
文君是新世界数码技术有限公司的人事专员,十一过后,公司招聘了一批新员工,需要对他们进行入职培训。人事助理已经制作了一份演示文稿的素材“新员工入职培训.pptx”,请打开该文档进行美化,要求如下:为第六张幻灯片左侧的文字“员工守则”加入超链接,链接到Wo
最新回复
(
0
)