首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical
admin
2013-02-16
78
问题
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical hypothesis is that hypnosis may be the product of "vivid imagination", a now discredited charge stemming from the observation that many people who are hypnotizable can be led to experience compellingly realistic auditory and visual hallucinations. Nothing that an auditory hallucination and the act of imagining a sound are both self-generated and that, like real hearing, a hallucination is experienced as the product of an external source, Henry Szechtman used PET(positron emission tomography)to image the brain activity of hypnotized subjects invited to imagine a scenario and then experiencing a hallucination. By monitoring regional blood flow in areas activated during both hearing and auditory hallucination but not during simple imagining, the investigators sought to determine where in the brain a hallucinated sound is mistakenly "tagged" as authentic and originating in the outside world.
Szechtman imaged the brain activity of eight very hypnotizable subjects who had been prescreened for their ability to hallucinate under hypnosis. During the session, the subjects were under hypnosis and lay in the PET scanner with their brain activity being monitored under four conditions: at rest;while hearing an audiotape of a voice, while imagining hearing the voice again;and during the auditory hallucination they experienced after being informed that the tape was playing once more, although it was not. The tests suggested that a region of the brain called the right anterior cingulate cortex was just as active while the volunteers were hallucinating as it was while they were actually hearing the stimulus. In contrast, that brain area remained dormant while the subjects were imagining that they heard the stimulus.
The second major objection raised by critics argues that hypnosis’ ability to blunt pain results from either simple relaxation or a placebo response. McGlashan established that while hypnosis was only as effective in reducing pain as a sugar pill for poorly hypnotizable people, highly hypnotizable subjects benefited three times more from hypnosis than from the placebo. In response to these successes, Rainville devised experiments to determine which brain structures are involved in pain relief during hypnosis, attempting to locate the brain structures associated with the suffering component of pain, as distinct from its sensory aspects. Using PET, he and other scientists found that hypnosis reduced the activity of the anterior cingulate cortex—an area known to be involved in pain—but did not affect the activity of the somatosensory cortex, where the sensations of pain are processed.
Despite the value of these findings, the mechanisms underlying hypnotic pain relief are still poorly understood. The model favored by most researchers is that the analgesic effect of hypnosis occurs in higher brain centers than those involved in registering the painful sensation, accounting for the fact that most autonomic responses that routinely accompany pain—such as increased heart rate — are relatively unaffected by hypnotic suggestions of analgesia.
The research described in the passage is primarily concerned with answering which of the following questions?
选项
A、What research guarantees the reality of the effects that hypnosis has on brain activity, and what is their causal mechanism?
B、How are experiments devoted to disproving the "vivid imagination" objection to hypnosis different from those devoted to disproving the "placebo effect" thesis?
C、How can researchers reproduce the useful effects of hypnosis in a medical setting?
D、What technical advances have permitted researchers to reject skeptical explanations of the phenomenon of hypnosis?
答案
C
解析
内容理解题。问的是文章主要回答了哪些问题。根据原文,第二段讲了催眠对大脑活动的作用;第三段讲了催眠止痛的大脑机制问题。所以正确答案是C选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/mEmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Ithasbeenchallengingformosttwentieth-centuryAmericanpolicy-makerstorecapturethememoryoftheearlyUnitedStates,Con
FoodanddrinkplayamajorroleinChristmascelebrationsinmostcountries,butinfewmoresothaninMexico.Manyfamilies
Whatdoconsumersreallywant?That’saquestionmarketresearcherswouldlovetoanswer.Butsincepeopledon’talwayssaywhat
Formostofus,theworkisthecentral,dominatingfactoflife.Wespendmorethanhalfourconscioushoursatwork,preparing
"Youareveryselfish.It’shightimeyou______thatyouarenotthemostimportantpersonintheworld,"Edgarsaidtohisbos
WhatMakesa"MillennialMind"?(1)Since1000AD,around30billionpeoplehavebeenbornonourplanet.Thevastmajorityh
Tounderstandhowastrologyworks,weshouldfirsttakeaquicklookatthesky.Althoughfilestarsareatenormousdistances,
Itisnotoftenrealizedthatwomen【1】ahighplaceinsouthernEuropeansocietiesinthe10thand11thcenturies.Asa【2】,thew
Itisnotoftenrealizedthatwomen【1】ahighplaceinsouthernEuropeansocietiesinthe10thand11thcenturies.Asa【2】,thew
Howeverimportantwemayregardschoollifetobe,thereisnogainsayingthefactthatchildrenspendmoretimeathomethani
随机试题
试分析二阶系统在不同阻尼下特征根的形式和位置分布及其对应的阶跃响应曲线的形状。
论述毛泽东思想形成和发展的社会历史条件是什么。
45岁妇女,性交后出血就诊。检查宫颈中度糜烂,子宫正常大小、活动,宫旁(-),宫颈刮片巴氏Ⅲ级。若证实为镜下早期浸润癌,首选的手术是
下列哪项防尘技术改革是不能根除粉尘危害的措施
大黄与芒硝合用,属于哪种配伍关系
背景:某汽车模具厂厂房工程,建筑面积6000m2,地上2层,首层层高13m,二层层高3.6m。独立柱基础,现浇混凝土框架结构,首层结构柱一次浇筑。工期200日历天,由于工期紧张,现场需要多点交叉施工。施工过程中发生了如下事件:
适应障碍在发病时间上的特点是()。
市场上一些经营者滥用市场支配地位垄断价格、强制交易,出现形形色色的限制竞争的行为。反垄断法是保护市场竞争,防止和制止垄断行为,维护市场秩序的重要法律制度。反垄断,保护竞争有利于()。
(62)可用于描述数据流图中数据存储及其之间的关系,最初用于数据库概念设计。
目前常用的3.5共寸软盘角上有一带黑滑块的小方口,当小方口被关闭时,作用是
最新回复
(
0
)