首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
admin
2013-08-12
42
问题
Whose Grave is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A)
hen Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.(B)
he tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.(C)
Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.(D)
There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable?
From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance.
Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself.
Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come(while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves).
The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up.
In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
Which of the following can be inferred from Paragraph 4 about the power of the curse of the Pharaoh’s tomb?
选项
A、It is supported by science.
B、It is a rumor denied by fact.
C、It is still a myth until today.
D、It does punish the disturbing people.
答案
B
解析
本题为推论题。题目问:关于第四段所提到的诅咒的力量,可以作出以下哪一项推论?根据本段,Carter团队中的一些人的意外死亡似乎应验了这一诅咒,但是Carter却在多年以后平静地去世。所以,这证明了谣言并不正确,已经被事实所否定,因此选B项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/ihfO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Completetheformbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completetheexplanationoftheroomnumber.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Betweenwhattimesistheroadtrafficlightest?
Choosethecorrectletter,A,BorC.CourseFeedbackAftershegaveherpresentation,Hirokofelt
Bilingualismcanbedefinedashavinganequallevelofcommunicative______intwoormorelanguages.
Choosethecorrectletter,A,BorC.MuseumofAnthropologyThemuseumisfamousforitscollectionofculturalitemsfrom
Whatdoesthepassagemainlydiscuss?WhendoesthepassagesuggestthatancientEgyptianhieroglyptticscriptwasfinallydeci
AMessengerfromthePastHispeoplesaidgood-byeandwatchedhimwalkofftowardthemountains.Theyhadlittlereasonto
AMessengerfromthePastHispeoplesaidgood-byeandwatchedhimwalkofftowardthemountains.Theyhadlittlereasonto
AMessengerfromthePastHispeoplesaidgood-byeandwatchedhimwalkofftowardthemountains.Theyhadlittlereasonto
随机试题
有利于铸件凝固补缩的内浇道开设位置说法错误的是()。
治疗原发性肾病综合征的首选药物是
呼吸链中能直接将电子传递给氧的成分是
A.祛风湿,利关节,解毒B.祛风湿,止痛,利水消肿C.祛风湿,止痛,解表D.祛风湿,通络止痛,消骨鲠E.祛风湿,活血通络,清肺化痰独活的功效是
女性,16岁,1周来尿少、色红,眼睑、下肢浮肿,血压20/14kPa(150/105mmHg),尿蛋白(++),尿沉渣红细胞10~15个/HP,白细胞5~10个/高倍视野,可见红细胞及颗粒管型,血红蛋白12g/dl,A/G4.0/2.2,胆固醇5mmol/
血管扩张药及钙拮抗剂β-受体阻滞剂
项目投资项编码应综合考虑_______、合同价和工程款的支付等因素,建立统一的编码。()
资产负债率的含义正确的是()。
李氏夫妇目前都是50岁左右,有一个儿子在读大学,拥有定期和活期储蓄共40万元,夫妇俩准备65岁时退休。根据生命周期理论,理财客户经理给出的下列理财分析和建议,不恰当的是()。
设总体X在区间[0,θ]上服从均匀分布,X1,X2,…Xn取自总体X的简单随机样本,,X(n)=max(X1,…,Xn).(I)求θ的矩估计量和最大似然估计量;(Ⅱ)求常数a,b,使均为θ的无偏估计,并比较其有效性;(Ⅲ)应用切比雪夫不等式证明:均
最新回复
(
0
)