首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we’re interested in paying our bills, it’s time to unmask the true cause of
As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we’re interested in paying our bills, it’s time to unmask the true cause of
admin
2015-01-10
70
问题
As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we’re interested in paying our bills, it’s time to unmask the true cause of our dysfunction; Neither Republicans nor Democrats are ultimately to blame. Instead, the problem lies at the antiquated core of the world’s oldest, creakiest democracy. More specifically, we must abolish that most heinous of institutions, the Electoral College. I’m not sure I’ve ever met anyone with a kind word to say about the College, a seemingly vestigial group that meets every four years to formally elect the president we all already voted for. Other countries with well-functioning governments have similar mysterious organs in place(call them the tonsils of democracy), but with a crucial difference: We’re the only nation on Earth to continue electing an executive president, as opposed to a figurehead, in this fashion.
Why is this such a problem? I present you with Exhibit A: whatever’s currently on the front page of today’s Tribune; Exhibit B: yesterday’s front page; Exhibit C: tomorrow’s; etc, etc. The slow-motion brain-flatulence of a government shutdown is a perfect example of the problems inherent to divided government, where two co-equal branches are pitted against one another, run by opposing leaders with no incentive to compromise. This paralysis is an inevitable outcome of a system dominated by two ideologically distinct parties, elected separately to three institutions meant to check and balance each other.
And yet, a simple tweak could dramatically decrease the odds of this division reoccurring, without requiring any major changes to our Constitution. Merely replacing the members of the Electoral College with the House of Representatives would ensure that, at least half the time, the president and the House were in alignment—and if we reformed the redistricting process to ensure truly democratic congressional elections, our government would function even more smoothly.
In this scenario, every four years, voters would elect congresspeople who would then elect a president, similar to how parliamentary systems choose a prime minister. In those elections, congressional races would function as a proxy for the presidential race—as they largely do already. Congressional elections have become nationalized, as most candidates align themselves with their party’s presidential nominee and run on national issues like the budget, gun control and health care, so this would be no great change.
There would still be a chance for gridlock, of course—for one thing, the Senate is left entirely out of this equation. In off-year elections, it’s possible that the president’s party would lose a majority in the House, ensuring the same divided government we have today. But such division would be guaranteed to end after two years, a fact that would dramatically alter the incentives for congressional leaders.
It’s certainly true that this alone isn’t a very dramatic reform, and that as long as we’re talking about constitutional amendments, why not go all-out and adopt a parliamentary system like most well-functioning Western governments? That might be a great idea, and political scientists have long noted that presidential systems have a pretty terrible track record, with America being the sole exception to an otherwise unbroken string of failures. But it just doesn’t seem politically possible to attempt such a wholesale revamp of our governance structure, particularly since the mere ratification of a constitutional amendment hasn’t happened in 21 years.
There is one objection to this idea that I take very seriously, however. Do we really feel comfortable putting the election of the president in the hands of America’ s most despised political institution, the House of Representatives? As currently constructed, of course not. For one thing, in 2012, Democrats won more than 1. 7 million more votes than Republicans in the House, and yet Republicans retained a 17-seat majority. That imbalance is antithetical to any democratic ideal, and it has to be fixed, whether or not we also allow the House to elect the president.
The solution that strikes me as the most reasonable is to inaugurate a national, nonpartisan redistricting agency, modeled on the one in place and working well in Iowa. That agency uses impartial software to automatically generate district lines that disregard all factors except population, boundaries then subject to approval by the legislature and governor. In Illinois, by contrast, a bipartisan committee draws those lines and, if the four Republicans and four Democrats on the committee can’t agree on a map, a ninth member is chosen by drawing a name from a replica of Abraham Lincoln’s hat. I wish I was kidding about that last bit. If our government is so badly broken that it all comes down to an idea seemingly stolen from a Harry Potter novel, is it any surprise that it can’t do its job?
Why does the author suggest replacing the members of the Electoral College with the House of Representatives? What is the problem with this remedy?
选项
答案
according to the author/if it is replaced by the latter/at least half the time of one term of the president/the president and the the House would be "in alignment"/if the redistricting process were reformed/to ensure truly democratic congressional elections/the government would function more smoothly/the problem; the House of Representatives is America’ s "most despised political institution"/the Americans do not have confidence in it(will surely not "feel comfortable" about it)/and the imbalance of the representatives of the two parties is opposite to ,"any democratic ideal"
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/iDSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Uponcompletinghisexaminationoverthepatient,thedoctorofferedhisjudgmentofherconditions.
His________behaviormadeeveryonenervous.Hewasalwaysrushingtoopendoorsandperformothersmalltasks,apologizingunnece
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
Amanwhopubliclysayssomethingdefamatoryaboutsomeoneisrefferedtoasadrover,weshouldbecarefulaboutthissortofm
ThehappiestpeopleintheworldmayliveinScandinavia,anewstudysuggests.That’saccordingtotheUnitedNationsGeneralA
ThehappiestpeopleintheworldmayliveinScandinavia,anewstudysuggests.That’saccordingtotheUnitedNationsGeneralA
WewillshowhowtheInternationalOlympicshavecommercializedinternationally,andarefinancedfromcorporateandprivatespo
随机试题
甲某是某市土商局局长,因为急于筹集一笔巨额购房款,遂对乙某、丙某谎称能为其开办公司提供方便,乙某、丙某等人立即表示“心意”送上财物价值30万余元。下列说法正确的是()
A、黄连B、黄芩C、地骨皮D、石膏E、银柴胡既能清肺热,又能清湿热的药物是()
下列属于防水材料的有()。
[背景资料]某水闸工程建于土基上,共10孔,每孔净宽10m;上游钢筋混凝土铺盖顺水流方向长15m,垂直水流方向共分成10块,铺盖部位的两侧翼墙亦为钢筋混凝土结构,挡土高度为12m,其平面布置示意图见图2F320060—2。上游翼墙及铺盖施工时,为加快
企业一定时期内发生现金流量分为以下三类()。
物业服务企业运用计算机技术参与具体事务的管理需要综合考虑的因素包括()
下列选项中,是心理学研究对象的是()
解放思想
阅读以下说明,回答问题1至问题5,将解答填入答题纸对应的解答栏内。【说明】某学校拥有内部数据库服务器1台,邮件服务器1台,DHCP服务器1台,FTP服务器1台,流媒体服务器1台,Web服务器1台。要求为所有的学生宿舍提供有线网络接入服务,对外提
Nowthatyouarelgyearsold,youshouldbe(responsibility)______foryourself.
最新回复
(
0
)