首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2014-01-07
74
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT
选项
A、political power.
B、high fares.
C、economic loss.
D、indifference.
答案
C
解析
本题的相关信息在最后一段。A、B、D都被提到,只有C的内容未被提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/hfFK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Depressingreportsabouthowquicklytheworld’stropicalforestsarebeingfelledarecommonplace.Butdepressingreportsabout
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofa(n)【C1】______shouldbema
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofa(n)【C1】______shouldbema
BilingualeducationiscontroversialintheUnitedStates.【C1】______,agrowingbodyofresearchshowsthat【C2】______speakingtw
Inthissurvey,wecangetallthefollowinginformationEXCEPT
Whydoesthewomansaythe"dinner"questionistough?
TherateofHIV/AIDSinfectioninWashingtonDC
Shereallywantedtosaysomethingatthemeeting,buteventually______fromit.
Fromheat-hazeandsummersmogtooutsizehailstonesandflashfloods:moretopsyturvyweatherisontheway,Britain’sforecast
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,buthistoryshowstheycanalsobehighlyeffective.
随机试题
Ifyouarelikemostpeople,yourintelligencevariesfromseasontoseason.Youareprobablyalotsharperinthespringthany
前列腺癌的声像图描述正确的是
川乌的使用注意有
冬期施工的水泥混凝土面板,弯拉强度和抗压强度分别低于()时,严禁受冻。
企业内部控制的目标主要包括:合理保证企业经营管理合法合规、资产安全、财务报表及相关信息真实完整,提高经营效率和效果,促进企业实现发展战略。()
材料:以下是某教师讲解“细胞器——系统内的分工合作”的课堂实录片段。教师讲完分泌蛋白的合成过程后,拿出事先准备好的道具,准备请学生上讲台扮演分泌蛋白的合成及分泌过程。提出问题:假如请同学们来扮演各种角色,一共需要请几名同学上台扮演?每名同学的职责是什
民惟邦本,本固邦宁。政府工作的根本目的,是让全体人民过上好日子。保障群众基本生活,不断提高人民生活水平和质量。其中,()是民生之基。
软件维护是指系统交付使用后对软件所做的改变,以下Ⅰ.改正程序中存在的错误和不足Ⅱ.使软件能适应新的软、硬件环境Ⅲ.增加新的应用内容和功能哪个(些)是需要进行软件维护的原因?()
安全单向散列函数不具备的特性是( )
Ithinkthestoryisnotas______asthatone.
最新回复
(
0
)