2. 考研
  3. It never rains but it pours. Just as bosses and boards had finally sorted out their worst accounting and compliance troubles, an

It never rains but it pours. Just as bosses and boards had finally sorted out their worst accounting and compliance troubles, an

admin2020-03-31  17
问题     It never rains but it pours. Just as bosses and boards had finally sorted out their worst accounting and compliance troubles, and beefed up their feeble corporate governance, a new problem threatens to earn them—especially in America—the sort of nasty headlines that inevitably lead to heads rolling in the executive suite: data insecurity. Left, until now, to low-level IT staff to put right, and seen as a concern only of data-rich industries such as banking, telecoms and air travel, information protection is now high on the boss’s agenda in businesses of every variety.
    Such contented self-satisfaction may have been encouraged—though not justified—by the lack of legal penalty for data leakage. Until California recently passed a law, American firms did not have to tell anyone, even the victim, when data went astray. "Boards should pay as much attention to these IT operational risks as they do to other operational risks in the firm," argues George Westerman of the MIT Sloan School of Management. After all, boards have audit committees and compensation committees. It may be time for a data-protection committee, he argues. Bosses must ensure that there are effective data risk-management processes in place, be aware of their greatest vulnerabilities and promote a corporate culture that acknowledges data risks rather than hides them.
    But the problem is often a lack of understanding by senior managers not just of technology but of business processes, says Thomas Parenty, author of Digital Defense: What You Should Know About Protecting Your Company’s Assets. "No one in the organisation bothers to look at the value of what data they hold, the consequences if something bad happens to it, and the appropriate mechanisms to prevent that from happening," he says.
    So, what should a boss do? Accountancy firms and consultants are already spotting a chance to profit by conducting an independent security and privacy audit—and for many firms, their(no doubt)huge fee will probably be worth the money. The auditors inspect technology systems, data flow and the controls on access to data within an organisation and with its business partners.
    A wise boss will also appoint a senior executive to be responsible for data security—and not just to have a convenient scapegoat in the event of a leak. Diana Glassman, a data protection expert, says that a useful first step would be for the boss to write to all employees reminding them of the risks and potential cost of data leakage, and asking them, before passing data to anyone else, to question whether that person truly needs, or is entitled to, it.
As far as America is concerned, what is special about California’s new law?
选项 A、Companies have to pay when they lose data.
B、Companies have to tell people when they lose data.
C、Bosses must form data protection committees.
D、Companies cannot hold data they do not use.
答案B
解析 属推断题。California’s new law出现在文中第二段，该段第二句讲到在California’snew law颁布之前，即便是数据泄漏了，公司也没必要告知其他人，甚至连受害人都不用告知。从这句话我们可以推断出California’s new law的颁布是对以往这一状况的改变，因此答案为B。其他纯属编造。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/h91Z777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)