首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
admin
2021-06-06
83
问题
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same. That is, we marry the wrong person. So here is the question, why will we marry the wrong person?
For most of recorded history, people married for logical sorts of reasons: because her parcel of land adjoined yours, his family had a flourishing business, her father was the magistrate in town, there was a castle to keep up, or both sets of parents subscribed to the same interpretation of a holy text. And from such reasonable marriages, there flowed loneliness, infidelity, abuse, hardness of heart and screams heard through the nursery doors. The marriage of reason was not, in hindsight, reasonable at all; it was often expedient, narrow-minded, snobbish and exploitative. That is why what has replaced it—the marriage of feeling—has largely been spared the need to account for itself.
What matters in the marriage of feeling is that two people are drawn to each other by an overwhelming instinct and know in their hearts that it is right. Indeed, the more imprudent a marriage appears (perhaps it’s been only six months since they met; one of them has no job or both are barely out of their teens), the safer it can feel.
But though we believe ourselves to be seeking happiness in marriage, it isn’t that simple. What we really seek is familiarity—which may well complicate any plans we might have had for happiness. We are looking to recreate, within our adult relationships, the feelings we knew so well in childhood. The love most of us will have tasted early on was often confused with other more destructive dynamics: feelings of wanting to help an adult who was out of control, of being deprived of a parent’s warmth or scared of his anger, of not feeling secure enough to communicate our wishes. How logical, then, that we should as grown-ups find ourselves rejecting certain candidates for marriage not because they are wrong but because they are too right—too balanced, mature, understanding and reliable—given that in our hearts, such Tightness feels foreign. We marry the wrong people because we don’t associate being loved with feeling of happiness.
Finally, we marry to make a nice feeling permanent. We imagine that marriage will help us to bottle the joy we felt when the thought of proposing first came to us: Perhaps we were in Venice, on the lagoon, in a motorboat, with the evening sun throwing glitter across the sea, chatting about aspects of our souls no one ever seemed to have grasped before, with the prospect of dinner in a risotto place a little later. We married to make such sensations permanent but failed to see that there was no solid connection between these feelings and the institution of marriage.
The good news is that it doesn’t matter if we find we have married the wrong person. We mustn’t abandon him or her, only the founding romantic idea upon which the Western understanding of marriage has been based the last 250 years: that a perfect being exists who can meet all our needs and satisfy our every yearning. We need to swap the romantic view for a tragic (and at points comedic) awareness that every human will frustrate, anger, annoy, madden and disappoint us—and we will (without any malice)
do the same to them
.
The person who is best suited to us is not the person who shares our every taste (he or she doesn’t exist), but the person who can negotiate differences in taste intelligently—the person who is good at disagreement. Rather than some notional idea of perfect complementarity, it is the capacity to tolerate differences with generosity that is the true marker of the "not overly wrong" person. Compatibility is an achievement of love; it must not be its precondition.
Which of the following is typical of the marriage of feeling?
选项
A、Being unable to support oneself.
B、Having a sensible compassion.
C、Being attracted to each other.
D、Seeking a perfect match.
答案
C
解析
细节题。A项“不能自力更生”,B项“有一种理智的同情”,C项“被互相吸引”,D项“追求般配”。根据第三段中的“What matters in the marriage of feeling is that two people are drawn to each other by an overwhelming instinct and know in their hearts that it is right”可知,在建立于感情基础上的婚姻中,重要的是双方被一种无法抗拒的直觉相互吸引。故本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/gZjD777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
一名美国入境游客,免税烟草制品限量是()。
在带团工作前,导游领队人员应熟悉团队成员、旅游产品、旅游目的地的基本情况,为恰当引导旅游者做好准备,这是()的要求。
有声音而无固定语义的语言指的是()。
Whichofthefollowingdescribesthefunctionofthesentence"Itisaniceday,isn’tit?"?
Waitrosehasunveileditsvisionofenvironmentallyconsciousshopping,offeringcustomersthechancetobuyfoodanddrinkthat
Davidtookatestandhisscorewasatthetop10percentinhisclass.Thisisaninterpretationoftheresultofa_________tes
TelevisionhastransformedpoliticsintheUnitedStatesbychangingthewayinwhichinformationisdisseminated,byalteringp
_________aimstohelpstudentstopayattentiontoteachingcontentefficientlyatthebeginningoftheclass.
Childrenwhospendmorethantwohoursadayatacomputerorwatchingtelevisionaremorelikelythanotherstohavementalpro
随机试题
人民警察依法使用武器,造成不应有的人员伤亡的,应当承担赔偿责任。
以“中图法”为依据的出版物发行分类,《科学社会主义理论》应归人()类目。
《旧约.创世纪》中上帝从男人的身上取下了什么东西造出了女人()
A.好发于前臂或小腿石膏包扎过紧时B.石膏固定压迫,皮肤脱屑、出汗和瘙痒,继而水疱破溃感染C.大量钙盐从骨骼中进入血液,并从肾中排出D.若上腹部包裹过紧,进食后可呕吐胃内容物E.长期固定肢体后,关节内外组织发生纤维粘连,同时关节囊和周围肌肉挛缩
CIM+T细胞低于多少时,则发生MDS
肾气丸与六味地黄丸共有的主治病证是参苓白术散与痛泻要方共有的主治病证是
(2010年多项选择第60题)下列各项资产中,属于现金流量表中“现金”内容的有()。
根据《注册建造师执业管理办法(试行)》的规定,注册建造师不得有下列行为()。
根据《商标法》的规定,下列选项中,不得作为注册商标的有()。
票据无因性是指票据因一定的基础关系(如买卖、赠与)产生以后,票据上的权利、义务关系即与生产或转让票据的原因关系相分离。票据的持有人不必证明其取得票据的原因,只需根据票据上所记载的内容就可以请求给付一定的金额,但非法取得票据的除外。根据上述定义,下列选项不属
最新回复
(
0
)