首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The relentless march of technology into everyday life has always given rise to debate about whether it is a good or a bad thing.
The relentless march of technology into everyday life has always given rise to debate about whether it is a good or a bad thing.
admin
2014-09-05
67
问题
The relentless march of technology into everyday life has always given rise to debate about whether it is a good or a bad thing. Some believe that the Internet and computer software are making humans more stupid or shallow. But others argue that computer programs in the form of video games can make people smarter or improve specific skills, such as spatial awareness.
Shawn Green and Alexandre Pouget, from the University of Rochester, in New York state, set out to find an answer. Their study, reported in Current Biology, involved a number of experiments. In one,the participants had to watch 12 dots moving randomly on a screen and quickly assess their aggregate direction of movement. Another test asked participants to work out the direction of specific sounds embedded within stereo white noise. In both tests the video-gamers did better. However, the scientists were aware that gamers could have been born with improved abilities to perform such tasks,which were possibly what attracted them to gaming in the first place. Consequently, a third test was necessary to see if these abilities could have been learnt.
The non-gaming volunteers were put through 50 hours of video-game training. For some this involved playing fast-action shoot-’em-up games such as " Call of Duty 2 " and " Unreal Tournament" , but others were given a slow-moving life-strategy game, "The Sims 2". The researchers found that those trained with action games raised their performance to the level of the experienced gamers. Moreover, they were more efficient in their use of visual or auditory evidence than those playing with the Sims.
The researchers conclude that fast action video-games players develop an enhanced sensitivity to what is going on around them and that this may help with activities such as multitasking, driving, reading small print, navigation and keeping track of friends or children in a crowd. The precise neural mechanism for this effect, however, is still unknown.
What is known is that people make decisions based on probabilities that are constantly being calculated and refined in their heads—something called "probabilistic inference". The brain collects small pieces of information, eventually gathering enough to make an accurate decision. When driving a car, for example, many probabilities will be collated to make decisions such as whether or not to brake. The more efficient someone is at collecting visual and auditory information, the faster he can reach the threshold needed to make a decision.
Shawn Green, Alexandre Pouget suggest that reaction times in the population will probably improve with the rise of fast-action video-games. There are a lot of players: last year a report estimated that 67% of American households contained at least one video-gamer. And if video-gamers are really better equipped to make quick decisions, they might also turn out to be better drivers and end up in fewer accidents. However, the notion that gamers acquire some minor physical skills may not pacify concerned parents. What,after all,of the skills they are not acquiring when shooting virtual cops instead of reading or talking?
The problem of first two experiments lies in that______.
选项
A、they are too simple to support researchers’ assumption
B、they do lead to unambiguous conclusion
C、they focus on irrelevant skills of participants
D、they do not seperate video-gamers from non-gamers
答案
B
解析
科学家一共做了三个实验,想要证明玩游戏对于人的感知能力的提升有没有帮助。因为前两个实验存在一定的问题,才展开了第三项实验。第二段具体介绍了前两个实验。首先介绍了实验的经过,通过实验安排考察了受试者对方向和声音信息的敏感度。实验结果表明,游戏玩家在这两方面都更胜一筹。但是转折词However后面这句话却指出,游戏玩家虽然表现出色,但是无法判断他们这种能力到底是天生的还是后天通过游戏锻炼的,因此这两个实验并没有得出能够验证科学家设想的结论,实验失败。[B]正确。[A]纯属臆断。[C]错误,这两个实验考察的是受试者的方向和听觉敏感度,是相关技能,并非无关技能。[D]错误,因为实验本身设计逻辑存在漏洞,即使将游戏玩家和非游戏玩家分开进行实验,实验结果仍然是无法确定的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/gJK4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Decisionscanbemadequickly,ortheycanbemadeaftercarefulthought.Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?
Writeanessayof160-200wordsbasedonthefollowingdrawing.Inyouressay,youshouldfirstdescribethedrawing,theninter
Inthefollowingtext,somesentenceshavebeenremoved.ForQuestions41-45,choosethemostsuitableonefromthelist(A、B、C、
Thequestionofwhetherwarisinevitableisonewhichhasconcernedmanyoftheworld’sgreatwriters.Beforeconsideringthis
Ahospitalisaninstitutionthatprovidesmedicalservicesforacommunity.Thedoctors,nurses,andotherpersonnelofahospi
Ithasbeenjustlysaidthatwhile"wespeakwithourvocalorganswe【B1】______withourwholebodies."Allofuscommunicatew
Ithasbeenjustlysaidthatwhile"wespeakwithourvocalorganswe【B1】______withourwholebodies."Allofuscommunicatew
Ithasbeenjustlysaidthatwhile"wespeakwithourvocalorganswe【B1】______withourwholebodies."Allofuscommunicatew
随机试题
食管痛和胃癌后期,癌细胞可转移至:
阴道前壁长()
北京甲企业与法国乙公司拟设立一中外合资企业丙,在谈判过程中,双方对该中外合资企业的出资方式、股权分配、组织机构安排等事项进行了约定。则下述的种种约定,哪些不符合我国相关法律规定?()
从业人员进行营销活动的基本出发点,开发客户的首要环节是()。
损伤大脑颞叶最有可能是使伤者不能从事()职业。
请认真阅读下文,并按要求作答。一个小村庄的故事在一片河坡上,早先有过一个美丽的村庄。村子里住着几十户人家,家家都有一两把锋利的斧头,谁家想盖房,谁家想造犁,就拎起斧头到山坡上
市场机制中的核心机制是()。
心理学家德西1971年做了一项著名的心理实验。他让一些学生解答妙趣横生的智力难题。开始,对所有学生都不奖励。接着把他们分成两组,其中一组学生,每解答完一道智力难题就给予一定的奖励,另一组学生不给任何奖励。随后在两组学生的休息或自由活动时间里,实验者观察发现
设g(x)二阶可导,且f(x)=求常数a的值,使得f(x)在x=0处连续。
Therelationshipbetweenhumananddogdatesbacktoatleast8,000yearsago.Differenttypesofdogsweredevelopedfordiffer
最新回复
(
0
)