首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
admin
2010-03-25
69
问题
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly. all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story. ) In each case investors -- mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans -- all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a Combined banking and currency crisis: a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice; a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long term assets into cash, but to convert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge, inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupt; if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probably go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries split the difference -- and paid a heavy price regardless.
Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management? Like most cliches, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real: excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure of Asian business also made the economies peculiarly vulnerable to a loss of confidence. But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time.
Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the right track? There was frantic blame-shifting when everything in Asia seemed to be going wrong; now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right. The International Monetary Fund points to Korea’s recovery -- and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all -- as proof that its policy recommendations were right. Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia- which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls -- also seems to be on the mend. Malaysia’s Prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news -- even though neighbouring economies also seem to have bottomed out.
The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the policies adopted either on or in defiance Of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way. Budget policies, interest rate policies, banking reform -- whatever countries tried, just about all the capital that could flee, did. And when there was no more money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail. At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner; at worst, they were like medieval physicians who. prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills.
Will the patients stage a full recovery? It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level; but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korean industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as the Asian norm, they have a long way to go.
"Pundits" in the first paragraph is closest in meaning to
选项
A、economists.
B、bankers.
C、industrialists.
D、financiers.
答案
A
解析
这是道词汇推断题。根据上下文,pundits在文中指经济学家。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/gEqO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、Irrigatingdesertareas.B、Usesforcoldseawater.C、TechniquesforpreservingtheenvironmentD、Theimportanceofconserving
Howmanyreallysufferasaresultoflabormarketproblems?Thisisoneofthemostcriticalyetcontentioussocialpolicyques
A、MarkadmittedthatMonicawasright,whensheprovidedenoughevidence.B、MarkdeniedthatMonicawasright,regardlessofher
ChineseAmericanstodayhavehigherincomesthanAmericansingeneralandhigheroccupationalstatus.TheChinesehaverisento
A、Sincetherearemorejobsavailable,morestudentschoosecomputerscienceastheirmajor.B、Therearenotenoughgradsqualif
Howeverattractivethefiguresmaylookonpaper,inthelongrunthesuccessorfailureofamergerdependsonthehumanfactor
A、Becausehedoesnotthinkitisworthwhiletohislife.B、Becausehedoesnotbelieveinthosetelevisionprograms.C、Because
A、MostreviewsaboutthemoviesmadeinChinaaresuperficial.B、OnlyasmallnumberoftheChinesefilmsareexportedoverseas.
Speakingtwolanguagesratherthanjustonehasobviouspracticalbenefitsinanincreasinglyglobalizedworld.Butinrecentye
Thesedayssearchingforanumber【C1】______telephonedirectoryseemsveryold-fashioned.Voicerecognitionsystemsarebecoming
随机试题
金融工具的特征。
主要用来测量人们对观念、事物或他人的感觉的量表是()
职能制组织结构形式的优点是实现了()
患者,女性,26岁。妊娠39周,在做产后乳房护理时,不正确的指导是
A.修复体与牙体完全密合B.修复体的轴壁不能与牙体完全密合C.修复体邻面接触点不能密合D.修复体强度较差E.修复体能恢复良好的天然牙锤造全冠的特点是
背景资料:某公司承接了某城市道路的改扩建工程。工程中包含一段长240m的新增路线(含下水道200m)和一段长220m的路面改造(含下水道200m),另需拆除一座旧的人行天桥,新建一座立交桥。工程位于城市繁华地带,建筑物多,地下管网密集,交通量大。
关于财务净现值率正确的叙述是( )。
某公司年终利润分配前的股东权益项目资料如下:公司股票的每股现行市价为35元,每股收益为3.5元。要求计算回答下述四个互不相关的问题:(1)计划按每10股送1股的方案发放股票股利,并按发放股票股利后的股数派发每股现金股利0.2元,股票股利的金额按现行
在对A公司2006年7月1日与U商业银行签订的借款合同及所涉及的财务会计规定遵循情况审计后,在出具的审计报告的意见段中使用了“在审计过程中我们发现,除了没有按照借款合同的规定随时保持不低于100万元价值的存货这一情况外,贵公司所有重大方面遵循了与U商业银行
WhatkindofanimalsisAnnaaskedtolookafter?
最新回复
(
0
)