首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
63
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that______.
选项
A、many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
B、students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
C、students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
D、many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
答案
A
解析
参考文章第二段,其中用了两个argue,表明作者认为许多教师是反对由学生评判自己的教课水平的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/f6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
TheIndian’Oceanisthethirdlargestoceanintheworld.OnlythePacificandtheAtlanticarelarger.Morethanone-fifthof
FireandWaterShundagarhisavillageonIndia’seast-facingcoast.Itisavillageofsimplemudandgrasshousesbuilton
CalifornianMichaelSchwabesaidgoodbyetothegaspumptwoyearsago.Heleasedanelectriccar.Schwabesayshegetsmoreout
Eversincehumanshaveliveontheearth,theyhavemadeuseofvariousformsofcommunication.Generally,thisexpressionofth
Parentshavetodomuchlessfortheirchildrenthantheyusedtodo,andhomehasbecomemuchlessofaworkshop.Clothescanb
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
Shoppingforclothesisnotthesameexperienceforamanasitisforawoman.Amangoesshoppingbecauseheneedssomething.
Notuntil______thewholethingtohim______thathewaswrong.
"Doyouhaveanyclothes______today?"mymotherasked.
随机试题
B2B是指企业间的交易行为,销售的商品往往是________,交易中的客户是产业用户或者经营者。
“支配物理世界之运动必然性,也支配着精神世界的运动,因而在这个世界中,一切都服从于注定的命运。”这种认识会导致()。
某医院护理部质控组运用PDCA的管理方法,实行护理质量控制,依据既定的质量标准定期到临床查找问题,分析原因,针对原因制定改进措施,实施并反馈,不断改进提高,该医院实行护理质量控制过程中的依据是
男,63岁,近半年来常有不明原因的低热,体温37.5℃左右,未诊治。1周前肉眼血尿一次来就诊。血压170/100mmHg,查体未发现异常,查血红蛋白97g/L,尿常规(一)。其最可能的病因是
德国牧羊犬,雄性,触诊肾区有避让反应,少尿。尿液检查蛋白质阳性,比重降低。B超检查显示双肾肿大。该犬所患疾病可能是()
下列关于职业病的说法中正确的是( )。
下列各项中,决定预防性现金需求数额的因素有()。
旅游团抵达后,地陪应做好()工作。
职业是指人们由于社会分工而从事具有专门业务和特定职责并以此作为主要生活来源的()。
Theirtranslationwasfaulty.
最新回复
(
0
)