首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avo
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avo
admin
2017-04-20
65
问题
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avoiding the danger of a "scientific hierarchy" would be to see to it that every member of the general public was, as far as possible, scientifically educated. At the same time, scientists should be brought out of their isolation and encouraged to take a greater part in politics and administration.
As a general statement, I think most of us would agree with this, but I notice that, as usual, Mr. Cook does not define science, and merely implies in passing that it means certain exact sciences whose experiments can be made under laboratory conditions. Thus, adult education tends "to neglect scientific studies in favor of literary, economic and social subjects", economics and sociology not being regarded as branches of science, apparently. This point is of great importance. For the word science is at present used in at least two meanings, but the whole question of scientific education is obscured by the current tendency to dodge from one meaning to the other.
Science is generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc., or (b) a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact.
If you ask any scientist, or indeed almost any educated person, "What is science?" you are likely to get an answer approximating to (b). In everyday life, however, both in speaking and in writing, when people say "science" they mean (a). Science means something that happens in a laboratory: test-tubes, balances, Bunsen burners, microscopes. A biologist, an astronomer, perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician, is described as a "man of science": no one would think of applying this term to a statesman, a poet, a journalist or even a philosopher. And those who tell us that the young must be scientifically educated mean, almost invariably, that they should be taught more about radioactivity, or the stars, or the physiology of their own bodies, rather than that they should be taught to think more exactly.
This confusion of meaning, which is partly deliberate, has in it a great danger. Implied in the demand for more scientific education is the claim that if one has been scientifically trained one’s approach to all subjects will be more intelligent than if one had had no such training. A scientist’s political opinions, it is assumed, his opinions on sociological questions, on morals, on philosophy, perhaps even on the arts, will be more valuable than those of a layman. But a" scientist", as we have just seen, means in practice a specialist in one of the exact sciences. It follows that a chemist or physicist, as such, is politically more intelligent than a poet or a lawyer. And, in fact, there are already millions of people who do believe this.
But is it really true that a "scientist", in this narrower sense, is any likelier than other people to approach non-scientific problems in an objective way? There is not much reason for thinking so. Take one simple test—the ability to withstand nationalism. It is often loosely said that "Science is international", but in practice the scientific workers of all countries line up behind their own governments with fewer scruples than are felt by the writers and the artists. The German scientific community, as a whole, made no resistance to Hitler. There were plenty of gifted men to do the necessary research on such things as synthetic oil, jet planes, rocket projectiles and the atomic bomb.
On the other hand, what happened to German literature when the Nazis came to power? I believe no exhaustive lists have been published, but I imagine that the number of German scientists—Jew apart—who voluntarily exiled themselves or were persecuted by the regime was much smaller than the number of writers and journalists. More sinister than this, a number of German scientists swallowed the monstrosity of "racial science".
But does this mean that the general public should not be more scientifically educated? On the contrary! All it means is that scientific education for the masses will do little good, and probably a lot of harm, if it simply boils down to more physics, more chemistry, more biology, etc. to the detriment of literature and history. Its probable effect on the average human being would be to narrow the range of his thoughts and make him more than ever contemptuous of such knowledge as he did not possess; and his political reactions would probably be somewhat less intelligent than those of an illiterate peasant who retained a few historical memories and a fairly sound aesthetic sense.
Clearly, scientific education ought to mean the implanting of a rational, skeptical, experimental habit of mind. It ought to mean acquiring a method—a method that can be used on any problem that one meets—and not simply piling up a lot of facts. Put it in those words, and the apologist of scientific education will usually agree. Press him further, ask him to particularize, and somehow it always turns out that scientific education means more attention to the exact sciences, in other words—more facts. The idea that science means a way of looking at the world, and not simply a body of knowledge, is in practice strongly resisted. I think sheer professional jealousy is part of the reason for this.
Which of the following is INCORRECT as regards scientists?
选项
A、Many people assume that scientists can do well in handling political affairs.
B、German scientists did research on atomic bombs.
C、Generally people don’t regard an economist as a scientist.
D、Scientists prefer laboratory work to administration.
答案
D
解析
细节题。第五段最后指出,那么接下去的推论就是,一个化学家或物理学家,或者其他类似的科学家在政治上要比诗人或律师更有智慧。事实上已经有数以百万计的人对此深信不疑,故[A]符合文意。第六段最后一句指出,始终有许多才俊之士在对合成油料、喷气飞机、火箭和原子弹之类做必要的研究,故[B]符合文意;第二段第二句指出,成人教育往往会“忽视那些有利于文学、经济学和社会学科的研究”,很显然,经济学和社会学没有被看作科学的分支,故[C]符合文意。只有[D]文中没有提及,故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/etzK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AccordingtotheFTCstudy,whengaspricesgodown,
AccordingtotheUnitedNations,lessSomalislefttheircountrybecause______.
Acreditcardthatonlyworkswhenithearsitsowner’svoicehasbeendevelopedbyUSscientists.Researchershopethatthe【B1】
DetroitseemstobewhereWallStreetmeetsMainStreet.TightcreditisreckonedtohavecosttheAmericancarmakers40,000sal
Inlastweek’sTribune,therewasaninterestingletterfromMr.J.StewartCook,inwhichhesuggestedthatthebestwayofavo
Accordingtosociolinguists’findings,innormalsituations,______tendstobemorepoliteandlessassertive.
The______andSaxonsaretheancestorsoftheEnglishpeopletoday.
Managementjargoncanalienatestaffandleavebosseslookinguntrustworthyandweak,accordingtoasurveypublishedonMonday
PASSAGETHREEWhydidtheauthorearnthenicknameCaptainCalamity?
PASSAGETHREEAccordingtoFransdeWaal,wheredoesmoralitycomefrom?
随机试题
企业为确保供应稳定,进人供应商所在行业和市场,这属于( )战略。
A、疼痛B、父母与子女间的角色期望冲突C、陌生的环境D、巩固弹性防线E、增强抵抗新根据纽曼健康系统模式,以上属于个体外的压力源的是
一黑白花奶牛,4岁多,体重约450kg,1周前顺产,现发现该牛精神沉郁,食欲下降,渐进性消瘦,乳汁减少。临床检查:患牛呼吸脉搏及体温无明显变化,瘤胃空虚,蠕动无力,粪便干硬,外覆黏液,乳房肿胀其浅表静脉明显扩张,泌乳量减少,乳汁有特殊的烂苹果气味,阴户常有
下列属于急性卡他性胃炎的特征是
A.药品经营企业B.首营企业C.首营品种D.药品直调E.处方调配销售药品时,营业人员根据医生处方调剂、配给药品的过程称为()。
某项目在城市规划中要求建筑红线后退8m,是指其建筑物最外边线从()后退8m。
常用的普通螺栓有( )。
下列各项中,符合消费税有关规定的是()。
旧唯物主义反映论的根本缺陷是()。
Diamonds,sparklingunderanAfricansun,haveanattractioncommensurate(相称的)withtheirhighpriceandbeauty.ForAnglo-Americ
最新回复
(
0
)