首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have
admin
2019-11-17
30
问题
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.
In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:
选项
A、What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B、To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C、What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D、How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E、Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?
答案
E
解析
Evaluation of a Plan
Situation New environmental regulations will increase the costs of disposing of the salt water that results from the use of large amounts of common salt in leather manufacturing. The manufacturer is considering switching from common salt to potassium chloride, because the by-product of the latter could be reprocessed to yield a crop fertilizer, with little waste left over to be disposed.
Reasoning In order to determine whether it would be profitable to switch from using common salt to using potassium chloride, which of the five questions does the manufacturer NOT need to answer? The chemical properties making potassium chloride an effective means of preserving animal hides might be quite different from those that make common salt effective, but there is no particular reason for thinking that this would impact the profitability of switching to potassium chloride. The relevant effects on the preserved hides might be the same even if the properties that brought about those effects were quite different. Thus, without more information than is provided in the passage, this question is irrelevant.
A The savings in waste disposal costs that would be gained by switching to potassium chloride could be cancelled out if the cost of potassium chloride needed far exceeded that for common salt.
B If switching to potassium chloride would force the manufacturer to replace the equipment it uses for preserving hides, then it might be less profitable to switch.
C Even though there is said to be relatively little waste associated with using potassium chloride in the process, if the costs of this disposal are very high due to environmental regulations, it might be less profitable to switch.
D If the leather that results from the use of potassium chloride looks substantially different from that which results when common salt has been used, then the leather might be less attractive to consumers, which would adversely affect the economics of switching to potassium chloride.
E Correct. Note that the question as stated here presupposes that potassium chloride and salt are both effective means for preserving animal hides—so it does not raise any issue as to whether potassium chloride is adequately effective or as effective as salt (clearly, an issue of effectiveness would be relevant to profitability).
The correct answer is E.
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/dmkO777K
本试题收录于:
GMAT VERBAL题库GMAT分类
0
GMAT VERBAL
GMAT
相关试题推荐
Evenachildknowsthatnoddingheadmeans"Yes".Butsomepeoplewouldprobably【C1】______whentheyfirstcametoIndia.Whent
Stupidpeopleoftenfinditdifficultto________theirprejudices.
Idon’tliketodisturbyou,becauseyou’requitetired______today.
WeallknowthatDNAhastheabilitytoidentifyindividualsbut,becauseitisinherited,therearealsoregionsoftheDNAstr
Wasitbecausehewasill________heaskedforleave?
Itseemsthatoil______fromthispipeforsometime.Wewillhavetotakethemachineaparttoputitright.
KidsoftenaskScoutBassett,ofPalmDesert,California,ifshewishesshehadtwonormallegs.Scout,18,answers,"No.Ihave
______ofthetwobrothersarefondofclassicalmusic.
Thebuilding______mostlyundamagedaftertheearthquake,andonlyminorrepairswerenecessary.
Initsearlyhistory,Chicagohadfloodsfrequently,especiallyinthespring,makingthestreetssomuddythatpeople,horses,
随机试题
锌试剂分光光度法适用于()中铜含量的测定。
下列检查结果中,最能反映慢性肾炎患者肾实质严重损害的是
下列哪种细胞因子不是由淋巴细胞产生的
两孔口形状、尺寸相同,一个是自由出流,出流量为Q1;另一个是淹没出流,出流量为Q2,两者作用水头相同则Q1、Q2的关系为()。
某招标项目采用评标价法进行评标,有四家单位投标有效,其中( )的投标书为最优投标书。
有下列( )情形之一的,委托代理终止。
2×17年12月31日,甲公司对一起未决诉讼确认的预计负债为400万元。2×18年3月6日,法院对该起诉讼判决,甲公司应赔偿乙公司300万元,甲公司和乙公司均不再上诉,至2×18年3月31日甲公司未实际支付该款项。甲公司适用的所得税税率为15%,按净利润的
主张教学的任务在于训练学生的官能,训练学生思维形式的教育理论被称为()
①它发轫于明清之际,贯穿清朝一代,其发展历程颇具启示意义②因而,盛京文化兼有清文化源头及清留都文化的双重内容③最初它仅指沈阳城一地,随历史演进,而成盛京(奉天)地区、陪都地方,范围所及已囊括东北全境④“盛京文化”,指清代盛京地区以满族为主体的各族共创
在上高原初期,心率增加是由于中枢神经系统处于缺氧状态()
最新回复
(
0
)