首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where la
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where la
admin
2022-10-18
71
问题
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
选项
A、Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
B、Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
C、Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
D、Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
E、States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
答案
D
解析
The argument suggests that passengers involved in automobile accidents in the United States typically are more seriously injured than those in Europe. Furthermore, in Europe, a different safety belt design is used. The argument suggests that these
European-style safety belts are more protective against serious injury than those used in the United States. Furthermore, it suggests that the United States would therefore benefit by adopting more stringent design standards for safety belts.
To clarify, the rate of severe injuries would indicate, for example, the number of seriously injured passengers per 100,000 passengers involved in automobile accidents. Note that this rate does not depend on the total number of passengers involved in automobile accidents.
However, many other factors could provide an alternative explanation for these differences in rate of severe injury. The question stem asks us which answer choice does NOT weaken the argument; in other words, we must find a factor among the answer choices that does NOT account for this difference in the rate of severe injury. Effectively, we will be looking for the answer that has no bearing on the rate of severe injury.
Which one of the statements given does NOT weaken the argument?
A This choice weakens the argument. It suggests the possibility that the difference in rates of severe injury is due to the number of people who actually wear safety belts in the U.S. versus in Europe. This rate is, of course, irrespective of the functionality of the belts themselves. In other words, the effectiveness of the belt design is irrelevant if the belt is not being worn in the first place.
B This choice weakens the argument. Training to understand how to minimize injury, rather than a safety belt design difference, may be a primary factor accounting for the lower severe injury rate in Europe.
C This choice weakens the argument. The fact that cars constructed in Europe are more sturdy may account for the lower severe injury rate in Europe rather than the difference in the types of safety belts used.
D Correct. This choice does not weaken the argument. The higher likelihood that one is involved in an automobile accident in the U.S. actually has no bearing on the higher rate of severe injury among passengers who are involved in automobile accidents. That is, the rate itself is a proportion of the total number of passengers involved in accidents rather than the number itself. This rate would remain the same whether 10 accidents or 10 million accidents occurred.
E This answer choice suggests that even implementation within the United States of the European safety belt design does not seem to change serious injury rates. This implies, of course, that some other factor is likely responsible for the differences in rates of serious injury between the U.S. and Europe.
The correct answer is D.
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/dFkO777K
本试题收录于:
GMAT VERBAL题库GMAT分类
0
GMAT VERBAL
GMAT
相关试题推荐
Howcanwegetridofgarbage?Dowehaveenoughenergysourcestomeetourfutureenergyneeds?Thesearetwoimportantqu
Howcanwegetridofgarbage?Dowehaveenoughenergysourcestomeetourfutureenergyneeds?Thesearetwoimportantqu
TheUnitedStates【C1】______alargepartoftheNorthAmericancontinent.ItsneighborsareCanada【C2】______thenorth,andMexico
Ourjourneywasslowbecausethetrainstopped________atdifferentvillages.
IftheDakotaAccessPipeline(输油管道)iscompleted,itwillcarrynearlyhalfamillionbarrelsofoilacrossfourstateseveryd
Scientistssaidtheyhavefoundevidenceofagiantplanetfaroutinoursolarsystem.Inastatement,theCaliforniaInstitute
Overtheyears,collegestudentshavestoodtogetherforwhattheybelievein,fromcivilrightstoanti-warpoliciestothemor
Peopleshouldwashfruit______withchemicalsbeforeeatingit.
Itisdifficulttoimaginewhatlifewouldbelikewithoutmemory.Themeaningsofthousandsofeverydayperceptions,thebases
随机试题
胸骨左缘第2肋间可闻及连续性杂音,应考虑为
A、腹部专业用超声诊断仪B、心脏专业用超声诊断仪C、M型超声心动图D、A型超声E、伪彩显示图像侧重脏器细致解剖显示
初产妇,32岁,宫内孕39周,于昨晚感觉腹部一阵阵发紧,每半个小时一次,每次持续3~5分钟,今天早上孕妇感觉腹部疼痛,每5~分钟一次,每次持续45秒左右。临产后,该产妇不宜灌肠的情况是
《国务院关于化解产能过剩矛盾的指导意见》的主要任务不包括()。
位于市区的某动漫软件公司为增值税一般纳税人,2016年7月经营业务如下:(1)进口一台机器设备,国外买价折合人民币640000元,运抵我国入关地前支付的运费折合人民币42000元、保险费折合人民币38000元,入关后运抵公司所在地,取得运输公司开具的
皮亚杰认为,()岁是儿童从他律道德向自律道德转化的分水岭。
求证方程x+p+qcosx=0恰有一个实根,其中p,q为常数,且0<q<1.
A、Showherpassionforjournalism.B、Choosejournalismashercareer.C、Handinawritingsample.D、Writeanessayonagivento
A、Improvethemselves.B、Getridofemptydreams.C、Followtheculturaltradition.D、Attemptsomethingimpossible.A
ThesmallcoastaltownofBroome,innorthwestAustralia,isaremotevillageinthevastcountryside.Therearenotraffic
最新回复
(
0
)