首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
admin
2012-01-23
57
问题
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expcetations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adiunct to an organlsatlon’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s) with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategms, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors—their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid "nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategtc improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What can we learn about Recruitment Process Outsourcing in the first paragraph?
选项
A、All companies tend to outsource their not so important services.
B、It gained wide acceptance among the employers as soon as it came out.
C、Recruiting is an important department of many organisations.
D、It took a long time before RPO finally became popular.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段提到“Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while.”即:招聘流程外包在近几年赢得了很好的发展势头,但是这个过程也花费了一段时间。所以,D项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/bo7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
WhatdoesthecompanyplantodoinChina?
WhatwilltakeplaceonFriday?
TaskSheet:A:TimeManagement:theimpotanceofprioritizingtasksofworkB:Recruitment:howtoselectcompetentapplican
SaleReductionYourcompanyisaninternationalcompanywhichproduceselectronicproductS.Yourcompany’ssaleshavered
FinancialManagement:howtoensurethatacompanyplanisimplemented?
Management:theimportanceofaclearlydefinedmanagementstructureinabusinessorganization
•YouwillhearpartofaninterviewbetweenJessiePaul,theglobalmarketingheadinQuintant,andaninterviewer.•Foreachqu
•YouwillhearthespeechoftheManagingDirectoroftheInternationalMonetaryFundatthepressconference.•Asyoulisten,f
•YouwillhearthespeechoftheManagingDirectoroftheInternationalMonetaryFundatthepressconference.•Asyoulisten,f
【C1】______adoubttherearecountriesthatofferinterestingadvantagesforentrepreneurs,selfemployedandbusinessowners.
随机试题
在当今资本主义国家两党制出现的新变化有()。
育亨宾:哌唑嗪:
男,32岁,左下腹痛1年,伴腹泻,每日便5~8次,间断便血,常有里急后重。检查:血沉快;粪便镜下有红细胞和脓细胞;结肠镜检查发现结肠黏膜血管纹理模糊,表面呈细颗粒状,脆性增加伴糜烂。最可能的诊断是
APTT测定时加入白陶土的作用为
患者FIM评分为60分,依赖程度为
消费者在超市购物,消费总金额500元,通过支付宝扫码方式使用中信银行信用卡结账。根据支付结算法律制度的规定,下列说法正确的是()。
甲公司2010年12月31日的资产负债表显示的净资产为负,财务状况不断恶化。有关资产:商业用房一间,账面价值100万元;机器设备一套,账面价值20万元;银行存款30万元;应收乙的账款30万元(2011年1月20E1到期);应收丙的账款70万元(2011年2
喜欢小动物的儿童,会经常接近小动物,在接触的过程中,逐渐了解小动物的生活习性,掌握有关小动物的常识。对于那些害怕小动物的儿童,则很难做到。这说明了情绪的()。
从学科性质米看,心理学是一门()科学。
ThebeginningofwhatwastobecometheUnitedStateswascharacterizedbyinconsistenciesinthevaluesandbehaviorofitspop
最新回复
(
0
)