首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2009-03-16
32
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
选项
A、the British legal system can do the basic job well — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent
B、the British legal system is worse than the continental legal system
C、the British legal system is often considered to be not very fair
D、tbe British legal system is very efficient
答案
C
解析
句意推测题。由句中game(游戏)与a serious attempt to do justice(实现正义的严肃尝试)之间的对比关系及这一段后文对于英国审判过程的描述可以推知[C]对。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/ZVPd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Allinternationalchainschoolsteachmanydifferentlanguages.
Millionsofman-hoursarelosttoindustrythroughemployeessufferingbackacheorstraincausedbyoperatingpoorlydesignedma
Insuranceissupposedtoprovideprotectionagainstfinancialrisks,andwhiledyingtoosoonisonemajorriskweface,another
Agoodbookmaydrawourattentionsocompletelythatweforgetoursurroundingsandevenouridentityforthetimebeing.
Wherewastheletterprobablyplacedmanyyearsago?
Mostexpertsbelievethatanever-increasingnumberofcountriesandterroristgroupswillgainthetechnicalcapabilitytoacqu
A=SectionAB=SectionBC=SectionCSectionAEngineeringstudentsaresupposedtobepracticallyandrationally
Asagrown-up,howdoesthespeakerseeherselfinthemirror?
Whataresomedisadvantagesofthenuclearfamilyforwomen?
Paintingyourhouseislikeaddingsomethingtoahugecommunalpictureinwhichtherestofthepaintingisdoneeitherbynatu
随机试题
行车中当驾驶人意识到车辆爆胎时,应在控制住方向的情况下采取紧急制动,迫使车辆迅速停住。
银行、投资公司、证券公司和保险公司等属于()
某镇共有52500人,全人群脑卒中的发病率为1.2%,其中14300名吸烟者中有310人发生脑卒中,该人群中吸烟导致脑卒中发生的人群归因危险度百分比是
()的原则是学用一致、按需施教、知识技能培训与组织文件培训兼顾、严格考核和择优嘉奖。
消防工程验收应具备的条件包括()。
某市化妆品生产企业,为增值税一般纳税人,2013年度有关生产、经营情况如下:(1)销售成套化妆品30万套,开具增值税专用发票,注明销售额7200万元,销项税额1224万元,销售成套化妆品5套件,开具普通发票,取得含销售收入额1404万元。本期外购
面包沃尔夫冈.博歇尔特①她突然醒来。两点半。她寻思,为什么会突然醒了。哦,原来是这样!厨房里有人碰了一下椅子。她仔细地听着厨房里的声音。寂静无声。太安静了,她用手摸了一下身边的床,发现是空的。这就是为什么如此特别安静的原因了——没有他的
一、注意事项1.申论考试是对应考者阅读理解能力、综合分析能力、提出和解决问题能力、文字表达能力的测试;2.参考时限:阅读资料40分钟,参考作答110分钟;3.仔细阅读给定资料,按照后面提出来的“作答要求”作答;4.请
在关系模型中,每一个二维表称为一个
Anewpartnerpushesouttwoclosefriendsonaverage,leavingloverswithasmallerinnercircleofpeopletheycanturntoin
最新回复
(
0
)