首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Science has few more controversial topics than human intelligence—in particular, whether variations in it are a result of nature
Science has few more controversial topics than human intelligence—in particular, whether variations in it are a result of nature
admin
2021-02-21
124
问题
Science has few more controversial topics than human intelligence—in particular, whether variations in it are a result of nature or nurture, and especially whether such variations differ between the sexes. The mines in this field can blow up an entire career, as Larry Summers found out in 2005 when he spoke of the hypothesis that the mathematical aptitude needed for physics and engineering, as well as for maths itself, is innately rarer in women than in men. He resigned as president of Harvard University shortly afterwards.
It is bold, therefore, of Jonathan Wai, Martha Putallaz and Matthew Makel, of Duke University in North Carolina, to enter the argument with a paper that addresses both questions. In this paper, they describe how they sifted through nearly three decades of standardised tests administered to American high-school students to see what had been happening to the country’s brightest sparks. They draw two conclusions. One is that a phenomenon called the Flynn effect applies in particular to the brightest of the bright. The other is that part, but not all, of the historic difference between the brainiest men and women has vanished.
The three researchers drew their data from Duke University’s Talent Identification Programme, TIP, which is designed to discover especially clever candidates early on: all the participants had scored in the top 5% of ability when confronted with exams designed for much older students. TIP, in turn, draws on three national exams: SAT, EXPLORE and ACT.
In the early 1980s, the ratio of males to females in the top 0.01% of maths scores in SAT, the Scholastic Aptitude Test, was around 13 to 1. By the early 1990s, it had fallen to four to one. After this, however, it remained unaltered.
It is clear that the rise itself must be "nurture" of some sort, but the subsequent stasis could have either explanation. A line of reasoning in favour of "nature" is that put forward by Simon Baron-Cohen, a psychologist at Cambridge University. This connects the extreme systematising patterns of thought which make a good mathematician with the advantage of men among those with Asperger’s syndrome, a form of autism that does not harm a person’s general intelligence. But the difference could equally well be the result of some as-yet-unclear difference between the ways girls and boys are brought up.
That such unclear environmental influences can have real effects on IQ is eloquently illustrated by the Flynn effect. This phenomenon, brought to the world’s attention in the 1980s by James Flynn of the University of Otago, in New Zealand, is that average IQs around the world have been rising at the rate of 0.3 points a year for the past eight decades. Using the TIP data, Dr Wai and his colleagues showed that this is as true of the brightest youngsters in American society as it is of lesser mortals, suggesting that even they can have their abilities boosted by whatever is causing the Flynn effect. Once again, the changes seem to be mainly in mathematics. Scores in the brightest children’s verbal-reasoning and reading abilities demonstrate no clear trend, but all three national tests show sustained improvements in their mathematical ability over the past three decades.
[A] aims to find out extraordinarily smart people based on three exams in America.
[B] shows, with colleagues, that general IQs of the cleverest youngsters have been rising.
[C] assumes that genetically, there is an inequality in mathematical ability between sexes.
[D] presents that there are some relationships between intelligence and Asperger’s syndrome.
[E] shows that IQ has been rising on average under environmental influences.
[F] finds an inequality in mathematical ability between sexes according to his research.
[G] concludes, with his colleagues, that intelligent difference between sexes doesn’t change.
Larry Summers
选项
答案
C
解析
Larry Summers出现在文中的第一段。该段讲到Larry Summers的一个假设:就物理,工程和数学所需要的数学能力而言,女性天生不如男性。C中的genetically、mathematical ability分别与文中的innately、mathematical aptitude同义,inequality是对原文rarer的转述,故确定C为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/Z1Y4777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
ThewriterwarnsAmericansthat______.By"commonresources"(Paragraph2),theauthormeansthat______.
ManyAmericansregardthejurysystemasaconcreteexpressionofcrucialdemocraticvalues,includingtheprinciplesthatallc
ManyAmericansregardthejurysystemasaconcreteexpressionofcrucialdemocraticvalues,includingtheprinciplesthatallc
Overthepastdecade,manycompanieshadperfectedtheartofcreatingautomaticbehaviors-habits-amongconsumers.Thesehabits
Asia’srealboat-rockerisagrowingChina,notJapan,aseniorAmericaneconomistobserved.Thereissomuchnoisesurround
RuthSimmonsjoinedGoldmanSachs’sboardasanoutsidedirectorinJanuary2000;ayearlatershebecamepresidentofBrownUni
HenricIbsen,authoroftheplay"ADoll’sHouse",inwhichapretty,helplesshousewifeabandonsherhusbandandchildrentose
Socialscientistshavebeentryingtoidentifytheconditionsmostlikelytopromotesatisfyinghumanlives.Theirfindingsgive
Socialscientistshavebeentryingtoidentifytheconditionsmostlikelytopromotesatisfyinghumanlives.Theirfindingsgive
Inrecentdays,AmericanAirlineshasbeenforcedtocancelmorethan40flightsinPhoenix.Thereason:Withdaytimehighshove
随机试题
Althoughhewasrich,______heisnothappy.
下列哪种菌体表面物质对牙周组织毒性最强
对于社会主义中的人道主义,以下理解不正确的是
某公司发行的股票每股盈余为5元,股利支付率为40%,股权收益率为8%,年终分红已支付完毕,目前投资者的预期收益率普遍为15%,则该只股票合理的价格应为()元。
学习者运用缩简和编歌诀的方法帮助记忆知识的学习策略属于()
今年全国将普遍推行“证照分离”改革,企业开办时间、商标注册周期、工程建设项目审批时间都将大幅缩短,大众创业的___________________之势不可阻挡。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是:
袋中装有4枚正品均匀硬币,2枚次品均匀硬币,次品硬币的两面均印有国徽.在袋中任取一枚,将它投掷了3次,已知每次都得到国徽,求此硬币是正品的概率.
程序设计中最基本、最常用的控制结构是【】。
ItispossibleforsomestudentsinHigherEducationinBritaintoborrowmoneythroughagovernmentscheme.Theseloansarecal
Itishardtoconceiveofalanguagewithoutnounsorverbs.ButthatisjustwhatRiauIndonesianis,accordingtoDavidGil,a
最新回复
(
0
)