首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It was hard to find anyone left standing after the government’s strange case against nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee came crashing
It was hard to find anyone left standing after the government’s strange case against nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee came crashing
admin
2010-01-18
71
问题
It was hard to find anyone left standing after the government’s strange case against nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee came crashing to the ground last week. No one was bleeding so heavily as the FBI and its director, Louis Freeh, whose top agent gave up some of his testimony against the 2-year-old Los Alamos engineer. But there was rubble everywhere you looked. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson, whose department had ignored security at Los Alamos for years, was walking around in a daze. Rescue workers were still searching for Attorney General Janet Reno and her deputy, Eric Holder, who were trying to explain why they had suddenly agreed to drop 58 of 59 charges against a man once accused of stealing the "crown jewels "of America’s nuclear factory. When master survivalist Bill Clinton came out of hiding, it was to confide to reporters that he had "always had reservations" about some aspects of the case —words that recalled the way he ducked responsibility for the Waco fiasco in 1998.
And though the neighbors in White Rock, N. M. put out flags last Wednesday and welcomed Lee home with a big backyard party on Barcelona Avenue, the man at the center of the wreckage still has a lot of explaining to do. Lee won back his freedom only after pleading guilty to a single felony count of mishandling national-defense information, which means he downloaded the equivalent of 400, 000 pages of classified data about the U. S. nuclear-weapons program onto an unsecured computer system and then transferred them to high-volume cassettes. Lee had refused to spell out why he spent an estimated 40 hours over 70 days downloading all that data, what he did with much of it or why he tried repeatedly to enter a restricted area after losing his security clearance—once, around 3: 30 a. m. on Christmas Eve. As part of his plea agreement, Lee promised to explain everything to investigators. He will never again be able to vote, however, Or serve on a jury.
But the real damage from the Lee case isn’t the leaks from national labs or the mystery of secrets that got away. Instead, the case makes it harder to believe that in America at least, the governmem will always ensure that the punishment fits the crime.
The Wen Ho Lee story began in 1995, when a walk-in source gave the CIA a document from the People’s Republic of China that claimed Chinese weapons designers had obtained specific and highly classified details of an American nuclear warhead known as the W-88. Not everyone in the intelligence community was convinced the document was genuine. The Department Of Energy and the FBI, which handles spy catching, quickly learned that several agencies and some defense contractors had information about the W-88, and concluded that the leak had probably occurred at the weapons lab at Los Alamos, where most of the data were stored. DOE officials compiled a list of about 12 people who had both access to the material and contact with Chinese officials and scientists. On the list was Wen Ho Lee.
Finding out spies is hard. To stand a chance of putting them behind bars, you almost have to catch them in the act of forking over secrets. But in the Los Alamos case, the damage was already done, and so agents had to find a way to "walk the cat back, "as they like to say, and prove the crime in retrospect. That makes spy catching even harder, but the FBI didn’t do itself any favors. Bureau sources admit that when the probe was opened in May 1996, it was left to second- string agents. "It was dumb and dumber, "says a bureau veteran. "They put the wrong people to investigate it, and they didn’t give it sufficient oversight from headquarters. "
From the sentence "Energy Secretary Bill Richardson, whose department had ignored security at Los Alamos for years, was walking around in a daze. ", we know that_____.
选项
A、Energy Secretary Bill Richardson was chiefly responsible for the case
B、Energy Secretary Bill Richardson was in a great angry
C、Energy Secretary Bill Richardson was losing his mind in dealing with the case
D、Energy Secretary Bill Richardson was defeated severely
答案
C
解析
解答此题的关键在于理解最后一个词组“in adaze”,daze意思是“茫然、昏眩”,这里指此君在这一问题面前手足无措,一片茫然。故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/YxvO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisNOTanareaincludedbyMENAP?
Whathavescientistsconcludedthroughstudiesovertheyears?
WhichofthefollowingisNOTincludedintheBeltandRoadInitiativeeffortstobuildawebofinfrastructure?
Inwhatwaydidthescientistssupposealienlifemightbethriving?
ThepurposeoftheAmericancourtsystemistoprotecttherightsofthepeople.AccordingtoAmericanlaw,ifsomeoneisaccuse
Codeswitchingiswhenpeopleswitch,orchange,fromonelanguagetoanotherwhilespeaking.Theymightbeginaconversationin
A、IbitmytonguewhilespeakingSpanish.B、I’mgraduallyimprovingmySpanish.C、I’mnottakingenoughSpanishclassesduringa
Priorto1975,unioneffortstoorganizepublic-sectorclericalworkers,mostofwhomarewomen,weresomewhatlimited.Thefact
随机试题
如果数字显示仪器的分辨力为δx,则区间半宽度a=δx/2,可设为均匀分布,查表得____________。
关于电势与电势能的说法中正确的有()。
引起亚急性自体瓣膜心内膜炎最常见的致病菌是
甲十七岁,以个人积蓄1,000元在慈善拍卖会拍得明星乙表演用过的道具,市价约100元。事后,甲觉得道具价值与其价格很不相称,颇为后悔。关于这一买卖,下列哪一说法是正确的?(卷三2010年真题试卷第2题)
甲企业为增值税一般纳税人,2015年度至2017年度发生的与无形资产有关的业务如下:(1)2015年1月10日,甲企业开始自行研发一项行政管理用非专利技术,截至2015年5月31日,用银行存款支付外单位协作费74万元,领用本单位原材料成本26万元(不考虑
2004年该省生产总值为:下列选项中,说法正确的是:
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
(2006年真题)甲的父亲在一次车祸中丧生,甲依法继承了其父的遗产。引起遗产继承这一法律关系发生的法律事实是
要取得中国革命的胜利,主要依靠的是()
设则在区间(-1,1)内()
最新回复
(
0
)