首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
admin
2015-01-27
67
问题
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page.
For each question(15-20), mark one letter(A, B, C or D)on your Answer Sheet.
Recruitment Process Outsourcing
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO— has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expectations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adjunct to an organisation’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s)with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategies, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors— their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid " nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategic improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What will the author talk about in the following paragraph?
选项
A、He will continue to talk about the history of RPO.
B、He will talk about the principles of raising the efficiency and end result of the RPO solution.
C、He will talk about the types of RPO.
D、He will talk about different RPO solutions.
答案
B
解析
文中第二段提到“Before we look at those tenets,however,it’s important to under一stand the history of RPO.”即:我们在看这些原则之前,先了解一下招聘流程外包的发展历史,所以,B项符台题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/Yg7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
1.(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)A.StaffManagement:howtoachieveandmaintainhighm
Inthispart,theinterlocutorasksquestionstoeachofthecandidatesinturn.Youhavetogiveinformationaboutyourselfand
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetopic
Tellingyouraudiencethattheycanaskquestions请听众提问
Howtooperateawordprocessor
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
TaskSheetforCandidateATaskSheet1A:Customerrelations:howtodefuseangrycustomersB:Recruitment:howtohireanewm
TaskSheetforCandidateATaskSheetlA:Customerrelations:howtodefuseangrycustomersB:Recruitment:howtohireanew
随机试题
下面句中的“意”词性完全相同的一项是()。①意气扬扬甚自得也(《管晏列传》)②然子之意自以为足,妾是以求去也(《管晏列传》)③因厚赂单于,答其善意(《苏武传》)④意孰为高?行孰为厚(《先秦诸子语录》)
同层动态增强扫描主要研究病灶的增强特征,鉴别其性质,最常用于
简述投标策略的类型有哪些?绘制本投标决策的决策树图。
下列关于建设项目施工投标文件的表述中,正确的有()。
实现在施工组织设计中所确定的()是编制施工组织设计要实现的最终效果和目的。
发生人工费索赔时能按计日工费计算的是()。
建筑业企业申请资质升级,除向建设行政主管部门提供设立时申请资质所需资料外,还应当提供的资料不包括()。
注册会计师应当根据具体情况判断某一事项是否属于重大事项。重大事项通常包括()。
TheresearchwasdonebyaDr.GriffithsinEngland.Hecomparedthebehaviorof15regulargamblers(赌徒)withthoseof15non-r
Whenthetelevisionisgood,nothing—notthetheater,notthemagazines,ornewspapers—nothingisbetter.Butwhentelevisionis
最新回复
(
0
)