首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
【F1】Sending your child to piano or violin lessons in a bid to boost their academic achievement is a waste of money, according to
【F1】Sending your child to piano or violin lessons in a bid to boost their academic achievement is a waste of money, according to
admin
2016-03-22
87
问题
【F1】
Sending your child to piano or violin lessons in a bid to boost their academic achievement is a waste of money, according to scientists.
Although research has shown that youngsters who take music lessons are more likely to be top of their class, Professor Schellenberg claims this link is misleading.【F2】
Instead, improved academic performance may be because brighter children from privileged backgrounds are more likely to learn an instrument, rather than music classes helping to boost their intelligence.
"Music may change you a bit, but it’s also the case that different children take music lessons." said Professor Schellenberg, who added that parents’ education was the most influential factor on musicality.【F3】
Children who take music lessons come from families with higher incomes, they come from families with more educated parents, they also do more extracurricular activities, they have higher IQs, and they do better at school.
【F4】
In tests on 167 children who played piano or other instruments, they found their answer to personality tests could predict how likely it was for them to continue their music lessons.
Those who were more outgoing and conscientious were more likely to continue to play. "We were motivated by the fact that kids who take music lessons are particularly good students, in school they actually do better than you would predict from their IQ, so obviously something else is going on." Professor Schellenberg told the American Association for the Advancement of Science(A A AS)annual conference in Boston.
【F5】
Asked if so-called helicopter parents were wasting their money sending their children to music lessons in the belief they could boost their school results, he said "yes".
"Clearly studying music changes the brain, but so does any learning. In fact, that is what learning is." he said.
【F2】
选项
答案
事实上,更优秀的学习成绩可能是因为这些家庭背景更优越的小孩更聪明,更可能去学习乐器,而并非学音乐有助于提高他们的智力。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/YKsZ777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
[A]Whyreadingfallsintodecline?[B]Readingisrelatedtonationalpolitics[C]Readingisastimulatingexperience[D]Reading
[A]AmongthereasonsIwouldn’tsendmyownchildtoboardingschoolisthatbeingaroundone’sadolescentpeers24hoursaday
[A]AmongthereasonsIwouldn’tsendmyownchildtoboardingschoolisthatbeingaroundone’sadolescentpeers24hoursaday
Gettinglaidoffaffectsnotonlyone’seconomicwell-being,italsocurtailsone’sinvolvementincommunityandsocialactiviti
GivingAdvicetoaYoungerCousin给堂/表妹建议Writeane-mailofabout100wordsbasedonthefollowingsituation:YourcousinAnnw
Whatmakesagreathighschool?Americansthinkalotofthingsdo,fromoutstandingacademicsorasupportiveenvironmentfors
Forthepastfiveyears,Dr.StephenPosthasbeenfundingresearchprojectsthattesthowaltruism(selflessness),compassion,
Therealizationthatcoldscankillhasrenewedinterestinfindingvaccinesandtreatments.Thetroubleisthatthecommoncold
Menaregenerallybetterthanwomenontestsofspatialability,suchasmentallyrotatinganobjectthroughthreedimensionsor
Menaregenerallybetterthanwomenontestsofspatialability,suchasmentallyrotatinganobjectthroughthreedimensionsor
随机试题
下列关于移动平均数K值的说法不正确的是()
对产时“五防”,解释不正确是
A.急性菌痢普通型B.中毒型菌痢C.急性菌痢轻型D.慢性菌痢急性发作型E.慢性菌痢隐匿型突起高热,面色青灰,出冷汗及脉细数,尿少,属于
下述关于病毒性肺炎临床表现的叙述,正确的是
如图所示,用一附有水压差汁的毕托管测定某风道中空气流速。已知乐差计的读数△h=185mm,水的密度,ρ=1000kg/m3,空气的密度ρa=1.20kg/m3,测得的气流速度u约为:
《中国2l世纪初可持续发展行动纲要》提出的指导思想包括()。
手工方式下,由于受到人工计算能力所限,会计科目级别往往不能设置很细,而电算化方式下,由计算机来处理会计数据,不再出现计算能力问题,因此会计科目级别设得越多越好。()
根据以下资料,回答下列问题。2011年,我国货物进出口总额达到36421亿美元,比2002年增长4.9倍,年均增长21.7%。在出口总额中,机电产品占比由2002年的48.2%提高到2011年的57.2%;高新技术产品由20.8%提高到28.9%。201
设f(χ)是连续函数.(1)求初值问题的解,其中a>0;(2)若|f(χ)|≤k,证明:当χ≥0时,有|f(χ)|≤(eaχ-1).
______wasthefirsttointroducethesonnetintoEnglishliterature.
最新回复
(
0
)