首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
admin
2011-12-20
73
问题
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinctive activity. No other discipline has produced as much in such a short period. It is unclear yet how much of it will stand the test of time, but for sheer industry, the business school deserve credit. Not a day goes by without another wave of research papers, books, articles, and journals.
In these terms, schools have produced a generally accepted theoretical basis for management. When it comes to knowledge creation, however, they find themselves in difficulties. They are caught between the need for academic rigour and for real-world business relevance, which tend to pull in opposite directions. The desire to establish management as a credible discipline leads to research that panders to traditional academic criteria. The problem for business school researchers is that they seek the approval of their academic peers rather than the business community. In the United States this has led to the sort of grand ’paper clip counting’ exercises that meet demands for academic rigour but fail to add one iota to the real sum of human knowledge.
Business schools have too often allowed the constraints of the academic world to cloud their view of the real world. Business school researchers seek provable theories rather than helpful theories. They have championed a prescriptive approach to management based on analysis and, more recently, on fashionable ideas that soon disappear into the ether. The one best way approach encourages researchers to mould the idiosyncrasies of managerial reality into their tightly defined models of behaviour. Figures and statistics are fitted into linear equations and tidy models. Economists and other social scientists label this cure smoothing. Meanwhile, reality continually refuses to cooperate.
Central to this is the tension between relevance and rigour. In a perfect world, there would be no need to choose between the two. But in the business school world, the need to satisfy academic criteria and be published in journals often tilts the balance away from relevance. In other words, it is often easier to pursue quantifiable objectives than it is to add anything useful to the debate about management. To a large extent, the entire business school system works against useful, knowledge-creating research. Academics have five years in which to prove themselves if they are to make the academic grade. It seems long enough. But it can take two or even three years to get into a suitable journal. They therefore have around three years, probably less, to come up with an area of interest and carry out meaningful and original research. This is a demanding timescale. The temptation must be to slice up old data in new ways rather than pursue genuinely groundbreaking, innovative research.
It is a criticism also made by some business school insiders. "Academic journals tend to find more and more techniques for testing more and more obscure theories. They are asking trivial questions and answering them exactly. There has to be a backlash," says Julian Birkinshaw of London Business School. In large part, the problem goes back to a time when business schools were trying to establish themselves. Up until the 1960s, American business schools were dismissed as pseudo-academic institutions, including the universities of which they often formed a part, regarded them as a little more than vocational colleges. Since then, most of the leading schools have undergone major reassessments and introduced sweeping changes. However, it is questionable whether those changes have gone far enough.
What does the first paragraph suggest about the research generated by business schools?
选项
A、Its quality is variable.
B、Its lasting value is uncertain.
C、It has always been produced too quickly.
D、It has had no influence on management.
答案
B
解析
第一段第三句指出“It is unclear yet how much of it will stand the test of time”,即这些研究成果能否经得起时间考验还不确定,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/YDua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Legacy—supportagreement
cooperativerelationship
on—the-jobtraining
Contractingbyanindividual
中国国际进口博览会(ChinaInternationalImportExpo,简称CIIE)。2017年5月,习近平主席在“一带一路”国际合作【R31】________上宣布,中国将从2018年起举办中国国际进口博览会。2018年
中国国际进口博览会(ChinaInternationalImportExpo,简称CIIE)。2017年5月,习近平主席在“一带一路”国际合作【R31】________上宣布,中国将从2018年起举办中国国际进口博览会。2018年
Pleasewriteacompositionof400wordsonthefollowingtopic:MicroblogsaregainingmomentuminChinainthelastfewyea
Theeighteenth-centuryBritishthinkerEdmundBurkemadethefollowingobservationaboutthebenefitsofopposition:"Hethatwr
Youaresupposedtowriteacompositionofatleast150wordsonthefollowingtopic.Promises
Hecouldwriteverygoodstories,buthecouldnotpaintanypictures.Sohewas________.
随机试题
下列哪些物质可作为含氮激素作用的第二信使
以下所列治疗消化性溃疡的药物中,属于质子泵抑制剂的是
根据我国民事诉讼法的规定,下列哪些案件的审理程序中公告是必经的程序?()
现实生活中的问题是各种各样的,研究者倾向于将问题分为两类:________和无结构的问题。
(2017年真题)简述学校心理辅导的原则。
“视而不见,听而不闻”的现象,典型地表现了()
统计数据显示,坚持经常游泳的人与从不游泳的人平均寿命相同。由此可见,游泳并不能强身健体,延长寿命。如果以下陈述均为真,则哪一项最能够削弱题干结论?()
人类思维进化的顺序,是从具象到抽象,从图形到语言。粗粗了解一点文物史的人都知道,早期文明及其器物上只有图形,如世界各地的史前壁画,如半坡陶器上的鱼纹、人脸等。没有文字,因为语言能力不发达。语言能力发达以后,才有文字,人类文明才真正脱离原始阶段。而文字的进化
广告:在当今的世界上,你所拥有的汽车体现了你是怎么样的一个人。迈克车的信息很明确:它的拥有者是一个充满活力,具有攻击性和富有成就的人。你难道不应该拥有一辆迈克车吗?如果广告中所做的声明是正确的,那么根据那些声明,下面哪一项也一定是正确的?
阅读以下函数说明和C语言函数,将应填入(n)处的字句写在对应栏内。【说明】对20个数进行排序,可以利用选择法,即从后19个比较过程中,选择一个最小的与第一个元素交换,依次类推,即用第二个元素与后18个进行比较,并进行交换。【函数】
最新回复
(
0
)