首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Of the great variety of opinions concerning "marriage for money" , the following three are important with reference to the devel
Of the great variety of opinions concerning "marriage for money" , the following three are important with reference to the devel
admin
2011-03-14
64
问题
Of the great variety of opinions concerning "marriage for money" , the following three are important with reference to the development of the importance of money. Marriages based exclusively upon economic motives have not only existed in all periods and at all stages of development, but are particularly common a-mong primitive groups and conditions where they do not cause any offence at all. The disparagement of personal dignity that nowadays arises in every marriage that is not based on personal affection-so that a sense of decency requires the concealment of economic motives-does not exist in simpler cultures. The reason for this development is that increasing individualization makes it increasingly contradictory and discreditable to enter into purely individual relationships for other than purely individual reasons.
For nowadays the choice of a partner in marriage is no longer determined by social motives (though regard for the offspring may be considered to be such a motive) , in so far as society does not insist upon the couple, s equal social status-a condition, however, that provides a great deal of latitude and only rarely leads to conflicts between individual and social interests. In a quite undifferentiated society it may be relatively irrelevant who marries whom, irrelevant not only for the mutual relationship of the couple but also for the offspring. This is because where the constitutions, state of health, temperament, internal and external forms of life and orientations are largely the same within the group, the chance that the children will turn out well depends less upon whether the parents agree and complement each other than it does in highly differentiated society. It therefore seems quite natural and expedient that the choice of the partner should be determined by reasons other than purely individual affection. Yet personal attraction should be decisive in a highly individualized society where a harmonious relationship between two individuals becomes increasingly rare.
The declining frequency of marriage which is to be found everywhere in highly civilized cultural circumstances is undoubtedly due, in part, to the fact that highly differentiated people in general have difficulty in finding a completely sympathetic complement to themselves. Yet we do not possess any other criterion and indication for the advisability of marriage except mutual instinctive attraction. But, happiness is a purely personal matter, decided upon entirely by the couple themselves, and there would be no compelling reason for the official insistence on at least pretending love may be misleading—particularly in the higher strata, whose complicated circumstances often retard the growth of the purest instincts—no matter how much other conditions may affect the final results.it remains true that, with reference to procreation, love is decidedly superior to money as a factor selection. In fact, in this respect.it is the only fight and proper thing.
Marriage for money directly creates a situation of panmixia—the indiscriminate pairing regardless of individual qualities—a condition that biology has demonstrated to be the cause of the most direct and detrimental degeneration of the human species. In the case of marriage for money, the union of a couple is determined by a factor that has absolutely nothing to do with racial appropriateness—just as the regard for money often e-nough keeps apart a couple who really belong together—and it should be considered as a factor in degeneration to the same extent to which the undoubted differentiation of individuals makes selection by personal attraction more and more important. This case too illustrates once more that the increasing individualization within society renders money increasingly unsuitable as a mediator of purely individual relationships.
Panmixia is said to______.
选项
A、aid the selection process
B、complement individualization
C、inspire positive results
D、set up biological decline
答案
D
解析
文章指出,基于金钱的婚姻直接导致了随即交配群体的产生(不论素质是否相配就在一起),生物学已经证明这直接引发了人类的退化。最后一段Marriage for money direcdy creates a situation of panmixia--the indiscrinlinate pairing regardless of individual qualities--a condition that biology has demonstrated to be the cause of the most direct and detrimental degeneration of the humanspecies.
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/WwBO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
•ReadthefollowingpassagebelowaboutVolkswagen.•Foreachquestion23-28,choosethecorrectanswer.•Markoneletter(A,B
•ReadthefollowingpassagebelowaboutVolkswagen.•Foreachquestion23-28,choosethecorrectanswer.•Markoneletter(A,B
•ReadthefollowingreviewofabookcalledNeverQuit!TheUpsandDownsofRunningaFamilyBusiness.•Foreachquestion
•Lookatthelistbelow.ItshowsgeneralinformationofNewYorkZoo.•Forquestions6-10decidewhichsection(A-H)oft
AimsofAssetManagementAimofassetmanagementistoachievegreatesteffectivenessandprofitabilityfromproductionand
Theprevailingwindisthewinddirectionmostoftenobservedduringagiventimeperiod.Windspeedistherateatwhichtheai
Hehadwanteda25%raiseinpay,butaftertalkingtohisboss,hedecidedthata5%raisewouldhaveto______.
Ifthestruggleforasustainablesociety_____,wemusthavesomevisionofwhatweareaimingfor.
Ifeverybodytakesanactivepartandsayswhathethinks,thediscussionwillsurelybe______.
Inhis______tofurtherknowledgeoftheuniverse,manhasnowbeguntoexplorespace.
随机试题
中枢神经系统包括脑和()
下面哪种病可以看到KerleyB线
结肠癌Crohn病
《合同法》第93条第1款规定:“当事人协商一致,可以解除合同。”从法的规范作用来看,该项规定属于下列哪种情况?()
公司收购本公司股份后,属于减少公司注册资本情形的,应当自收购之日起()内注销;属于与持有本公司股份的其他公司合并和股东因对股东大会作出的公司合并、分立决议持异议,要求公司收购其股份情形的,应当在()内转让或者注销。
TrafficinOurCitiesThevolumeoftrafficinmanycitiesintheworldtodaycontinuestoexpand.Thiscausesmanyproblems,
选择性曲解是指人们面对客观事物,经常会不自觉地把外界输人的信息与头脑中早已存在的模式相结合,从而出现根据自己固有的价值体系和既定的情感好恶来解释所接受信息的倾向。根据上述定义,下列属于选择性曲解的是:
假设无税的MM定理成立,那么以下结论不正确的是()。
阅读下列关于群众与英雄的材料材料1规律是为平常人设的,不是为天才设的,在天才表现力量的时候,一切规律的桎梏,立刻就打破了。摘自陈铨《狂飙时代的席勒》材料2社会的进展是靠少数超群绝类的天才,不是靠千万庸碌的群众。天才是民族的灵魂,是群众的救星,没有
AccordingtoUNICEF,around564millionIndians,nearlyhalfthepopulation,stilldefecateintheopen—infields,forests,ne
最新回复
(
0
)