首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2011-02-10
70
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
Why did the Pentagon and Whir House object to the release of the report? Because ______.
选项
A、it may stir a great deal of debate among the Bush Administration
B、every unit of the modern military has depended on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment
C、the Pentagon’s concern was understandable
D、they had different arguments
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/UkcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
Ifbeingcarriedoutsuccessfully,theplanwillcompletelychangethetrafficconditionsinthecity.
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asanideal,theNuclearFamily.Thispresumablyperfect
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asanideal,theNuclearFamily.Thispresumablyperfect
Thegraduatecommitteemustbeinfullaccordintheirapprovalofadissertation.
Fearofviolentcrimesisgreatinthisarea,whichpromptssomerespectivecommunitymemberstoleaveforotherprovinces.
AdiscoveryinNewJerseyactuallycontributedtotheearlyeconomicdevelopmentoftheU.S.and,in1714aworkeruncoveredag
Aleadin5GbyChinesecompaniesshouldspreadtheiradvantageintomorelucrative,matureandstrategicallyinterestingmarket
Inthe1400s,artistsoftencreatedtheirownpigmentsbypulverizingsemipreciousstones.
随机试题
下列血管炎病属于大血管性血管炎的是
药品安全风险管理的主要措施有()
最容易通过血脑屏障的物质是()。
对整治方案通过分析计算难以确定的分汊型石质急滩应进行()。
反索赔的工作内容是()。
督察长的成立应经()的独立董事同意。
下列反映家庭教育中存在的问题的说法有()。
春节居民放鞭炮。有些人把鞭炮扔到井盖里,点燃了井盖内的沼气,导致爆炸,很多居民围观,作为居委会工作人员,领导让你去处理此事。你怎么办?
(1)天下兴亡,匹夫有责(2)鞠躬尽瘁,死而后已(3)人生自古谁无死,留取丹心照汗青(4)海纳百川,有容乃大;壁立千仞,无欲则刚(5)业精于勤,荒于嬉;行成于思,毁于随
对下列对联依次所指的文学家,判断正确的一项是()。①哀怨托离骚,生而独开诗赋立;孤忠报楚国,余风波及汉湘人。②兵甲富于胸中,一代功名高宋室;忧乐关乎天下,千秋俎豆重苏台。③质而绮,真而醇,自可传之千古;樽中酒,篱下诗,
最新回复
(
0
)