首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a gla
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a gla
admin
2018-04-04
95
问题
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a glass of red wine a day will help us live longer. The next day, maybe not. It seems journalists are pretty interested in wine research and the same might be said for coffee. Now, there’s been a lot of research into whether coffee is good for our health. "The results have really been mixed," admits Neal Freedman who led the coffee study and published his findings in a medical journal recently. "There’s been some evidence that coffee might increase the risk of certain diseases and there’s also been maybe more recent evidence that coffee may protect against other diseases as well."
Freedman and his colleagues undertook the biggest study yet to look at the relationship between coffee and health. They analyzed data collected from more than 400,000 Americans ages 50 to 71 participating in the study. "We found that the coffee drinkers had a modestly lower risk of death than those no-drinkers," he said. Here’s what he means by "modestly" : those who drank at least two or three cups a day were about 10 percent or 15 percent less likely to die for any reason during the 13 years of the study. When the researchers looked at specific causes of death, coffee drinking appeared to cut the risk of dying from heart disease, lung disease, injuries, accidents and infections.
Now, Freedman stressed that the study doesn’t prove coffee can make people live longer. A study like this can never prove a cause-and-effect relationship. All it can really do is to point researchers in the right direction for further investigation. And even if it turns out that coffee is really good for you, scientists have no idea why.
According to the author, scientists______.
选项
A、have already proved that coffee is good for human health
B、have a long way to go before they find a way to study coffee
C、have avoided the cause-and-effect approach to study coffee
D、are still unable to figure out why coffee is good for us
答案
D
解析
根据第三段最后一句“And even if it turns out that coffee is really good for you,scientists have no idea why.”可知,科学家们对咖啡有益于人体的原因还没有弄明白,所以选项D正确。选项C干扰性较强,从最后一段第二句可知,科学家们并不是一开始就have avoided the cause-and-effect approach to study coffee,排除C。故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/UiCO777K
0
成人本科学位英语
相关试题推荐
Tomakeupanobjectivetest,theteacherwritesaseriesofquestions,______hasonlyonecorrectanswer.
Forwellover2000yearstheworld’sgreatreligionshavetaughtthevirtuesofatrustingheart.Nowthereisanotherreasonto
Teacherscanhardlybe______carefulwhentheyinstructalesson.
Switzerlandis______aplacetoindulgeinallyourfavoritewintersports;itisalsoamarvelousspottorelax.
______,theprogramwentthroughwithoutanyproblemduringtheperformance.
Hewas______enoughtounderstandmyquestionsfromthegesturesImade.
AsIamsureJennyisveryhonest,I______thatshestolethemoney.
Fromtheverybeginning,waterhasfurnishedmanwithasourceoffoodandahighwaytotravel.Thefirstcivilizationsarose【C1
SYDNEY:Astheysatsharingsweetsbesideaswimmingpoolin1999,ShaneGouldandJessicahSchipperweresimplygettingalongw
Nigel:Hi,Philip.Couldyoulendmetenyuan?Iwanttobuyapacketofcigarette,butIdon’thaveenoughmoney.Myparentsdo
随机试题
个案工作的服务模式是社会工作者针对服务对象开展()的重要依据。
秘书参谋辅助的多维式思维方式
护士在执业过程中,应当遵守
A.两侧乳房轻度增大,结构紊乱,回声增强,分布不均B.乳腺内单发或多发圆形或椭圆形无回声区C.乳腺内可见不均质的多个低回声区D.乳腺内单发低回声团块,回声不均,边界不整E.乳腺内低回声团块,边界光滑,有包膜乳腺纤维瘤的超声表现是
发生在输血l~2小时内最常见的是
《韩熙载夜宴图》有哪些艺术特色?
当枪声平息下来后,我爬出帐篷,看到那名向我要烟的男子脸朝下趴在那里。周围的人说,他已经死了,显然死于心脏病发作。这也是许多刚果人的结局:不死在枪林弹雨中,也会死在各种各样的疾病中。从以上文字推测作者目睹男子死亡的情绪中包含最主要的是()。
某研究机构调查分析了208名有心痛和心律不齐等症状的病人,在开始接受手术治疗时通过问卷报告了自己对病情的看法,其中约20%的人非常担忧病情会恶化,有的人甚至还害怕因此死亡,其他人就没有那么多担忧。后来随访调查表明,那些术前有严重担忧情绪的人术后半年复发率高
两个不透明的布袋A和B里面各放着6个球,其中,布袋A中的球有3个标为数字1,2个标为数字2,1个标为数字3;而布袋B中的球分别标为1、2、3、4、5、6,若某人分别从布袋A和B里取一个球,问这两个球的数字之和不大于3的概率是多少?
工农武装割据理论
最新回复
(
0
)