首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2011-02-10
78
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is ______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/TkcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Hotelsandrestaurantsarean______partofthecity,withoutwhichthetouristindustrycouldnotexist.
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
Wearenotconsciousoftheextentofwhichworkprovidesthepsychologicalsatisfactionthatcanmakethedifferencebetweena
Ourholidayisdoomedtofailurewithoutyou.
Thelistofthingsweneedtothinkaboutwhichwillbe______byclimatechangeisendless.
Mostyoungpeopletodayare,intheeyesoftheoldergeneration,selfishalmostinallrespects.
AdiscoveryinNewJerseyactuallycontributedtotheearlyeconomicdevelopmentoftheU.S.and,in1714aworkeruncoveredag
SincetheIQtestwascreatedfromthepointofviewofEuropeans,peopleofotherracessometimesscoredcomparativelyhigher.
JohnCramer,aresearcherattheUniversityofWashington,hascreatedtwodifferentexpositionsofwhatthebigbangmighthave
随机试题
气逆证可见下列哪些临床表现
单囊型成釉细胞瘤工型的组织学特点是
急性多发性龈脓肿的发病特点,错误的是
依据《大气污染防治法》,大气污染物总量控制区内有关地方人民政府依照国务院规定的条件和程序,按照公开、公平、公正的原则,()。
旅游景点景区内有多个旅游点或者旅游项目的,可以分别设置单一门票,也可以设置价格低于单一门票价格总和的联票或者套票。()
常用的学习策略有哪些?结合实际谈一谈如何运用学习策略进行有效学习。
下列说法哪些是正确的?()
英国打败荷兰,取得“新阿姆斯特丹”的领土,命名为“纽约”(NewYork)。17世纪下半叶,纽约人口愈来愈多并成为商业中心,丰富的农产品得以出口;工业制品的进口,带动当地经济的发展;在缺乏劳力的情况下,纽约成为黑奴市场的大本营,人口贩卖相当盛行。纽约
请使用VC6或使用【答题】菜单打开考生文件夹proj3下的工程proj3,其中声明的IntSet是一个用于表示正整数集合的类。IntSet的成员函数Merge的功能是求当前集合与另一个集合的并集,在Merge中可以使用成员函数IsMemberOf判断_个正
Whatisthewriter’spurposeinReadingPassage1?
最新回复
(
0
)