首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsof
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsof
admin
2012-12-30
45
问题
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! demanding independent proof that they were making promised changes to protect the privacy of users’ search history. They also urged Google to store sensitive search data for only six months instead of nine.
Ten privacy and data-protection commissioners from countries including Canada, Germany and Britain wrote a public letter to Eric Schmidt, Google’s boss, demanding changes in Google Buzz, the firm’s social-networking service, which had been criticised for dipping into users’ Gmail accounts to find "followers" for them without clearly explaining what it was doing. Google promptly complied.
Such run-ins with regulators are likely to multiply and limit the freedom of global Internet firms. It is not just that online privacy has become a controversial issue. More importantly, privacy rules are national, but data flows lightly and instantly across borders, often thanks to companies like Google and Fa-cebook, which manage vast databases.
A recent scandal dubbed "Wi-Figate" exemplifies the problem. Google (accidentally, it insists) gathered data from unsecured Wi-Fi networks in people’s homes as part of a project to capture images of streets around the world. A number of regulators launched investigations. Yet their reaction varied widely, even within the European Union, where member states have supposedly aligned their stance on online privacy. Some European regulators ordered Google to preserve the data it had collected in their bailiwicks; others demanded that information related to their countries be destroyed.
Despite such differences within Europe, the gap is much greater between Europe and America, home to many of the world’s largest online social networks and search engines. European regulations are inspired by the conviction that data privacy is a fundamental human right and that individuals should be in control of how their data are used. America, on the other hand, takes a more relaxed view, allowing people to use consumer-protection laws to seek redress if they feel their privacy has been violated. Companies that handle users’ data are largely expected to police themselves.
Some experts say this dichotomy explains why Silicon Valley firms that strike out abroad have sometimes been the targets of European Union data watchdogs. Jules Polonetsky of the Future of Privacy Forum, a think tank, says that many American firms have yet to learn that showing up in Europe and extolling the virtues of self-regulation is likely to be as ineffective as rightwing politicians denouncing antidiscrimination laws back home.
Transatlantic friction between companies and regulators has grown as Europe’s data guardians have become more assertive. Francesca Bignami, a professor at George Washington University’s law school, says that the explosion of digital technologies has made it impossible for watchdogs to keep a close eye on every web company operating in their backyard. So instead they are relying more on scapegoating prominent wrongdoers in the hope that this will deter others.
But regulators such as Peter Schaar, who heads Germany’s federal data-protection agency, say the gulf is exaggerated. Some European countries, he points out, now have rules that make companies who suffer big losses of customer data to report these to the authorities. The inspiration for these measures comes from America.
Yet even Mr. Schaar admits that the Internet’s global scale means that there will need to be changes on both sides of the Atlantic. He hints that Europe might adopt a more flexible regulatory stance if America were to create what amounts to an independent data-protection body along European lines. In Europe, where the flagship Data Protection Directive came into effect in 1995, before firms such as Google and Facebook were even founded, the European Commission is conducting a review of its privacy policies. In America, Congress has begun debating a new privacy bill and the Federal Trade Commission is considering an overhaul of its rules. David Vladeck.the head of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, has acknowledged that "existing privacy frameworks have limitations".
Even if America and Europe do narrow their differences, Internet firms will still have to grapple with other data watchdogs. In Asia, countries that belong to APEC are trying to develop a set of regional guidelines for privacy rules under an initiative known as the Data Privacy Pathfinder. Some countries such as Australia and New Zealand have longstanding privacy laws, but many emerging nations have yet to roll out fully fledged versions of their own. Mr. Polonetsky sees Asia as "a new privacy battleground", with America and Europe both keen to tempt countries towards their own regulatory model. Shoehorning such firms into antiquated privacy frameworks will not benefit either them or their users.
"Watchdogs" in the first paragraph refers to
选项
A、European data-protection agencies.
B、ten privacy and data-protection commissioners.
C、web guardians in American and Europe.
D、companies such as Google, Microsoft and Yahoo!.
答案
C
解析
推断题。首句指出“Watchdogs are growling at the web giants,and sometimes biting them.”之后,对其进行具体解释说明其中提到“European data—protection agencies wrote to Google,Microsoftand Yahoo!demanding independent proof…”,之后第二段又提及“Ten privacy and data-protectioncommissioners from countries including Canada,Germany and Britain wrote a public letter to EricSchmidt,Google’s boss,demanding changes in Google Buzz…”。可见,开篇首句为主题句,之后作者举例说明,而第三段首句的“Such run-ins with regulators are likely to multiply…”起到承上启下的作用。显然这里的regulators就是指首段提到的watchdogs,而guardians与regulators意思相近,根据例证中提到的范畴可以判断这里说的是欧美的监管机构,故[C]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/SVaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisNOTacaseinEnglish?
TheAmericanFamilyWe’lllearntheAmericanfamiliesfromthefollowingfiveaspects:1.Familystructures1)Immediatefamily
In17th-centuryNewEngland,almosteveryonebelievedinwitches.Strugglingtosurviveinavastandsometimesunforgivingland
Linguistshavefoundthatsignlanguagesandspokenlanguagessharemanyfeatures.Likespokenlanguages,whichuseunitsofsou
AlloftheGreatLakesaresharedbetweentheUnitedStatesandCanadaEXCEPT
Beguninthelate1960sbyPentagonweaponsresearchersasasystemforeasingcommunicationbetweencomputersindisparateelec
AbreakthroughintheprovisionofenergyfromthesunfortheEuropeanEconomicCommunity(EEC)couldbebroughtforwardbyup
Theinterviewismainlyadiscussionconcerning
WhichofthefollowingstatementsconcerningmodernlinguisticsisNOTcorrect?
随机试题
把下面的句子翻译成现代汉语。大道之行也,与三代之英,丘未之逮也,而有志焉。
世界上最早的通讯社哈瓦斯社创办于()
A.手足厥逆,汗出,呼吸微弱,脉微B.手足厥逆,下利清谷,身反不恶寒,面色赤,脉微欲绝C.手足厥逆,恶寒踌卧,下利清谷,神疲欲寐,口不渴,脉沉微细D.手足厥冷,舌淡苔白,脉沉细当归四逆汤主治
糖酵解的最终产物是
甲市政府批复同意本市乙区政府出售乙区某村集体企业的决定,该集体企业的法定代表人是王某。该村村民认为区政府的行为侵犯其经营自主权,遂向法院提起行政诉讼,下列哪一选项是正确的?()
对各项工程的内在品质进行施工前的数据采集,为控制和指导施工提供科学依据的是()。
深圳证券交易所现有质押式企业债券回购品种包括()天回购。
甲卷烟厂为增值税一般纳税人,受托加工一批烟丝,委托方提供的烟叶成本49140元,甲卷烟厂收取含增值税加工费2457元。已知增值税税率为17%,消费税税率为30%,无同类烟丝销售价格,计算甲卷烟厂该笔业务应代收代缴消费税税额的下列算式中,正确的是()。
春花:秋月:江南
Ifyouweretobeginanewjobtomorrow,youwouldbringwithyousomebasicstrengthsandweaknesses.Successorfailureinyo
最新回复
(
0
)