首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2010-07-06
28
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
In Britain, newspapers ______.
选项
A、do the same as American newspapers do
B、are not interested in publishing details about the trial before it takes place
C、are not allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
D、are allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
答案
C
解析
细节题。答案信息对应于第五段第一句,其中的this is virtually never allowed指的就是不允许媒体提前公布与审判有关的细节,即C 。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/SGDd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Inathree-monthperiodlastyear,twoBrooklyniteshadtobecutoutoftheirapartmentsandcarriedtohospitalonstretchers
Whatdoesthespeakersuggestthatthestudentsshoulddoduringtheterm?
A=BOOK1B=BOOK2C=BOOK3D=BOOK4Whichbook(s)say(s)that...theclimateaffectsthefuturesustainableagricultural
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Emmagrewupinafamilywithasailingtradition.
"Junkscience"ishowElliotMorley,Britain’sministerresponsibleforgeneticallymodifiedfarming,describesstudiesthatcla
YourfirmisplanningtoexportcarpetstoGreatBritain.AtarecentconferenceyoumetWilliamLinton,whoisamarketanalyst
LiketheotherpartsofChina,Tianjinhasmaderapidprogressafterliberation,yetsomesaythatTianjinhasnotseenmuchimp
Morethan30,000driversandpassengerswhoseatinthefrontofthevehiclesarekilledorseriouslyinjuredeachyear.At
Ifthepopulationoftheearthgoesonincreasingatitscurrentrate,therewilleventuallynotbeenoughresourcesleftto
随机试题
根据企业破产法律制度的规定,企业被宣告破产后,下列选项中,构成别除权的情形有()。
下列情形中,财政政策的挤出效应比较大的有()。
MyMP4playerisn’tinmybag.Where_______Ihaveputit?()
Revnolds五联征不包括
患者,男,11岁,患儿自幼常有夜间遗尿,每晚有时一次至两次,需家人将其唤醒,形体较瘦弱,精神不振,肢冷畏寒,智力迟钝,腰腿乏力,脉沉细,舌淡。患儿以上这些症状及舌脉表现应辨证为
如图水下有一半径为R=0.1m的半球形侧盖,球心至水面距离H=5m,作用于半球盖上水平方向的静水压力是()。
短时记忆中,对刺激信息主要以视觉形式进行编码和储存。()
巴塞罗那足球俱乐部青训营是世界上最优秀的足球青训营之一。某年该俱乐部在南美洲选拔了57名少年足球队员。这些少年来自南美洲不同国家的7个俱乐部。假设来自A俱乐部的少年足球队员最少,那么来自A俱乐部的少年足球队员至多有多少名?()
下列描述中正确的是
Evenastheeconomyimproves,ajoblessexecutivemayfaceuptoayearormoreofunemployment.Thisisalotoftime,especial
最新回复
(
0
)