首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The economy may be troubled, but one area is thriving: social media. They begin with Facebook and extend through a dizzying arra
The economy may be troubled, but one area is thriving: social media. They begin with Facebook and extend through a dizzying arra
admin
2019-09-23
71
问题
The economy may be troubled, but one area is thriving: social media. They begin with Facebook and extend through a dizzying array of companies that barely existed five years ago: Twitter, LinkedIn, Groupon, Yammer — and the list goes on. These companies are mostly private, but have attracted the ardent attention of Wall Street and investors, with Facebook now worth purportedly US$75 billion and Groupon valued at close to US$25 billion.
There can be little doubt that these companies enrich their founders as well as some investors. But do they add anything to overall economic activity? While jobs in social media are growing fast, there were only about 21,000 listings last spring, a tiny fraction of the 150 million-member U.S. workforce. So do social-media tools enhance productivity or help us bridge the wealth divide? Or are they simply entertaining socially, and diverting us when it comes to national economic health?
The answers are vital, because billions of dollars in investment capital are being spent on these ventures, and if we are to have a productive future economy, that capital needs to grow the economic pie — and not just among the elite of Silicon Valley and Wall Street.
The problem is that these tools are so new that it is extremely difficult to answer the questions definitively. Flash back nearly 20 years and the same question was being asked about the first Internet wave. Were Netscape and the Web enhancing our economy, or were people just spending more time at work checking out ESPN.com? Official statistics weren’t designed to capture the benefits, and didn’t capture them until statistics experts at the Federal Reserve, urged on by Alan Greenspan, refined the way they measured productivity. As a result of these somewhat controversial innovations, the late 1990s became a period of substantial technology-driven gains.
It is possible that the same gap exists today, that social-media tools are indeed laying the groundwork for new industries and jobs, but aren’t yet registering on the statistical radar. Many companies believe social media make them more competitive. Ford and Zappos, for instance, use Twitter to market their products and address consumer complaints.
One big question is what proportion of that benefit will be captured economically by consumers vs. corporations. Sure, social media allow people to compare prices and quality and assess which companies are good to work for and where jobs might be. They also may enhance education and idea sharing, but the caveat is that the people who use these tools are the ones with higher education and income to spend on technology, not the tens of millions whose position in today’s world has eroded so sharply. According to a recent Pew Foundation study, only 45 percent of adults making less than US$30,000 have access to broadband, which is an essential component of using content-rich social media effectively.
And that is the rub. Like so many things these days, social media contribute to economic bifurcation. Dynamic companies are benefiting from these tools, even if the gains are tough to nail down in specific figures. Many individuals are benefiting too, using LinkedIn to find jobs and Groupon to find deals. But now, the irony is that social media widen the social divide, making it even harder for the have-nots to navigate. They allow those with jobs to do them more effectively and companies that are profiting to profit more. But so far, they have done little to aid those who are being left behind. They are, in short, business as usual.
It is critical to know social media’s contribution to national economic health in that______.
选项
A、it makes Silicon Valley more competitive
B、investors from the Wall Street need to know it
C、it is crucial for the future economy of the U.S.
D、it guarantees the benefits of social-media founders
答案
C
解析
推断题。本题需注意段落上下文的语篇衔接。第3段提到,因为数十亿美元的投资流向社交媒体,如果希望未来经济兴盛繁荣,就需要利用资本,增长经济整体实力,因此社交媒体对国家的经济健康发展的贡献,在于它对未来经济发展非常重要。故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/RtMO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
A、正确B、错误B语义的理解和判断。根据原文wecanforcepeopletodothingsforashortperiodoftime,butthatisnotleadership可知,我们虽然可以暂时强迫别人行事,
A、learningplaysanimportantpartinmostaspectsofachild’sdevelopmentandchangeB、therearehardlyanyprinciplesoflear
A、正确B、错误B语义理解题。根据原文MaybeIcouldshowalittlemoreenthusiasm可知讲话者认识到自己对工作的热情程度还需提高。由此可见题干的说法与原文不符,因此是错误的。
A、Thesectionsactivatedbymenandwomen’svoicesaredifferent.B、Women’svoicesaremoreeasilytoidentifyandlistento.C、
WhichofthefollowingisTRUEaboutthegeneralmanagerandhisassistants?
Whichwordcanbeusedtodescribeeconomists’attitudeforAfrica’seconomicfuture?
Peopleplayingviolentgamesmighthaveaggressivethoughtsforamoment.
Whenyougoonasoloadventure,youlearntoexpectthe【C1】_______.However,travelers【C2】______anticipatetheunexpectedcould
Anenergeticmanufacturingsectorpressedforwardwithahugerangeofitems,fromshipsandsteamenginesthroughtextilestot
Marthahadmadeuphermindtobuyherfavoritefurniture,disregardhowmuchmoneyshewouldpay.
随机试题
下列社会关系不属于劳动法调整对象的是()
A.Austin-Flint杂音B.心尖区舒张期隆隆样杂音C.Graham-Steel杂音D.心尖区收缩中、晚期喀喇音肺动瓣相对关闭不全
以下关于药品广告的发布说法错误的是
能够度量招标服务质量的指标有()。
关于水泥混凝土路面施工的说法错误的是()。
根据有关担保的法律规定,属于不得抵押的财产有()。
不属于担任单位会计机构负责人(会计主管人员)的基本条件的是()。
A公司为了扩大经营规模,向银行贷款。银行要求A公司提供担保。A公司同意拿公司的土地使用权、轿车三辆、公司附设的医院以及从B公司租赁的十台机器作抵押,并与银行签订了抵押和贷款合同。在A公司提供的财产中可以作为抵押物的财产包括()。
(1)在考生文件夹下有一个工程文件sjt3.vbp,其功能是:①单击“读数据”按钮,则将考生文件夹下in3.dat文件中的100个正整数读人数组a中。②单击“计算”按钮,则找出这100个正整数中的所有完全平方数(一个整数若是另一个整数的
HowOneSimpleMovementCanLetSliptheSecretsoftheMindBodylanguageisthequiet,secretandmostpowerfullanguageo
最新回复
(
0
)