首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
admin
2018-06-06
86
问题
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant groups think it offers little hope to low-skilled, mostly Hispanic would-be migrants. Right-wingers snarl that it is nothing but an "amnesty" for illegals. Companies, who it had been hoped would support the new compromise, hate it because it imposes bureaucratic burdens on employers. And the left is complaining because it fears it will depress low-end wages. It would be nice to be able to report that opposition across so full a spectrum is a sign that the bill is a well-crafted compromise. In fact, it may well turn out to be doomed.
That would be a pity, because there are some good things in the proposal. Most important, it produces a reasonably fair solution to the problem of what to do about the 12 million or so illegal immigrants already in America, most of them working hard at low-paid and disagreeable jobs. Deporting a population the size of Ohio’s is impossible, economically illiterate and morally wrong. The new bill would make the 12 million legal, and offer them a path, though a winding one, to full citizenship.
The right doesn’t like this, of course, and points out that amnesties(which this really isn’t, given the fines and hurdles involved)have in the past drawn fresh waves of migrants. So the other side of the bargain gives conservatives everything they could wish for in terms of razor-wired fences, surveillance drones, armed border guards and a programme that will force companies to check the legality of their workers. Such measures are probably necessary to win support and rebuild trust in the immigration system. No bill would pass without them.
The bad part of the deal is what happens to would-be immigrants once all those sensors and spy-planes are in place. The bill proposes a dual system. A guest-worker programme would allow 400,000 people a year to enter the country to work for two years, after which they must go home for a year, with a six-year cap on the total time they can spend in America. The other part is a new method of granting residence permits, carrying the right to work. Such "green cards" currently go mostly to relatives of American citizens or to people sponsored by an employer. The bill would bring in a "points" system for 380,000 people a year, similar to those in use in Canada and Australia. Permits for family members would be restricted, to cover only spouses and young children. Employers would have less ability to sponsor the people they need.
There are several problems. One is that extended families help build vibrant communities in a way that guest workers don’t. Second, the government should not be in the business of telling companies whom they ought to hire. There are ways round this, such as awarding points not for specific jobs, but still the problem is that most of the green cards will be used up by Indian software designers, Bosnian engineers or the similarly blessed. America does indeed need such folk, but it also needs legions of the less-skilled, too.
That will continue to mean a large, poorly paid and constantly rotating alien underclass with little stake in American society. On May 23rd, the Senate voted to scale the guest worker programme back to 200,000. So the illegals will keep coming—except that now their journey will be still more dangerous and they will be even further beyond the law. The current bill is better than nothing: but unless it is improved, it will not solve the main problem of the illegals.
What does the word "amnesty"(Para. 1)mean?
选项
A、Favorable policy.
B、Solution.
C、Obstacle.
D、Key initiative.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/QoSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Thirtyyearsago,whenChristianBoerwasfirstlearninghowtoreadwhilegrowingupintheNetherlands,hemadealotofmista
Neverwehadseenanythinglikethisstyleofarchitecturebefore,wethoughtwewerelookingatgiantsculptures,notbuildings
Embracingfailureisaclicheofthebusinessworld.ButasMatthewSyed,ajournalistatTheTimes,showsinanewbook,Black
从目前全球经济发展看,一些重要的特点和趋势值得我们高度重视。主要是:科技进步日新月异,前所未有地提高了人们认识和把握宏观世界和微观世界的能力,为人类推动生产力发展和创造美好生活提供了强大支持;国际生产要素优化重组和产业转移加快,各国经济发展更加紧密地联系在
I’mabouttogetintoaflyingmetalboxinSaoPaulo,andgetoffitinMiami.Thissortofabruptrelocationisstillprettyr
DeclanMayes,PresidentoftheMusicBuyersAssociation,isfuriousatarecentannouncementbytherecordingindustryregarding
在一个通过电话和电脑的快速交流时代,面对面的见面方式显得浪费时间和精力,但是,他们仍然是做事情的重要组成部分。关键词汇:via:通过;face-to-face:面对面。如果能把"Inanageoffastcommunicationviatel
中国坚定不移地走和平发展道路,是基于中国国情的必然选择。1840年鸦片战争以后的100多年里,中国受尽了列强的欺辱。消除战争,实现和平,建设独立富强、民生幸福的国家,是近代以来中国人民孜孜以求的奋斗目标。今天的中国虽然取得了巨大的发展成就,但人口多,底子
A、Halfpastfour.B、Fiveo’clock.C、Halfpastfive.D、Sixo’clock.B
A、IamprettysurethatIwon’tbelate.B、Igiveyoumywordnottobelate.C、I’lltrymybest,sothere’snodoubtthatI’ll
随机试题
指导性计划
小儿营养性缺铁性贫血的主要原因是
甲经乙许可,将乙的小说改编成电影剧本。丙获得该剧本手稿后,未征得甲和乙的同意,将该电影剧本改编成电视剧剧本并予以发表。现问,应如何看待丙的行为?()
下列关于预算编制的说法中,错误的是()。
A注册会计师负责审计X公司2015年度财务报表。X公司以生产、销售超声波打磨器械为主营业务,其产品运送至客户后,派技术部员工前往测试,测试完成后,客户在产品验收单上签字,由技术部员工带回。销售合同规定,客户在产品验收单上签字,销售即告完成,客户应在10日内
关于担保物权,以下说法正确的是()。
为旅游者提供导游服务时,导游人员的头等重要责任是()。
抗日战争进入相持阶段后,日本帝国主义对国民党政府采取的方针是()
•Readthetextbelowfromabrochureforacompanythatrentsoutofficespace.•Inmostofthelines(41-52)thereisoneext
Theconcern(hasbeen)thattheembryobank(mightbe)exploited(byunscrupulous),orthatconceptionmightprecedebirthbyni
最新回复
(
0
)