首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1)It’s a golden age for studying inequality. Thomas Piketty, a French economist, set the benchmark in 2014 when his book, "Capi
(1)It’s a golden age for studying inequality. Thomas Piketty, a French economist, set the benchmark in 2014 when his book, "Capi
admin
2018-05-11
91
问题
(1)It’s a golden age for studying inequality. Thomas Piketty, a French economist, set the benchmark in 2014 when his book, "Capital in the Twenty-First Century", was published in English and became a bestseller. The book mapped the contours of the crisis with a sweeping theory of economic history. Inequality, which had been on the wane from the 1930s until the 1970s, had risen sharply back toward the high levels of the Industrial Revolution, he argued. Now Branko Milanovic, an economist at the Luxembourg Income Study Centre and the City University of New York, has written a comprehensive follow-up. It reinforces how Utile is really known about economic forces of long duration.
(2)In some ways "Global Inequality" is a less ambitious book than "Capital". It is shorter, and written more like an academic working paper than a work of substantial scholarship for a wider readership.
(3)Like Mr Piketty, he begins with piles of data assembled over years of research. He sets the trends of different individual countries in a global context. Over the past 30 years the incomes of workers in the middle of the global income distribution have soared, as has pay for the richest 1% . At the same time, incomes of the working class in advanced economies have stagnated. This dynamic helped create a global middle class. It also caused global economic inequality to plateau, and perhaps even decline, for the first time since industrialisation began.
(4)To help interpret these facts, Mr Milanovic provides the readers with a series of neat mental models. He muses, for instance, that at the dawn of industrialisation, inequality within countries(or class-based inequality)was responsible for the largest gaps between rich people and poor. After industrialisation, inequality across countries(or location-based inequality)became more important. But as gaps between countries become ever more narrow, class-based inequality will become more important as most of the differences in incomes between rich people and poor people will once again be due to gaps within countries. He seasons the discussion with interesting comments, such as how incomes and inequality fell over the course of the Roman Empire.
(5)Mr Milanovic’s boldest contribution is about "Kuznets waves", which he offers as an alternative to two other prevailing theories of inequality. Simon Kuznets, a 20th-century economist, argued that inequality is low at low levels of development, rises during industrialisation and falls as countries reach economic maturity: high inequality is the temporary side-effect of the developmental process. Mr Piketty offered an alternative explanation: that high levels of inequality are the natural state of modern economies. Only unusual events, like the two world wars and the Depression of the 1930s, disrupt that normal equilibrium.
(6)Mr Milanovic suggests that both are mistaken. Across history, he reckons, inequality has tended to flow in cycles: Kuznets waves. In the pre-industrial period, these waves were governed by Malthusian dynamics: inequality would rise as countries enjoyed a spell of good fortune and high incomes, then fall as war or famine dragged average income back to subsistence level. With industrialisation, the forces creating Kuznets waves changed: to technology, openness and policy(TOP, as he shortens it). In the 19th century technological advance, globalisation and policy shifts all worked together in mutually reinforcing ways to produce dramatic economic change. Workers were reallocated from farms to factories, average incomes and inequality soared and the world became unprecedentedly interconnected. Then a combination of forces, some malign(war and political upheaval)and some benign(increased education)squeezed inequality to the lows of the 1970s.
(7)Since then, the rich world has been riding a new Kuznets wave, propelled by another era of economic change. Technological progress and trade work together to squeeze workers, he says: cheap technology made in foreign economies undermines the bargaining power of rich-world workers directly, and makes it easier for firms to replace people with machines. Workers’ declining economic power is compounded by lost political power as the very rich use their fortunes to influence candidates and elections.
(8)This diagnosis carries with it a predictive element. Mr Milanovic expects rich-world inequality to keep rising, in America especially, before eventually declining. Importantly, he argues that the downswing in inequality that occurs on the backside of a Kuznets wave is an inevitable result of the preceding rise. Where Mr Piketty sees the inequality-compressing historical events of the early 20th century as an accident, Mr Milanovic believes them to be the direct result of soaring inequality. The search for foreign investment opportunities engendered imperialism and set the stage for war. There are parallels, if imperfect ones, to the modern economy: rich economies seem to be stagnating as the very rich struggle to find places to earn good returns on their piles of wealth.
(9)Mr Milanovic’s analysis leads him to consider some dark possibilities as he looks ahead. America looks to be falling into the grips of an undemocratic plutocracy(富豪统治), he says, which is dependent on an expanding security state. In Europe right-wing nativism(本土主义)is on the rise. The good news is that emerging economies will probably continue on their path toward rich-world incomes—though that, he allows, is not guaranteed, and could be threatened by political crisis in other markets.
(10)The book’s conclusion is a little unsatisfying. A theory in which rising inequality eventually triggers countervailing social dislocations feels intuitively right, but it also leaves many important questions unanswered. When is war, rather than revolution, the probable outcome of inequality? Are governments at the mercy of the cycle, or can they act pre-emptively to flatten out the waves and avoid crises of high inequality? Mr Milanovic’s contributions are ultimately similar to those made by Mr Piketty. The data he provides offer a clearer picture of great economic puzzles, and his bold theorising chips away at tired economic orthodoxies. But the grand theory does as much to reveal the scale of contemporary ignorance as to illuminate the mechanics of the global economy.
According to Mr. Milanovic, the Kuznets wave in rich countries is currently governed by______.
选项
A、technological progress and trade
B、Malthusian dynamics
C、technology, openness and policy
D、big political changes and improved education
答案
A
解析
细节题。作者在第七段第一句中提到自上世纪70年代以来,富裕国家就一直处在新一轮的“库兹涅茨波浪”之上,并指出这新一轮的“库兹涅茨波浪”是由另一个经济变革时代所推动的,然后在第二句详细解释出现变化的是技术进步和贸易,因此[A]为答案。第六段第三句提到在前工业化时期,“库兹涅茨波浪”是由马尔萨斯动力学控制,故排除[B];第六段第四句指出在工业化时期,生成“库兹涅茨波浪”的力量是技术、开放和政策,第五句进一步强调在19世纪时,技术进步、全球化和政策转变以互相强化的方式共同发挥作用,从而导致巨大的经济变化,故排除[C]和[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/QWoK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
StudyActivitiesinUniversityInordertohelpcollegeanduniversitystudentsintheprocessoflearning,fourkeystudya
A、Becausewestilllacktheevidencetobackthat.B、Becausetherehaven’tbeenenoughnegotiations.C、Becauseweallvalueour
A、Old-agesickness.B、Loosefamilyties.C、Poormentalabilities.D、Difficultiesinmaths.D本题考查McKay教授无法做出解释的内容。McKay教授说“似乎毫无疑问
A、Becausethechildrenrefusetohaveparentslivingwiththem.B、Becausethechildrencanaffordtohavetheirownhomes.C、Bec
听人家背地里谈论,孔乙己原来也读过书,但终于没有进学,又不会营生;于是愈过愈穷,弄到将要讨饭了。幸而写的一笔好字,便替人家抄抄书,换一碗饭吃。可惜他又有一样坏脾气,便是好喝懒作。坐不到几天,便连人和书籍纸张笔研,一齐失踪。如是几次,叫他抄书的人都没有了。孔
(1)AcoupleofyearsagoagroupofmanagementscholarsfromYaleandtheUniversityofPittsburghtriedtodiscoveriftherew
A、Freeticket.B、Freephonecall.C、Cashreward.D、Seatreservation.D本题考查对于主动转乘下一航班的旅客的补偿。根据录音,这样的旅客有可能得到cashbribe或afreetrip
A、Toencouragepeopletowatchhershow.B、Toillustratepeoplemustworkhard.C、Todenynothingistakenforgranted.D、Tosho
Theprocessofacquiringtheself-disciplineforJapanesebeginsinchildhood.Indeed,onemaysayitbeginsatbirth—howearly
随机试题
从一正态总体X中抽取容量为10的样本,假设样本均值与总体均值之差的绝对值在4以上的占2%,求总体的标准差.(附:Ф(2.33)≈0.99)
症见咳吐大量脓痰,或如米粥,或痰血相兼,腥臭异常,胸中烦满而痛,甚则气喘不能卧,身热面赤,烦渴喜饮,舌苔黄腻。舌质红,脉滑数,宜选用
局麻药加人肾上腺素的优点中哪项是错误的
在可行性研究的基本工作步骤中,说法不正确的是( )。
某工程基础施工中出现了意外情况,导致工程量由原来的2800m3增加到3500m3,原定工期是40天,采用比例分析法计算,则承包商可以提出的工期索赔值为()天。
委托其他纳税人代销货物,不能作为增值税纳税义务发生时间的是()。
财产保全,是指人民法院在利害关系人起诉前或者当事人起诉后,为保障将来的生效判决能够得到执行或者避免财产遭受损失,对当事人的财产或者争议的标的物,采取限制当事人处分的强制措施。根据上述定义,下列最可能获得人民法院批准的财产保全申请是()。
决定游客满意程度的是()
【2014年济南市】幼儿行为辅导技术主要是采取()的方法。
试谈“广播电视文艺”与“广播电视艺术”两个概念之间的异同
最新回复
(
0
)