首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Directions: A report revealing the reduced role of the English test in China’s college entrance examination has drawn much publi
Directions: A report revealing the reduced role of the English test in China’s college entrance examination has drawn much publi
admin
2017-11-28
88
问题
Directions: A report revealing the reduced role of the English test in China’s college entrance examination has drawn much public attention. In some provinces, the English test score has been reduced from 150 to 100, and by 2020, the English test will be removed from China’s college entrance exam, according to the Ministry of Education. The students will instead be allowed to take two exams a year and pick the best result for their college admission. What do you think of this test reform and what’s the possible effect it may produce on our English teaching and learning? Write a composition of about 400 words to clarify your own points of view about this topic You should use your own ideas, knowledge or experience to generate support for your argument Write your answer on the answer sheet (30 points)
Note: In the first part of your writing you should state clearly the thesis statement (i. e., your main argument), and in the second part you should support your argument with appropriate details. In the last part you should bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or a summary. Marks will be awarded for content, organization, grammar and appropriateness. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
选项
答案
It is reported that in some provinces of China, the English test score has been reduced from 150 to 100 in the national college entrance examination, known as "Gaokao". And the Ministry of Education has also worked out a plan for phasing out the English test from the "Gaokao" system. Instead, the English test will be held twice a year to allow students in senior high school to choose the best score for their college admission. Such changes made in the English test have aroused a heated discussion among educators, students and parents. Opinions are divided on this test reform. Some people view reducing English weight in overall admissions test scores as a strong measure to cool down nationwide English mania and reverse the prevailing practice in school that gives emphasis to English over Chinese, while others doubt whether the reform would reduce students’ burden of learning English or whether the substitute test could reflect students English skills and help students learn English better. As far as I’m concerned, the test reform is a positive move toward a better "Gaokao" system. The main reason for my point is that the reform changes China’s once-in-a-lifetime exam system by giving students more test-taking chances. As is known to us all, "Gaokao" is the principal method by which most students enter almost all higher education institutions in China, and their performance in the exam will influence them a lot. However, there were always people who were good at English but unluckily performed poorly in the English exam. Owing to this reform, such people can take the English exam for several times and avoid the worst result for their college admission. Therefore, it is no exaggeration to say that this test reform makes the "Gaokao" system more fair and reasonable. What’s more, the change in scores will help relieve students from heavy academic burdens. For many students who are not interested in English, it’s unnecessary for them to spend so much time studying it, and for those who have a passion for English, they can study it in college. Of course, reducing the weight of English in the entrance exam doesn’t mean English is no longer important for Chinese students. Instead, the reform makes us reconsider the proper way for English teaching and learning. The low-end and exam-oriented English teaching and learning has come under heavy criticism for making most English learners dabblers. Indeed, English learners are not taught to gain high scores in tests, but to master the language in a real sense. Therefore, English teaching and learning must be reoriented to lay due emphasis on using English in real life.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/Pdua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
“HehasaservantcalledFriday.”“he”inthequotedsentenceisacharacterin________.
Pocahomta,aseventeenthcenturyPowhatanIndian,wenttotheJamestowncolonyasherfather’semissary.
Australia’sfrogsarehavingtroublefindinglove.Trafficnoiseandothersoundsofcitylife,suchasairconditionersandcon
RobertswasraisedinGeorgia.Herparentsranatheaterschoolthere.Hersisterandbrotherarealsoactors.Thefamilywasal
Initsmoreextremeformspersecutionmaniaisarecognizedformofinsanity.Somepeopleimaginethatotherswishtokill
WithChina’sgrowinginfluenceovertheglobaleconomy,anditsincreasingabilitytoprojectmilitarypower,competitionbetwee
Theideaofculturalpreservationandtheteachingofhumanitiesare______.However,therehasbeenalong-standinglackofempha
Therecomesatimewhenallmonopoliesfalter.Thinkoftelecomsoperatorsorutilities,forexample.ForGoogle,too,itsnear-
Theimportanceandfocusoftheinterviewintheworkoftheprintandbroadcastjournalistisreflectedinseveralbooksthath
Localgovernmentmaintainedtheirgriponpropertyspeculation,implementingtailoredmeasuresinaccordancewiththeirowncond
随机试题
炎症性肠病的发病机制与下列无关的是
消毒染有霍乱弧菌食具的最佳消毒措施是
井巷穿过含水层时对水文地质的观测,要求详细描述的内容包括()。
我国期货交易所总经理具有的权力不包括()。
下列关于证券市场法律法规的表述中,正确的是()。I.《证券法》属于行政法规Ⅱ.《证券公司监督管理条例》和《证券公司风险处置条例》属于行政法规Ⅲ.《证券投资基金法》属于法律Ⅳ.《反洗钱法》属于法律
2/5,-3/7,4/9,-5/11,()
(2017国家35)传统曲艺中一两个演员借助简单的手持道具,靠说唱完成一场表演,没有过硬的功夫不行,不会与观众______更不行。修养高深的曲艺表演者会使用各种手段拉近与观众的情感距离,______引领观众参与艺术创造。在基本没有舞台布景和“灯服道效”相配
Evenwitharockyglobaleconomy,earningsroseforthepoorest40percentofpeoplein60outof83countriesstudiedbetween2
森达集团规定,它的下属连锁分店,年营业额超过800万元的,雇员可获得优秀奖。年终统计显示,该集团所属14个连锁分店,其中7个年营业额超过800万元,其余的不足500万元。森达集团又规定,只有年营业额超过500万元的,雇员才能获得激励奖。如果上述断
TheearliestverticalwindmillswereusedinPersiamorethan2,000yearsagoforthegrindingofgrain.Windmillswereadopted
最新回复
(
0
)