首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
admin
2011-01-10
87
问题
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (1) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (2) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (3) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is (4) in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The (5) of member states are said to be (6) the idea and responded positively to a (6) which followed the (8) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (9) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (10) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (11) , a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (12) quickly.
The Irish government’s (13) to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing (14) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to (15) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period." Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (16) but could (17) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (18) approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to (19) ," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (20) of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU.
The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly.
The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated, "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonization of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
选项
答案
consultation
解析
名词。本题不定冠词a后要求填名词,作后面which定语从句的修饰对象。该词意为“协商,建议”,与文首的proposal相对应。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/PcuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级口译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级口译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
AsoundChina-U.S.relationshipservesthefundamentalinterestofthetwocountriesandtheirpeople,andthepeace,stability
SomepeopleaccusemeofbeingrudebecauseIalwaysintroducemyselftootherpeopleImeetontrains;butlanswerbytelling
Alibaba,China’secommercegroup,hascontinuedastringofdealsthatisdesignedtostrengthenitsappealaheadofanexpected
Therearealsopeoplewhoobjecttofairytalesonthegroundsthattheyarenotobjectivelytrue,thatgiants,witches,two-hea
AsdawnbreaksinHanoithebotanicalgardensstarttofillup.Hundredsofoldpeoplecomeeverymorningtoexercisebeforethe
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenareconfused【C1】______whattheterm"communication"means.
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenareconfused【C1】______whattheterm"communication"means.
随机试题
属兴奋呼吸中枢的药物是
按执行部门分,该年度我国企业部分的“科学研究与试验发展经费支出”约为()。
陈老伯考察郊区某新楼盘时,听销售经理介绍周边有轨道交通19号线,出行方便,便与开发商订立了商品房预售合同。后经了解,轨道交通19号线属市域铁路,并非地铁,无法使用老年卡,出行成本较高;此外,铁路房的升值空间小于地铁房。陈老伯深感懊悔。关于陈老伯可否反悔,下
2017年12月31日,甲公司涉及一项未决诉讼,预计很可能败诉,甲公司若败诉,需承担诉讼费10万元并支付赔款300万元,但基本确定可从保险公司获得60万元的补偿。2017年12月31日,甲公司因该诉讼应确认预计负债的金额为()万元。
如果将证券的期望收益率记作K,且K=α+β.Km,其中Km为市场组合的期望收益率,则根据资本资产定价模型,正确的结论是()。
认真阅读《邹忌讽齐王纳谏》课堂教学实录节选,回答下列问题。生:(读课文)“臣之妻私臣,臣之妾畏臣,臣之客欲有求与臣,皆以美于徐公”:“宫妇左右莫不私王,朝廷之臣莫不畏王,四境之内莫不有求于王。”师:这两组句子,相同的词语是:“私、畏、有
当用户开机按下PC机电源开关时,PC机首先执行的是(46),然后加载(47)。(47)
下面有关测试的说法正确的是(30)。
Conventionalwisdomsaysthatitisbettertobealargecompanythanasmallonewhencreditistight.Biggerfirmshavemorer
A、February20,1909.B、February28,1911.C、March8,1911.D、March8,1914.B短文中提到,第一届美国的国内妇女节是1909年2月28日,成为国际性的节日是在1911年,而日期是在1
最新回复
(
0
)