首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
As the federal government shutdown approaches the two-week mark, it’s become painfully apparent that the public can no longer ru
As the federal government shutdown approaches the two-week mark, it’s become painfully apparent that the public can no longer ru
admin
2020-12-01
47
问题
As the federal government shutdown approaches the two-week mark, it’s become painfully apparent that the public can no longer run amok virtually unsupervised in the national parks. What’s the evidence of that? The litter, vandalism and trampled ground. The human feces overflowing the public toilets and the urine along the roads.
Unlike the last lengthy shutdown in 2013, the Trump administration this time has opted to keep the national parks open but largely unstaffed. Private concession operators and nonprofit groups have helped with maintenance where they can. Some states have dipped into their own
coffers
to keep parks staffed and operating — at least for a while. Many other states, including California, have not.
With tens of thousands of park employees furloughed, that means many parks have no workers collecting entry fees at the gates, patrolling the campgrounds or emptying the garbage cans and portable toilets. But the visitors keep coming. The lack of maintenance and oversight is taking a toll. There are reports of illegal camping and off-road driving in sensitive habitat areas. Unsupervised tourists were harassing elephant seals at the Point Reyes National Seashore, prompting officials to close off part of the beach.
Visitors have posted pictures on social media of overflowing garbage bins. Empty champagne bottles were left strewn on the ground at Joshua Tree. Yosemite officials had to restrict entry to certain areas of the park after the accumulation of human urine and feces became a health hazard. The National Park Service has the authority to turn away visitors for safety, health or environmental protection reasons. That’s what the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks did Wednesday, when they closed large sections because of concerns that visitors could be endangered on icy roads and hiking trails.
And the threat isn’t just to the natural wonders and to public safety. The national parks are full of cultural and historic resources that could be damaged or stolen with so little oversight and protection. During the 2013 shutdown, the Obama administration ordered the national park system completely closed. That was a controversial decision at the time. Visitors who had traveled great distances to visit the parks were turned away. Local businesses that rely on park tourism suffered. Others saw the closures as a political tactic by President Obama to drum up negative publicity for the Republican-led shutdown. But given the damage currently being inflicted on the nation’s most majestic open spaces, temporarily closing some parks might be the best way to protect them.
Indeed, as one former National Park Service director said, keeping the parks open but unstaffed is like leaving
the Smithsonian
open without employees minding the priceless artifacts. It invites abuse and practically guarantees damage to some of the nation’s most treasured public lands.
Yes, it’s a loss to the tourists who planned their vacations around a visit to Yosemite Valley, or who had hoped to hike through the forests of Sequoia National Park. Yes, there will be an economic cost for local communities. But that is the cost of a government shutdown. The political
stalemate
in Washington — the failure of President Trump and congressional leaders to reach a budget deal as they haggle over his insistence on a costly border wall — has real-world consequences.
The nation’s most magnificent public assets shouldn’t be sacrificed to this political battle. It’s worth noting that the national park system already struggles with an $11-billion backlog of deferred maintenance and with massive crowds that stress existing capacity. There are potholed roads, crumbling trails, aging sewer systems in need of repair to prevent contamination of nearby streams. Throwing open the gates to all comers with little control or oversight only exacerbates those problems.
Americans love their national parks, but don’t always treat them with the care they deserve. The parks should shut down until the federal government reopens.
In Paragraph 6, "the Smithsonian" is most likely a______.
选项
A、shop
B、museum
C、hotel
D、library
答案
B
解析
推断题。本句将the Smithsonian与免费开放但无人值守的公园进行了类比,可知两者应该都是公益场所,更何况其中有“价值连城的工艺品”,可以推断是博物馆,故正确答案为B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/OrMO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
A、正确B、错误B特定信息的找寻和判断。根据原文I’vealwaysbeenveryloyaltothecompany可知讲话者认为自己对公司忠心耿耿。由此可见题干的说法与原文不符,因此是错误的。
ArcticConditionsforPolarBearsArcticconditionsmaybecomecriticalforpolarbearsbyendof21stcentury.Shiftsin
UniversalHealthCoverageVocabularyandExpressionsuniversalhealthcoveragepeople-centredcareintegratedservicedel
Accordingtothespeaker,whichoneisNOTtherealreasonforAmericanpeople’sunwillingnesstotakealltheirvacation?
Menaremorelikelythanwomentofakeexpertisetheydon’thave—andrichmenaretheworstculpritswhenit【C1】________tospeak
Humanshavealwayslookedattheheavensand【C1】______aboutthenatureoftheobjectsseeninthenightsky.Withthedevelopmen
Beforethecarwastowedtoawreckingyard,Morriswentthroughtoseeitonemoretime.
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunitytotraveltoSpainthismonthtotraininlesstestin
TheSenseofHumorBiologically,thereisonlyonequalitywhichdistinguishesusfromanimals;theabilitytolaugh.Inaun
A、MostpeopletakemedicinewhentheyhaveapainintheirbrainB、Mostheadachesaresymptomsofailmentsoutsidethebrain.C、
随机试题
如何用对称测量法消除线性系统误差?
简述编写信息系统文档的基本要求。
Theoldideathatchildprodigies(神童)"burnthemselves"or"overtaxtheirbrains"intheearlyyears,therefore,arepreytofail
EveryyearjustafterChristmastheJanuarySalesstart.Alltheshopsreducetheirpricesandfortwoweeks,theyarefullofp
患者女,37岁。因妊娠35﹢周,胎膜早破1h入院。既往体健。曾早孕人工流产1次。住院后常规催产素引产,7h后自然分娩,但产后阴道持续出血约2500ml,血压70/40mmHg,血小板99×109/L,PT15.6秒、APTT59秒、纤维蛋白原8.8g/
患者感到周围的环境失去了色彩和生机,好像与自己隔了一层膜,该表现属于()
《远足》杂志社辩称,乙散文首先发表于国外,不受我国著作权法保护,且《远足》杂志在译文上已署名乙,尊重了作者人身权,杂志社只需向译者甲付款即可。此抗辩理由是否成立?为什么?《远足》杂志社是否构成侵权?如构成侵犯了原作者什么权利?
【背景资料】某施工单位承接了一段二级公路水泥混凝土路面工程施工,路面结构示意图如图2所示。施工单位进场后设立了水泥混凝土搅拌站和工地试验室,搅拌站的配电系统实行分级配电;设置总配电箱(代码A),以下依次设置分配电箱(代号B)和开关箱(
试述商业银行贷款业务的基本规则。
2
最新回复
(
0
)