首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
admin
2013-01-24
40
问题
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs
We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden has a plan, as does a coalition led by Families USA (a liberal advocacy group) and America’s Health Insurance Plans (a trade group). To some extent, all these plans and others aim to provide insurance to the estimated 47 million Americans who lack it—a situation widely deplored as a national disgrace. But the real significance of all these proposals, I submit, lies elsewhere.
For decades, Americans have treated health care as if it exists in a separate economic and political world: when people need care, they should get it; costs should remain out of sight.
About 60 percent of Americans receive insurance through their employers; to most workers, the full costs are unknown. The 65-and-older population and many poor people receive government insurance. Except for modest Medicare premiums and payroll taxes, costs are largely buried in federal and state budgets.
It is this segregation of health care from everything else that is now crumbling—and the various health proposals are just one sign. We see others all the time. For example, even with employer-provided insurance, workers’ monthly premiums (which cover only part of the costs) have skyrocketed. From 1999 to 2006, they doubled from $129 to $248.
Look at Massachusetts. Last year the then Gov. Mitt Romney made headlines by signing legislation to cover all the state’s uninsured. The law required that everyone with incomes three times the federal poverty line buy "affordable" insurance (people with incomes below that threshold would be subsidized on a sliding scale). Romney suggested annual premiums for a single worker might total $2,400. But when insurance companies recently provided real estimates, the cost was much higher: $4,560. Is it a sensible policy to force workers with a $30,000 income— about triple the poverty line— to spend nearly a sixth of their budget on health insurance, as opposed to food, rent or transportation? Good question.
The hard questions won’t sit still, because health care (now a sixth of the economy, up from an 11th in 1980) is too big to be hidden. Myths abound. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the doubling of premiums for employer-provided coverage doesn’t mean companies shifted a greater share of costs to workers. In both 1999 and 2006, premiums covered 27 percent of costs, says Paul Fronstin of the Employee Benefit Research Institute. It’s simply the rapid rise in total health spending that’s depressed workers’ take-home pay.
One myth about the uninsured is that, because they’re heavy users of emergency-room services, providing them with insurance (and regular care) would actually lower their costs. This may be true for some—but not most. The trouble is that the uninsured don’t really use emergency rooms heavily. A study on the journal Health Affairs finds that their use is similar to that of people with private insurance—and half that of people with Medicaid. The upshot is that extending insurance to all the uninsured would be costly, because they would get more and (presumably) better care. John Sheils of the Lewin Group estimates the annual cost of their care would rise 75 percent to $145 billion.
Our health-care system will inevitably combine government regulation and private enterprise. But what should the mix be? Which patients, providers and technologies should be subsidized and why? How important is health care compared with other public and private goals? Will an expanding healthcare sector spur the economy—or, through high taxes and insurance premiums, retard it? We have refused to have this debate for obvious reasons. A friend of mine recently had a near-death experience; he survived only because he had superb medical care. Debating health care makes us queasy, because it pits moral imperatives (including the right to live) against coldhearted economics.
I don’t intend to examine—at least now—all the new proposals. Some would do better at some goals (say, protecting the poor) than at others (say, controlling costs). But the Bush proposal does have one huge virtue: it exposes health-care costs to the broad public. By not taxing employer-paid insurance, the government now provides a huge invisible subsidy to workers. Bush wouldn’t end the subsidy, but by modifying it with specific deductions for insurance ($15,000 for families, $7,500 for singles), he would force most workers to see the costs. By contrast, some other proposals disguise their costs. Schwarzenegger’s plan shifts costs to the federal government, doctors and hospitals. It’s clever, but it perpetuates the illusion that health care is cheap—or even free.
However our health system evolves—with more government control or more market influence—Americans need to come to a more realistic understanding of its limits. Underestimating its costs and exaggerating its benefits guarantees disappointment. If the present outpouring of proposals signals a start of our needed debate, then it is long overdue.
Which of the following is NOT a sign that shows the present situation of American’s health care?
选项
A、The various health proposals.
B、The various benefits it provides.
C、The Massachusetts law by Mitt Romney.
D、The increase of workers’ monthly premiums.
答案
B
解析
由第三和第四段可知,各种各样的健康提议只是反映美国卫生体制的一个信号(A),工人的月保费增长也是一个信号(D),还有马萨诸塞州的情况(C)等等。故B为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/OMaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheEnglishVocabularyVocabularyisacompleteinventoryofthewordsinalanguage.Itcanbedividedintoactivevocabulary
TheEnglishVocabularyVocabularyisacompleteinventoryofthewordsinalanguage.Itcanbedividedintoactivevocabulary
Amongthemanywaysinwhichpeoplecommunicatethroughspeech,publicspeakinghasprobablyreceivedmorestudyandattractedm
Theterm"formallearning"isusedinthispapertorefertoalllearningwhichtakesplaceintheclassroom,withoutregardto
Theterm"formallearning"isusedinthispapertorefertoalllearningwhichtakesplaceintheclassroom,withoutregardto
WiltChamberlainisretirednow,butheusedtobeafamousbasketballplayer.Hehasset65differentrecordsandevenholdsma
YouaregoingtograduatefromUniversity,andduringtheresttimeyouaremoreconcernedwithyouroccupation.What’syourpla
Madrid—ItwasnomistakethatuniversitycampusesproliferatedduringSpain’sdecade-long,construction-ledboomyears.Educatio
随机试题
德育过程的基本矛盾是()
根据《民法典》合同编,下列关于合同效力的说法,正确的有()。
背景安装公司承建某火力发电厂机电安装工程。整个机电工程项目竣工验收完成后,建设单位立即组织进行负荷联动试运行。合同约定:负荷联动试运行期间,安装公司应派相应人员配合保驾。在负荷联动试运行中,发生了冷却循环水系统5号电动阀门关闭时阀底被顶裂事件。在电厂
某独立土方工程,招标文件中估计工程量为100万m3,合同中规定:土方工程单价为5元/m3,当实际工程量超过估计工程量15%时,调整单价,单价调为4元/m3。工程结束时实际完成土方工程量为130万m3,则土方工程款为()万元。
下列关于疏散出口检查内容的叙述中,错误的是()。
(2013年)甲股份有限公司(下称“甲公司”)为上市公司,系增值税一般纳税人,适用增值税税率为17%;适用所得税税率为25%,所得税采用资产负债表债务法核算,当年发生的可抵扣暂时性差异预计未来期间内能够转回;年末按净利润的10%计提法定盈余公积。甲公司20
二级资本不包括()。
其实对于人生、道德、审美以及社会的解释,并无绝对正确的标准答案。每个时代、每个民族,都有提出问题的冲动以及解决问题的能力。满足这种历史需求的,便是所谓的“恰当学术”。你可以嘲笑胡适浅薄,称其提倡的实验主义颇为浅陋,甚至不如学衡派所推销的白璧德的新人文主义精
SecurityconcernshavepromptedthefederaldepartmentsofStateandHomelandSecuritytotightentheprocessforissuingvisas
A、Themanwantsaroomonthethirdfloor.B、Theroomthemanwantsisonthefourthfloor,facingtothesouth.C、Themanwants
最新回复
(
0
)