首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The difficulties facing British Steel have quickly become part of the Brexit debate. Business is naturally cautious about enteri
The difficulties facing British Steel have quickly become part of the Brexit debate. Business is naturally cautious about enteri
admin
2019-11-19
52
问题
The difficulties facing British Steel have quickly become part of the Brexit debate. Business is naturally cautious about entering into political debates, but it should not remain silent when it features so prominently in the public discourse. Industry has a responsibility to ensure its views are accurately represented.
There can be no doubt that the ongoing Brexit uncertainty has contributed significantly to British Steel’ s problems. Unable to decipher what the UK/EU trading relationship will be in just five months’ time, planning has become
fiendishly
complicated for both UK exporters and their EU customers. The timing is particularly bad, with the EU having recently imposed "safeguard" measures to prevent a surge in steel imports resulting from protectionist action elsewhere. Post-Brexit, UK steel exports to Europe will be restricted by these measures, with a disorderly no-deal Brexit affecting them particularly badly.
Then there is the longer-term question of whether a well-managed Brexit could provide any notable benefits to steel producers. There have been claims in recent days about the ability of the UK government to use state aid more extensively to support the steel industry once it is outside the EU. Most importantly, this disregards the fact that the UK steel sector has no interest in operating under the support of state subsidies, and ignores a number of other important technical points.
First, the UK’s ability to provide state aid support will remain restricted, although less so, by its WTO membership, which bans certain subsidies outright, and allows others to be counteracted by other WTO members with the imposition of "anti-subsidy duties"—effectively closing off important export markets. Second, the EU has systematically required alignment on state aid rules in all its FTAs (free trade agreements) since 2006, and a UK-EU FTA would be no different. The US and others would insist on similar provisions in their FTAs with the UK, meaning that if the UK want to take full advantage of their ability to make new trade agreements they will continue to be restricted in their use of state aid.
None of this is to say that the UK can’ t ultimately deliver similar trading conditions outside the EU, depending on the colour of Brexit eventually chosen, simply that a huge amount of effort will be required, and disruption caused, in order to replicate the status quo. In short, it must be honest in stating that Brexit will not improve the situation for the steel sector but it has the potential to cause a great deal of damage. The No. 1 priority to improve the outlook for steel, and the wider manufacturing sector, is to secure a withdrawal agreement as soon as possible, ending this uncertainty and avoiding the turmoil of a no-deal Brexit.
Looking beyond Brexit, many of the measures that could help the steel industry are already within the government’s gift. We have long called on the government to tackle the UK’s sky-high industrial electricity prices, now twice the price of those in France, placing an additional £85m a year cost on the sector, money that should instead be spent on much needed capital investment. Moreover, UK business rates are five to ten times higher than elsewhere in the EU, perversely increasing costs for those that modernise and upgrade. Government must act on these issues and others if they want to secure a sustainable future for steel in the UK.
These are of course challenging times, but the steel sector is an enduring one. Society will continue to require steel and the UK will continue to supply it, provided they are given the right foundations to do so competitively.
Which of the following would be the author’s attitude towards the UK’s steel industry?
选项
A、Skeptical.
B、Supportive.
C、Critical.
D、Opposed.
答案
B
解析
本题考查作者对于英国钢铁工业的态度。从文中可以看出作者对其在英国脱欧后的发展有些担忧,但通过一系列的分析,最终也提出了对英国钢铁工业发展的展望。A项“怀疑的”,C项“批评的”和D项“反对的”均错误,故本题选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/Ny2Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Researchonanimalintelligencealwaysmakesmewonderjusthowsmarthumansare.【B1】______thefruit-flyexperimentsdescribed
Theideathatsomegroupsofpeoplemaybemoreintelligentthanothersisoneofthosehypothesesthatdarenotspeakitsname.
Theideathatsomegroupsofpeoplemaybemoreintelligentthanothersisoneofthosehypothesesthatdarenotspeakitsname.
TheethicaljudgmentsoftheSupremeCourtjusticeshavebecomeanimportantissuerecently.Thecourtcannot【B1】______itslegit
Asmanypeoplehitmiddleage,theyoftenstarttonoticethattheirmemoryandmentalclarityarenotwhattheyusedtobe.We
Idoubtanyonewithcross-culturalexperiencecanreadOslandandBird’sarticlewithoutrememberingamomentwhencarefulcros
Thebirthdayphenomenonfoundamongsoccerplayersismentionedto______.AccordingtoEricsson,goodmemory______.
Canada’spremiers(theleadersofprovincialgovernments),iftheyhaveanybreathleftaftercomplainingaboutOttawaattheir
Canada’spremiers(theleadersofprovincialgovernments),iftheyhaveanybreathleftaftercomplainingaboutOttawaattheir
ThemostthoroughlystudiedintellectualsinthehistoryoftheNewWorldaretheministersandpoliticalleadersofseventeenth
随机试题
不属于原发性肝细胞癌病理分类的是
淋巴瘤原发于膈上,照射部位不包括
计算机的存储器的每个单元容量通常都是()。
()是银行从事经营活动必须注入的资金,可以用来吸收银行的经营亏损,缓冲意外损失,保护银行的正常经营,为银行的注册、组织营业以及存款进入前的经营提供启动资金等。
某生物制药公司年销售净额280万元,息税前利润80万元,固定成本为32万元,变动成本总额为168万元,资产总额为200万元,负债资产比率为40%,综合债务利率为12%,公司的所得税税率为33%。预计3年后,公司的资产总额达到1000万元,负债率会提高到60
下列各项中,属于单方法律行为的有()。
东阳大智禅寺内的释迦牟尼像高达()米,为全国高度第一的室内佛像。
无论当下的生活多么衣食无忧,中国人还是爱假想将来可能遇到的__________,即使这些真正发生的几率接近于零。这只能从中国人___________的传统心理方面进行解释。依次填入划横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
复活节岛是位于太平洋上的一座孤岛。在报道中,复活节岛文明的衰落常作为一个警世故事,讲述人类肆意采伐棕榈树林,致使肥沃的土壤流失,最终导致岛中食物短缺,文明自此衰落。然而近日有专家提出,复活节岛文明的衰落与树木砍伐并无必然联系。以下哪项如果为真,最能支持上
若有以下程序#includeint*f(int*s,int*t){int*k;if(*s
最新回复
(
0
)