首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s
admin
2012-12-01
72
问题
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s Essays. My friend Margaret Rea and I spent hours wandering around Boston discussing the meaning and implications of the essays. Michel de Montaigne lived in the 16th century near Bordeaux, France. He did his writing in the southwest tower of his chateau, where he surrounded himself with a library of more than 1,000 books, a remarkable collection for that time. Montaigne posed the question, "What do I know?" By extension, he asks us all: Why do you believe what you think you know? My latest attempt to answer Montaigne can be found in Everyday Practice of Science: Where Intuition and Passion Meet Objectivity and Logic, originally published in January 2009 and soon to be out in paperback from the Oxford University Press.
Scientists tend to be glib about answering Montaigne’s question. After all, the success of technology testifies to the truth of our work. But the situation is more complicated.
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experiences. Prior knowledge and interests influence what we experience, what we think our experiences mean, and the subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for misinterpretation, error, and self-deception abound.
Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly staked mining claims, they are full of potential. But it takes communal scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher’s me, here, now becomes the community’s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.
Once a discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But, unlike with mining claims, the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public (including other scientists) receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works its way through the community, a dialectic of interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.
Two paradoxes infuse this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not research. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Szent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as "seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought." But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.
In the end, credibility "happens" to a discovery claim — a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind. "We reason together, challenge, revise, and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason," she wrote in a book with that title. In the case of science, it is the commons of the mind where we find the answer to Montaigne’s question: Why do you believe what you think you know?
Paragraph 5 shows that a discovery claim becomes credible after it
选项
A、has attracted the attention of the general public.
B、has been examined by the scientific community.
C、has received recognition from editors and reviewers.
D、has been frequently quoted by peer scientists.
答案
B
解析
推理判断题。题干中的a discovery claim becomes credible对应第五段尾句中的an individua’sdiscovery claim into the community’s credible discovery,可见前面内容是在讲述科学界中发现申明转变成可信的发现需要经历的过程,综合概括这一过程的特征是:需要接受科学界的验证,所以答案选[B]。[A]在文中未提及:[C]和[D]均为discovery claim变成了credible discovery中涉及的一个部分,表述片面。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/NJaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Peopleusuallycommunicatebyspokenandwrittenlanguage,yettheycanalsocommunicatewithoutwordsandthiskindofcommunic
CampaigningontheIndianfrontierisanexperiencebyitself.Neitherthelandscapenorthepeoplefindtheircounterpartsina
IntroductiontoEnglishSynonymsEnglishhasthelargestvocabularyandthemostsynonymsofalllanguagesintheworld.This
ThepreindustrialperiodofthedevelopmentofcitiesintheUnitedStatesbeganwiththeestablishmentofthecoloniesinthe
Whatmightdrivingonanautomatedhighwaybelike?Theanswerdependsonwhatkindofsystemisultimatelyadopted.Twodistinc
Whoiscalled"fatherofEnglishandEuropeannovels"?
A、Theytrytohelpcancerpatientsovercomefright.B、Theyhelpdoctorsbecomesensitivetopatients’feelings.C、Theyhavebeen
A、OttawaCountylake.B、north-centralKansas.C、theKansasEmergencyManagementAgency.D、thetornadoCamper.D本题为细节题,即要求考生判断四个
Airpollutionexistsnotonlyoutdoor,butalsoindoor.Ithasgreateffectsonpeople,andtherearemanymeasurestakentocor
A、anti-discriminationmovementB、environmentalmovementC、non-violencemovementD、humanrightsmovementB
随机试题
简述电子商务网站规划的内容。
火与热的主要区别是
周某从迅达汽车贸易公司购买了1辆车,约定周某试用10天,试用期满后3天内办理登记过户手续。试用期间,周某违反交通规则将李某撞成重伤。现周某困难,无力赔偿。关于李某受到的损害,下列哪一表述是正确的?(2011年卷三第6题)
某单层厂房,吊车轨面标高16m,吊车梁底面标高14m,柱12m,纵向设置双片十字交叉形柱间支撑,中列柱为阶形,下阶为格构式,上阶为工形实腹式,下阶柱肢中距3m,节间尺寸亦为3m,如图所示,采用Q235-B钢,E4303型焊条。
外币存款业务和人民币存款业务的共同点有()。
()是将在一年或在超过一年的一个营业周期内偿还的债务。
毛泽东指出:“红色政权能够在白色政权包围中发生和坚持下来,并且日益发展壮大”的根本原因是()
设A=(α1,α2……αn),B=(β1β2……βn),AB=(γ1,γ2,…,γn)。记向量组(I)α1,α2……αn,向量组(Ⅱ)β1β2……βn,向量组(Ⅲ)γ1,γ2,…,γn。已知向量组(Ⅲ)线性相关,则有()
软件测试的目的是()。
ManypeopleinvestinthestockmarkethopingtofindthenextMicrosoftandDell.However,Iknow【C1】______personalexperienc
最新回复
(
0
)