首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Back in Seattle,around the corner from the Discovery Institute,Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there truly
Back in Seattle,around the corner from the Discovery Institute,Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there truly
admin
2012-07-18
90
问题
Back in Seattle,around the corner from the Discovery Institute,Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there truly is a controversy that must be taught. "The Darwinists are bluffing, "he says over a plate of oysters at a downtown seafood restaurant. "They have the science of the steam engine era,and it’s not keeping up with the biology of the information age. "
Meyer hands me a recent issue of Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews with an article by Carl Woese.an eminent microbiologist at the University of Illinois. In it. Woese decries the failure of reductionist biology—the tendency to Jook at systems as merely the sum of their parts—to keep up with the developments of molecular biology. Meyer says the conclusion of Woese’s argument is that the Darwinian emperor has no clothes.
It’s a page out of the antievolution playbook: using evolutionary biology’s own literature against it, selectively quoting from the likes of Stephen Jay Gould to illustrate natural selection’s downfalls. The institute marshals Journal articles discussing evolution to provide policymakers with evidence of the raging controversy surrounding the issue.
Woese scoffs at Meyer’s claim when I call to ask him about the paper. "To say that my criticism of Darwinists says that evolutionists have no clothes,"Woese says, "is like saying that Einstein is criticizing Newton,therefore Newtonian physics is wrong". Debates about evolution’s mechanisms,he continues, don’t amount to challenges to the theory. And intelligent design "is not science. It makes no predictions and doesn’t offer any explanation whatsoever, except for’God did it’. "
Of course Meyer happily acknowledges that Woese is an ardent evolutionist. The institute doesn’t need to impress Woese or his peers; it can simply co-opt the vocabulary of science—"academic freedom. " "sci-entific objectivity,""teach the controversy"—and redirect it to a public trying to reconcile what ap-pear to be two contradictory scientific views. By appealing to a sense of fairness. ID finds a place at the political table,and by merely entering the debate it can claim victory. "We don’t need to win every argu-ment to be a success, "Meyer says,"We’re trying to validate a discussion that’s been long suppressed. "
This is precisely what happened in Ohio. "I’m not a PhD in biology, "says board member Michael Cochran. "But when I have X number of PhD experts telling me this, and X number telling me the opposite, the answer is probably somewhere between the two. "
An exasperated Krauss claims that a truly representative debate would have had 10000 pro-evolution Scientists against two Discovery executives. "What these people want is for there to be a debate, "says Krauss. "People in the audience say,Hey,these people sound reasonable. They argue, ’people have different opinions, we should present those opinions in school.’That is nonsense. Some people have opinions that the Holocaust never happened, but we don’t teach that in history. "
Eventually, the Ohio board approved a standard mandating that students learn to "describe how scientists continue to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory. "Proclaiming victory, Johnson barnstormed Ohio churches soon after notifying congregations of a new, ID-friendly standard. In response, anxious board members added a clause stating that the standard "does not mandate the teaching or testing of intelligent design."Both sides claimed victory. A press release from IDNet trumpeted the mere inclusion of the phrase intelligent design,saying that "the implication of the statement is that the ’teaching or testing of intelligent design’is permitted. "Some pro-evolution scientists, meanwhile,say there’s nothing wrong with teaching students how to scrutinize theory. "I don’t have a problem with that," says Patricia Princehouse,a professor at Case Western Reserve and an outspoken opponent of ID."Critical analysis is exactly what scientists do."
Why did Meyer initiate the debate between him and Woese as he claimed?
选项
A、To make it possible the alternative use of the vocabulary of science
B、To reconcile what appear to be two contradictory scientific views
C、To claim victory for the views which are so significant
D、To establish the soundness of a discussion that’s been long suppressed
答案
D
解析
题目问:Meyer为什么发起他与沃斯之间的争论?第五段最后一句“‘We don’t need to win every argument to be a success,’Meyer says,‘We’re trying to validate a discussion that’s been long suppressed’.”通过这句话可知,Meyer发起他与沃斯之间的争论,并非要把赢得每一次争论当作胜利,而是试图证实一个长久以来被禁止发表的论述。据此判断,答案是D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/N4nO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Youneedtorewritethissentencebecauseitis______.Thereaderswillhavedifficultyinunderstandingit.
IntheUnitedStatesandinmany【51】countriesaroundtheworld,therearefourmainwaysforpeopletobeinformed【52】develo
Everythingintoday’sworldisgoingfasterandfaster,andtelevisioncommercialsarenoexception.Atthestartofthetelevis
Engineeringstudentsaresupposedtobeexamplesofpracticalityandrationality,butwhenitcomestomycollegeeducationIam
(Nowonder)that(man’s)greatdreamhasbeensomedaytocontroltheweather.Thefirststeptowardcontrolis,ofcourse,knowl
KennyGisnota(musician)Ireallyhad(muchof)anopinionabout(him)(untilrecently).
美国政党唯一的最大弱点是不能在立法机关获得凝聚力。尽管政党内部存在一定的协调性,但是多数党不能执行重要法规的现象并不罕见。在竞选运动期间,存在很强的协调性。初选以后,失利的候选人都承诺要支持党内的候选人。到国会召开会议时,协凋性已经消失。这种现象可以归因于
Diamondsareusuallycuttobringouttheirnaturallusterandtoremoveanyflaws.
现代心理学家对“双赢”解决办法很感兴趣。但在婚姻中,成功更取决于“双输”解决办法。有了这些解决方案,双方就都能获胜。因为在爱的关系中,输是送出一份总会有回报的礼物。婚姻关系中关键的问题是:准将掌握控制权?人们往往把放弃控制权与软弱混为一谈。但在家庭之争中的
InTheDisunitingofAmerica:ReflectionsonaMulticulturalSociety,RevisedandEnlargedEdition(W.W.Norton)Schlesingerpr
随机试题
评价的主要依据是()
可见光的波长范围是()
乳癌淋巴转移的最常见部位是( )。出现皮肤凹陷提示癌肿侵犯了( )。
资料一:基本情况广东东升医疗机械公司(经营单位代码:518994xxxx)在投资总额内,委托广东省机械进出口公司(经营单位代码:512091xxxx)进口设备一批,装载该批货物的运输工具于2005年5月1日申报进口,次日由广东日华公司持“检验检疫货
以下关于年金的说法,错误的是()。
下图是用Word编辑的一段文字,其中没有使用的格式设置是()。
相比那些不踢足球的大学生,经常踢足球的大学生的身体普遍健康些。由此可见,足球运动能锻炼身体,增进身体健康。以下哪项为真,最能削弱上述论断?()
原型化方法实施中,其模型化阶段的重要目的是()。
Artisbothcreationandrecreation.【B1】______MuchasIappreciateallformsofimmortalcreativework,Ithinkthespiritoftr
CarshavebecomehouseholdinChina.Itbringsconvenienceandpollutionatthesametime.Writeacompositionofnofewerthan
最新回复
(
0
)