首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2011-02-11
84
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990. What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not true. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and i990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures --5.2 million now, 5.5 million then--are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’s too early to tell if that’s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups--"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background"-- and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true about the National Jewish Population Survey?
选项
A、It found a decline of 300,000 Jews in ten years.
B、It was carried out by United Jewish Communities.
C、This is the first time United Jewish Communities has made mistakes in the population survey.
D、The reported decline is not reliable.
答案
C
解析
作者在第四段介绍了United Jewish Communities这一组织,并说到This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm,
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/MieO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
MoneyinAmericaMoneyisusedtobuygoodsorservicesand【1】______debts.【1】______InAmerica,moneysupplyconsists
WithTheAdventuresofTomSawyerpublished,MarkTwaingavealiteraryindependencetoTom’sbuddyHuckinaseparatenovelcal
A、BritishB、AmericanC、IndianD、IranianC考查学生对新闻中Indian-born和试题中byorigin的理解。
Afullmoonwasshiningdownonthejungle.AccompaniedonlybyanIndianguide,theAmericanexplorerandarchaeologistEdward
Foraclearerpictureofwhatthestudentknows,mostofteachersuse【M1】______anotherkindofexaminationinadditiontoobje
TheFamilyThenandNowThingswerenevereasywithinthefamily.Butatatimewhenthefamilywasorientedtowardtheprod
TheCinemaThefirstmovingpictures,developedinthe1890’s,weredifferentfromwhatweknowaboutcinematoday.Because
AskanAmericanschoolchildwhatheorsheislearninginschoolthesedaysandyoumightevengetareply,providedyouaskit
Notsurprisingly,interactionamongpeoplesofdifferentculturesisoftenfilledwithuncertaintiesandevendifficulties.Take
随机试题
下列属于仓库的服务功能的是()
在前方、侧方剪应力作用,轴向压缩及屈曲运动时,主要的负重部位是
一小儿身高85cm,头围48cm,乳牙20枚,能跳。能表达自己的意愿。按公式计算此小儿的体重约是
背景资料:某施工单位承接了一座公路隧道的土建及交通工程施工项目,该隧道为单洞双向行驶的两车道浅埋隧道,设计净高为5m,净宽为12m,总长为1600m,穿越的岩层主要由页岩和砂岩组成,裂隙发育,设计采用新奥法施工、分部开挖和复合式衬砌。进场后,项目部与所有
关于信贷承诺的含义,说法不正确的是()。
根据契税法律制度的规定,下列各项中,应当缴纳契税的有( )。
关于非上市公众公司,下列说法不正确的是()。
诸部曲殴伤良人者,加凡人一等。加者,加入于死。奴婢,又加一等。若奴婢殴良人折跌支体及瞎其一目者,绞;死者,各斩。
以下属于形状和方向错觉的是()。
打开http://localhost/web/intro.htm页面,浏览对各个汽车品牌的介绍,找到查看更多汽车品牌介绍的链接,在考生文件夹下新建文本文件search_adress.txt,复制链接地址到search_adress.txt中,并保存。
最新回复
(
0
)