首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Directions: For 30 years, the Darling Chemical Company has got rid of its waste by dumping it in the River Darling or by burning
Directions: For 30 years, the Darling Chemical Company has got rid of its waste by dumping it in the River Darling or by burning
admin
2011-02-28
69
问题
Directions: For 30 years, the Darling Chemical Company has got rid of its waste by dumping it in the River Darling or by burning it. Most of the people living in Darling work for the company, so there have been a few complaints. The local radio station has interviewed five people about their views on the issue. For questions 61 to 65, match the name of each person to one of the statements ( A to G) given below. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1.
Mrs. Sue Pearson:
We don’t want to be here, but what can we do? You see, last year my husband found out that he had cancer. Doctors advised us to leave Darling. We planned to buy a farm 50 miles away. But before we could save enough money for the deposit, he lost his job. Now I can’t see how we’ll ever be able to get away from him. I don’t know what to do.
George Clark:
I certainly do not accept that my company is responsible. We can’t be responsible. It is an absolutely ridiculous opposition. If people choose to work here or live nearby, they must accept the risks. We did not bring the company to the town. The town grew up round the chemical factory. And part of the reason the town is such a thriving community today, is because of my company. Of course, there is a little pollution. There is always pollution in the chemical industry. It can’t be helped because this country needs chemicals — without this company 3,000 people would be jobless.
Richard Carr:
I think the Darling Chemical Company should be held fully responsible for the trouble and the suffering they have brought to the local people. We are suing for over a million pounds in compensation, and we are also asking for a court order to close the factory. I’m confident that we shall win. What worries me is that it’s impossible to stop this kind of thing until it’s too late. I think the government should have introduced strict pollution controls long ago.
Linda Jackson:
I think pollution is a crime against society and must be punished. Already many towns are worse than Darling. If we don’t act soon, this country will be uninhabitable. I propose to fix strict limits for discharge of pollution. All companies which exceed these limits negligently will pay heavy fines. All companies which exceed the limits deliberately will be closed and their managers will go to prison.
Graham Paterson:
Pollution from the factories is not the only problem. Motor vehicles and aircraft pollute the air. Oil tankers pollute the sea. Many city governments discharge sewage into their rivers and leave mountains of garbage in the countryside. Pollution occurs everywhere and it is getting worse and worse. However, all of this could be avoided. There are engines which do not cause air pollution. Garbage can be recycled and sewage can be converted to energy. Private companies won’t make the necessary investments. This money really does have to come from the government.
Now match each of the persons to the appropriate statement.
Note: There are two extra statements.
Statements
A. I think pollution is a crime against society and must be punished.
B. I strongly demand that the chemical factory be closed by legal means, and that the government be criticized for not introducing strict pollution controls.
C. The coming pollution of the environment is one of the biggest problems we are facing now.
D. I think the Darling Chemical Company should be responsible for my husband’s illness.
E. I think that pollution is a widespread problem but that it could be avoided if the government makes the necessary investments.
F. I do not accept that my company is responsible for anything, and people in Darling should be grateful to his company for providing 3,000 jobs.
G. It is generally believed that environmental pollution has adverse effects on human health.
Mrs. Sue Pearson
选项
答案
D
解析
Mrs.Sue Pearson的丈夫去年查出患有癌症,她认为这与化工厂有关,因此要Darling Chemical Company负责。故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/Kctd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语三级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语三级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
AccordingtoPeterSalovey,YalepsychologistandauthorofthetermEQ,IQgetsyouhiredandEQgetsyoupromoted.Salovey
Thesocialsciencesareflourishing.Asof2005,therewerealmosthalfamillionprofessionalsocialscientistsfromallfields
Amongtheraftofbooks,articles,jokes,romanticcomedies,self-helpguidesandotherwritingsdiscussingmarriage,somefamil
Amongtheraftofbooks,articles,jokes,romanticcomedies,self-helpguidesandotherwritingsdiscussingmarriage,somefamil
Properarrangementofclassroomspaceisimportanttoencouraginginteraction.Mostofushavenoticedhowimportantphysicalse
Thedemoralizingenvironment,decrepit(老朽的)buildingandminimalmaterialsmakethehighschoolexperienceforthesechildrenan
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】______peoplegetolder
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】______peoplegetolder
NomanhasbeenmoreharshlyjudgedthanMachiavelli,especiallyinthetwocenturiesfollowinghisdeath.Buthehassincefoun
Wheredoestheconversationtakeplace?
随机试题
社会资本再生产的核心问题是社会总产品的()
斧斤以时入山林,材木不可胜用也。
张女士,25岁,16岁初潮,月经史:8~10天/1~3个月,量中等,无痛经,婚后夫妻同居3年未孕,经夫妇双方检查,男方精液常规正常,女方阴道通畅。宫颈红,呈颗粒状,宫颈口见透明分泌物,官体后位,正常大小、活动,附件未及异常,基础体温测定呈单相。为其提供
下列不属于银屑病的临床分型的是
张某将邻居李某和李某的父亲打伤,李某以张某为被告向法院提起诉讼。在法院受理该案时,李某的父亲也向法院起诉,对张某提出索赔请求。法院受理了李某父亲的起诉,在征得当事人同意的情况下决定将上述两案并案审理。在本案中,李某的父亲居于什么诉讼地位?
坝体边坡线放样中,各个断面上料桩的标定通常采用()。
北方股份有限公司(以下简称北方公司)为增值税一般纳税人,适用的增值税税率为17%(假定凡资料中涉及的其他企业,需缴纳增值税的,适用的增值税税率均为17%)。2015年和2016年北方公司发生如下经济业务:(1)2015年1月1日,北方公司应收南方
甲与乙签订一份货款为人民币50万元的买卖合同,并依约定交付给乙定金人民币15万元。后乙违约没有履行该合同。乙应返还给甲人民币()。
资本主义经济管理和社会主义经济管理都具有二重性。()
下列不属于选官制度的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)