首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The National Geographic Channel is often praised for its meticulous science documentaries, but a show that aired last month focu
The National Geographic Channel is often praised for its meticulous science documentaries, but a show that aired last month focu
admin
2015-03-25
40
问题
The National Geographic Channel is often praised for its meticulous science documentaries, but a show that aired last month focusing on the blockbuster video game Spore is coming in for harsh criticism. Surprisingly, the toughest critics are some of the scientists who appear in the film itself. They say that they were not informed before taking part that it would focus on a commercial product. " I literally never heard about Spore until I saw myself on television in this info-mercial about the game," says Cliff Tabin, a geneticist at Harvard University. "It’s an outrage. "
The documentary, titled How to build a Better Being, which aired on 9 September, puts Spore and its creator, Will Wright, front and center. Over the course of the 1-hour show, Wright visits several U. S. -based academic scientists to discuss their research. Between these scientific interludes, the documentary returns to Wright and Spore. "Journey into the billion-year history of the human body, led by computer game visionary Will Wright as he explores the breakthrough science that’s revealing the secret genetic machinery that shapes all life in the game Spore," reads a description of the film on the National Geographic Channel’s Web site.
Tabin, along with Neil Shubin, a paleontologist at the University of Chicago in Illinois, and Michael Levine, a geneticist at the University of California, Berkeley, sent Science identical e-mails from the film’s producers inviting them to take part. The e-mail describes the documentary as an investigation of "recent discoveries in evolutionary science" with no mention of Spore or Wright. "I thought I was being interviewed for a documentary about evolutionary biology," says Shubin, who appears to be playing the game in the film. "They didn’t mention Spore until we were in the middle of the interview. ...I sat there with Will Wright as he fiddled with it," he says. "I don’t endorse video games, particularly one that claims to be about evolution. "
Ellen Stanley, National Geographic’s communications vice president, says there was no intent to mislead the participants. "Our producers were transparent with all of the scientists," she says. The production of such a documentary takes "several months" she adds, and "the idea for the film evolves during that process. "
Spore is described in the film as "one of the most ambitious games ever, simulating the process of evolution," and a DVD of the film is included in the $80 "Galactic Edition" of the game. "There’s no question that the impression one gets from watching the film is that Spore is scientifically based and that scientists endorse this as not only a valid representation of how life on earth arose but moreover a really cool way that kids can learn about it," says Tabin. But "the science is told in the most superficial way and not really explained or clarified," he says. "And then it becomes more about this computer game designer than it is about the science. "
"We had a great time partnering with the folks over at National Geographic," wrote a spokesperson for Electronic Arts in an e-mail to Science. "However, we don’t typically discuss business terms of our partnerships. "
We may infer from the second paragraph that
选项
A、Will Wright is the producer of the film.
B、the description of the film on the Website is an advertisement of Spore.
C、Will Wright visited the scientists to learn something about biology.
D、the documentary is a film of 150 minutes.
答案
B
解析
推理判断题。根据题干提示定位至第二段。该段介绍了纪录片的情况以及国家地理频道网站对纪录片的描述。由该段首句的puts Spore and its creator,Will Wright可知,威尔.怀特是游戏Spore的制作者,而不是纪录片的制作者,故[A]错误;由over the course of the 1一hourshow可知,纪录片持续了一小时,而不是150分钟,故[D]错误;由上下文可知,这个纪录片对游戏Spore进行了宣传,威尔·怀特并不是为了学习生物学知识而拜访科学家的,故[C]错误。纪录片宣传Spore,主要是为其做广告,因此[B]正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/KQ74777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Humansareuniqueintheextenttowhichtheycanreflectonthemselvesandothers.Humansarea-bleto1,tothinkinabstract
Thefollowingparagraphsaregiveninawrongorder.ForQuestions41-45,youarerequiredtoreorganizetheseparagraphsintoa
Accordingtotheauthor,theAmericaneconomyThestrongtoneofU.S.economicrecoveryismanifestedin
Whenwomendobecomemanagers,dotheybringadifferentstyleanddifferentskillstothejob?Aretheybetter,orworse,manag
Whenwomendobecomemanagers,dotheybringadifferentstyleanddifferentskillstothejob?Aretheybetter,orworse,manag
ThesuccessofAugustusowedmuchtothecharacterofRomantheorizingaboutthestate.TheRomansdidnotproduceambitiousblu
Itwouldhavebeenimpossible,completelyandentirely,foranywomantohavewrittentheplaysofShakespeareintheageofSha
Cancerisataleoftwosetsofgeneticcode,yourownandyourtumor’s—andtracingtheuniqueareasofdamagemakesforawayt
Theageatwhichyoungchildrenbegintomakemoraldiscriminationsaboutharmfulactionscommittedagainstthemselvesorothers
I______themeetingyesterday,butsomeurgentmatterpreventedmefromcoming.
随机试题
在施工组织总设计的编制程序中,计算主要工种工程的工程量后,其下一项工作为()。
大面积烧伤休克期病人出现烦躁,多由于_______。
男,67岁。咳嗽、咳痰20年,加重伴气短1周。查体:T36.8℃,双肺呼吸音减弱,语音震颤减弱,叩诊呈过清音。该患者最可能的诊断是()
在价值工程中,功能评价是指可靠地实现用户要求功能的()成本。
学校()聘用曾经因故意犯罪被依法剥夺政治权利的人担任工作人员。
刑事强制工作,是依据《刑事诉讼法》对犯罪嫌疑人所采取的()。
A.条件(1)充分,但条件(2)不充分B.条件(2)充分,但条件(1)不充分C.条件(1)和条件(2)单独都不充分,但条件(1)和条件(2)联合起来充分D.条件(1)充分,条件(2)也充分E.条件(1)和条件(2)单独都不充分,条件(1)和条件(2
【F1】AneditorIknowoncetoldmethatonaweekdayafternoon,duringaperiodwhenhewasfreelancing,helookedoutfromther
若有定义:inta,b;,通过语句scanf("%d;%d",&a,&b);能把整数3赋给变量a、5赋给变量b的输入数据是()。
风筝是一种传统的民间娱乐工具,起源于春秋时期(theSpringandAutumnPeriod),距今已有两千余年的历史。一般用竹木做骨架,上面粘上画有图案的纸或者绢(silk),并用细线绑住。它最初主要应用于军事,宋朝以后放风筝成为民间极为流行的
最新回复
(
0
)