首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
IF YOU want something done, the saying goes, give it to a busy person. It is an odd way to guarantee hitting deadlines. But a pa
IF YOU want something done, the saying goes, give it to a busy person. It is an odd way to guarantee hitting deadlines. But a pa
admin
2017-04-27
44
问题
IF YOU want something done, the saying goes, give it to a busy person. It is an odd way to guarantee hitting deadlines. But a paper recently published in the Journal of Consumer Research suggests it may, in fact, be true—as long as the busy person conceptualises the deadline in the right way.
Yanping Tu of the University of Chicago and Dilip Soman of the University of Toronto examined how individuals go about both thinking about and completing tasks. Previous studies have shown that such activity progresses through four distinct phases: pre-decision, post-decision(but pre-action), action and review. It is thought that what motivates the shift from the decision-making stages to the doing-something stage is a change in mindset.
Human beings are a deliberative sort, weighing the pros and cons of future actions and remaining open to other ideas and influences. However, once a decision is taken, the mind becomes more "implemental" and focuses on the task at hand. "The mindset towards ’where can I get a sandwich’," explains Ms Tu, "is more implemental than the mindset towards ’should I get a sandwich or not?’"
Ms Tu and Dr Soman advise in their paper that "the key step in getting things done is to get started." But what drives that? They believe the key that unlocks the implemental mode lies in how people categorise time. They suggest that tasks are more likely to be viewed with an implemental mindset if an imposed deadline is cognitively linked to "now"—a so-called like-the-present scenario. That might be a future date within the same month or calendar year, or pegged to an event with a familiar spot in the mind’ s timeline(being given a task at Christmas, say, with a deadline of Easter). Conversely, they suggest, a deadline placed outside such mental constructs(being "unlike-the-present")exists merely as a circle on a calendar, and as such is more likely to be considered deliberatively and then ignored until the last minute.
To
flesh out
this idea, the pair carried out five sets of tests, with volunteers ranging from farmers in India to undergraduate students in Toronto. In one test, the farmers were offered a financial incentive to open a bank account and make a deposit within six months. The researchers predicted those approached in June would consider a deadline before December 31st as like-the-present. those approached in July, by contrast, received a deadline into the next year, and were expected to think of their deadline as unlike-the-present. The distinction worked. Those with a deadline in the same year were nearly four times more likely to open the account immediately as those for whom the deadline lay in the following year. Arbitrary though calendars may be in parsing up the continuous flow of time, humans parse their concept of time in line with
them
.
The effect can manifest itself in even subtler ways. In another set of experiments, undergraduate students were given a calendar on a Wednesday and were asked to suggest an appropriate day to carry out certain tasks before the following Sunday. The trick was that some were given a calendar with all of the weekdays coloured purple, with weekends in beige(making a visual distinction between a Wednesday and the following Sunday). Others were given a calendar in which every other week, Monday to Sunday, was a solid colour(meaning that a Wednesday and the following Sunday were thus in the same week, and in the same colour). Even this minor visual cue affected how like-or unlike-the-present the respondents tended to view task priorities.
These and other bits of framing and trickery in the research support the same thesis: that making people link a future event to today triggers an implemental response, regardless of how far in the future the deadline actually lies. If the journey of 1,000 miles starts with a single step, the authors might suggest that you take that step before this time next week.
Which is the closest to the meaning of the underlined phrase "flash out" in PARAGRAPH FIVE?
选项
A、Put forward.
B、Dream up.
C、Add details to.
D、Come up with.
答案
C
解析
词义题。flesh out的原义是“充实,具体化”。根据第五段第一句可知这里是对上文的观点作进一步具体解释,为了证明上面的观点,与C项add details to的意思吻合。put forward“提出”;dream up“想起,想象出”;come up with“提出,想出”,均不符合,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/K93v777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
下列属于情感目标表述的是()。
简述《义务教育历史课程标准(2011年版)》“知识与能力”目标的具体内容。
AskingstudentstoexplainnewwordsinatextwithknownwordsisNOTanactof______.
Backintheolddays,whenIwasachild,wesataroundthefamilyroundtableatdinnertimeandexchangedourdailyexperience
WhichofthefollowingisNOTasuitablepre-readingactivity?
Wefindthatbrightchildrenarerarelyheldbackbymixed-abilityteaching.Onthecontrary,boththeirknowledgeandexperienc
Severaldecadesago,theUSsociologistswentsofarastodevelopaseriesofuniversalfacialimagessupposedtorepresentthe
—Youdidn’tattendthepartylastnight?—No,I______,forthepartywasputoffforsomereason.
ChinesewriterCaoWenxuanwasawardedtheChristianAndersonAwardin2016,makinghimselfthefirstChinese______suchaprize.
Whichofthefollowingdonotbelongtothesametypeaccordingtothemannerorplaceofarticulation?
随机试题
临时用电组织设计及变更时必须经过的批准人是()。
氢燃料的优点是什么?
将水喷洒于空气中而使空气减湿,应该使水温()。
大树移植时,对较大的落叶乔木如杨、柳等进行强行修剪,树冠可剪去_______以上。
社会学习理论的主要代表人物是【】
试述动机与行为之间的关系。
慢性炎症时,浆细胞内的玻璃样物质是
杭州月亮有限公司HangzhouMoonCo.Ltd.是一家流通性外贸企业,2005年12月15日收到德国KKKCo.Ltd.的订单如下:ORDERNO.:040426DATE:14Dec,2005SUPPLIER:H
生产物流计划的任务有:()。
十字军东征(南京大学2001年世界古代中世纪史真题)
最新回复
(
0
)