首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
One school night this month I sidled up to Alexander, my 15-year-old son, and stroked his cheek in a manner I hoped would seem c
One school night this month I sidled up to Alexander, my 15-year-old son, and stroked his cheek in a manner I hoped would seem c
admin
2014-12-11
69
问题
One school night this month I sidled up to Alexander, my 15-year-old son, and stroked his cheek in a manner I hoped would seem casual. Alex knew better, sensing by my touch, which lingered just a moment too long, that I was sneaking a touch of the stubble that had begun to sprout near his ears. A year ago he would have ignored this intrusion and returned my gesture with a squeeze. But now he recoiled, retreating stormily to his computer screen. That, and a peevish roll of his eyes, told me more forcefully than words, Mom, you are so busted!
I had committed the ultimate folly: invading my teenager’s personal space. "The average teenager has pretty strong feelings about his privacy," Lara Fox, a recent young acquaintance, told me with an assurance that brooked no debate. Her friend Hilary Frankel chimed in: "What Alex is saying is: ’This is my body changing. It’s not yours.’" Intruding, however discreetly, risked making him feel babied "at a time when feeling like an adult is very important to him", she added.
O.K., score one for the two of you. These young women, after all, are experts. Ms. Frankel and Ms. Fox, both 17, are the authors of Breaking the Code (New American Library), a new book that seeks to bridge the generational divide between parents and adolescents. It is being promoted by its publisher as the first self-help guide by teenagers for their parents, a kind of Kids Are From Mars, Parents Are From Venus that demystifies the language and actions of teenagers. The girls tackled issues including curfews, money, school pressures, smoking and sibling rivalry.
Personally, I welcomed insights into teenagers from any qualified experts, and that included the authors. The most common missteps in interacting with teenagers, they instructed me, stem from the turf war between parents asserting their right to know what goes on under their roof and teenagers zealously guarding their privacy. When a child is younger, they write, every decision revolves around the parents. But now, as Ms. Fox told me, "often your teenager is in this bubble that doesn’t include you".
Ms. Fox and Ms. Frankel acknowledge that they and their peers can be quick to interpret their parents’ remarks as dismissive or condescending and respond with a hostility that masks their vulnerability. "What we want above all is your approval," they write. "Don’t forget, no matter how much we act as if we don’t care what you say, we believe the things you say about us."
Nancy Samalin, a New York child-rearing expert and the author of Loving Without Spoiling (McGraw-Hill, 2003), said she didn’t agree with everything the authors suggested but found their arguments reasonable. "When your kids are saying, ’You don’t get it, and you never will’, there are lots of ways to respond so that they will listen," she said, "and that’s what the writers point out."
As for my teenager, Alex, Ms. Fox and Ms. Frankel told me I would have done better to back off or to have asked "Is your skin feeling rougher these days?"
A more successful approach, the authors suggest in their book, would have been for the mother to offer, as Ms. Fox’s own parents did, a later curfew once a month, along with an explanation of her concerns. "My parents helped me see," Ms. Fox told me, "that even though they used to stay out late and ride their bicycles to school, times have changed. These days there is a major fear factor in bringing up kids. Parents worry about their child crossing the street."
The writers said they hoped simply to shed light on teenage thinking. For their parents it did. Reminded by Ms. Fox that teenagers can be quite territorial. Her father, Steven Fox, a dentist, said, "These days I’m better about knocking on the door when I want to come into Lara’s room." "I try to talk to her in a more respectful way, more as an adultish type of teenager rather than a childish type of teenager," he added.
The sentence in the sixth paragraph "You don’t get it, and you never will" implies that
选项
A、the teenagers think that their parents will never understand them.
B、it’s teenagers’ excuse to disguise their vulnerability of being under custody.
C、the generation gap can not be shortened despite their parents’ efforts.
D、the parents do not necessarily force into the world of their children.
答案
B
解析
推理判断题。第五段首句提到青少年对父母的言辞通常是respond with a hostility that maskstheir vulnerability,而“You don’t get it,and you never will”正是孩子们对父母说的话,由此可以推断孩子们这样说是为了用敌对的态度来掩饰他们的脆弱,故答案为[B]。本题考查的是句子的言外之意而非字面意思,可排除[A]。[C]、[D]属过度推断,可排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/K3dO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ThingstobeTaughtinEverySchoolI.Introduction:Importanceofstudents’abilitytodealwiththerealworld.A.Speaker’so
Twohalf-brothers,SirHumphreyGilbertandSirWalterRaleigh,werethefirstEnglishmentoundertakeseriousventuresinAmeri
Formostpeoplewhohavesleepingtroubles,whichofthefollowingisthemostusualcause?
AspectsThatMayFacilitateReadingI.DeterminingyourpurposeA.Readingfor(1)_____:(1)______likereadingthelatestHa
Thewordconservationhasathriftymeaning.Toconserveistosaveandprotect,toleavewhatweourselvesenjoyinsuchgoodc
AccordingtoDr.Adams,whatshouldwehaveasanattainablegoaloflanguagelearning?
______,thefirstcollectionofJackLondon’sshortstoriesbyJackLondon,waspublishedin1900.
Revisionisrethinking,buttwomisconceptionsarebynomeansuncommonamongwriters,especiallyamongdevelopingwriters.Firs
WhatdoesMr.Stevensonthinkofhisprofession?
随机试题
组织中人的心理与行为层次不包括()
女性,30岁,双手、足心可见对称性红斑上成群淡黄色针头至粟粒大小脓疱。反复发作5年。掌部初发于大小鱼际,后渐扩展至掌心。部分脓疱已经干涸、结痂及脱屑,鳞屑下反复出现成群新疱。
未成年人的父母已经死亡或者没有监护能力的,可由()担任监护人。
对事故的原因进行分析,有分散注意力行为属于造成事故的间接原因。
对持久性污染物,以下方程适用的是()。
关于运用评价中心进行人员选拔的陈述,正确的是()。
()是指员工对自己的工作所抱有的一般性的满足与否的态度。
(2015·福建)胆汁质的小丁冲动、粗心又鲁莽;黏液质的小林冷静、认真又稳重。可见小林的气质类型比小丁的好。
邓小平说:“证券、股市,这些东西究竟好不好,有没有危险,是不是资本主义独有的东西,社会主义能不能用?允许看,但要坚决地试。看对了,搞一两年对了,放开;错了,纠正,关了就是了。”这段话主要反映的是()。
2005年因全球石油需求大增、产油国遭恐怖袭击和政局动荡、国际原油期货市场的投机性交易增加而引发国际石油价格持续上涨,3月涨至每桶57.60美元,8月又涨至每桶67美元,最高达每桶70美元。在国际石油供求关系趋紧的条件下,石油生产国发生恐怖袭击,政局
最新回复
(
0
)