2. 考研
  3. This history of responses to the work of the artist Sandro Botticelli(1444 -1510) suggests that widespread appreciation by criti

This history of responses to the work of the artist Sandro Botticelli(1444 -1510) suggests that widespread appreciation by criti

admin2019-08-01  53
问题     This history of responses to the work of the artist Sandro Botticelli(1444 -1510) suggests that widespread appreciation by critics is a relatively recent phenomenon. Writing in 1550, Vasari expressed an unease with Botticelli’s work, admitting that the artist fitted awkwardly into his evolutionary scheme of the history of art. Over the next two centuries, academic art historians defamed Botticelli in favor of his fellow Florentine, Michelangelo. Even when anti-academic art historians of the early nineteenth century rejected many of the standards of evaluation adopted by their predecessors, Botticelli’s work remained outside of accepted taste, pleasing neither amateur observers nor connoisseurs. (Many of his best paintings, however, remained hidden away in obscure churches and private homes.)
    The primary reason for Botticelli’s unpopularity is not difficult to understand; most observers, up until the mid-nineteenth century, did not consider him to be noteworthy, because his work, for the most part, did not seem to these observers to exhibit the traditional characteristics of fifteenth-century Florentineart. For example, Botticelli rarely employed the technique of strict perspective and, unlike Michelangelo, never used chiaroscuro. Another reason for Botticelli’s unpopularity may have been that his attitude toward the style of classical art was very different from that of his contemporaries. Although he was thoroughly exposed to classical art, he showed little interest in borrowing from the classical style. Indeed, it is paradoxical that a painter of large-scale classical subjects adopted a style that was only slightly similar to that of classical art.
    In any case, when viewers began to examine more closely the relationship of Botticelli’s work to the tradition of fifteenth-century Florentine art, his reputation began to grow. Analyses and assessments of Botticelli made between 1850 and 1870 by the artists of the Pre-Raphaelite movement, as well as by the writer Pater (although he, unfortunately, based his assessment on an incorrect analysis of Botticelli’s personality), inspired a new appreciation of Botticelli throughout the English-speaking world. Yet Botticelli’s work, especially the Sistine frescoes, did not generate worldwide attention until it was finally subjected to a comprehensive and scrupulous analysis by Home in 1908. Home rightly demonstrated that the frescoes shared important features with paintings by other fifteenth-century Florentines—features such as skillful representation of anatomical proportions, and of the human figure in motion. However, Home argued that Botticelli did not treat these qualities as ends in themselves—rather, that he emphasized clear depletion of a story, a unique achievement and one that made the traditional Florentine qualities less central. Because of Home’s emphasis crucial to any study of art, the twentieth century has come to appreciate Botticelli’s achievements.
Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?
选项 A、Botticelli’s Contribution to Florentine Art.
B、Botticelli and the Traditions of Classical Art.
C、Sandro Botticelli; From Defame to Appreciation.
D、Botticelli and Michelangelo: A Study in Contrasts.
答案C
解析 主旨题。[A]“波提切利对佛罗伦萨画派的贡献”不是文章讨论的重点；[B]“Botticelli和古典画派的传统”不是本文所探讨的内容；[D]“波提切利和米开朗基罗：比较研究”不对，文章只是简单地提及两者的不同。全文先写了波提切利最初不受欣赏的情况，后文又提到他名声日渐增长，[C]“波提切利：从受诋毁到被欣赏”正确表达了文章的中心内容，故为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/K22Z777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)