2. 考研
  3. Texting has long been lamented as the downfall of the written word, "penmanship for illiterates," as one critic called it. To wh

Texting has long been lamented as the downfall of the written word, "penmanship for illiterates," as one critic called it. To wh

admin2022-07-26  4
问题     Texting has long been lamented as the downfall of the written word, "penmanship for illiterates," as one critic called it. To which the proper response is LOL. Texting properly isn’t writing at all—it’s actually more akin to spoken language. And it’s a "spoken" language that is getting richer and more complex by the year.
    Historically, talking came first; writing is just an artifice that came along later. While talk is largely subconscious and rapid, writing is deliberate and slow. Over time, writers took advantage of this and started crafting sentences such as this one, from The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire: "The whole engagement lasted above 12 hours, till the gradual retreat of the Persians was changed into a disorderly flight, of which the shameful example was given by the principal leaders and the Surenas himself."
    No one talks like that casually—or should. But it is natural to desire to do so for special occasions. In the old days, we didn’t much write like talking because there was no mechanism to reproduce the speed of conversation. But texting and instant messaging do—and a revolution has begun. It involves the brute mechanics of writing, but in its economy, spontaneity and even vulgarity, texting is actually a new kind of talking. There is a virtual cult of concision and little interest in capitalization or punctuation. The argument that texting is "poor writing" is analogous, then, to one that the Rolling Stones is "bad music" because it doesn’t use violas.
    Texting is developing its own kind of grammar. Take LOL. It doesn’t actually mean "laughing out loud" in a literal sense anymore. LOL has evolved into something much subtler and sophisticated and is used even when nothing is remotely amusing. Jocelyn texts "Where have you been?" and Annabelle texts back "LOL at the library studying for two hours." LOL signals basic empathy between texters, easing tension and creating a sense of equality. Instead of having a literal meaning, it does something-conveying an attitude—just like the -ed ending conveys past tense rather than "meaning" anything. LOL, of all things, is grammar.
    Civilization is fine—people banging away on their smartphones are fluently using a code separate from the one they use in actual writing, and there is no evidence that texting is ruining composition skills. Worldwide people speak differently from the way they write, and texting—quick, casual and only intended to be read once—is actually a way of talking with your fingers.
According to the text, which of the following statements is true of writing?
选项 A、Writing is merely a duplicate of talking.
B、Writing is less important than talking.
C、Writing is formal and carefully-worded.
D、Writing was separated from talking in the past.
答案C
解析 第三段首句认为，No one talks like that casually(若不刻意，人们不会像那样说话)，反过来说明写作是非casually的，是正式的；第二段第二句表明，写作是deliberate(刻意的)，即C项所说的carefully-worded，因此C项为正确答案。A项duplicate表明写作仅是说话的复制，与原文不符，如果仅仅是复制，后面就不需要进行二者的对比分析。B项认为写作不如说话重要，这是对原文talking came first的曲解。因为这里就是单纯的时间先后，并不是重要性的问题。D项separate完全割裂了写作与说话的关系，而第二段首句指出写作是在说话之后才出现的一种技巧，二者具有历史的延续关系，与原文不符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/JLmZ777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)