首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to the new school of scientists, technology is an overlooked force in expanding the horizons of scientific knowledge.
According to the new school of scientists, technology is an overlooked force in expanding the horizons of scientific knowledge.
admin
2010-07-06
74
问题
According to the new school of scientists, technology is an overlooked force in expanding the horizons of scientific knowledge. Science moves forward , they say, not so much through the insights of great men of genius as because of more ordinary things like improved techniques and tools. In short, a leader of the new school contends , the scientific revolution, as we call it, was largely the improvement and invention and use of a series of instruments that expanded the reach of science in innumerable direction.
Over the years, tools and technology themselves as a source of fundamental innovation have largely been ignored by historians and philosophers of science. The modern school that hails technology argues that such masters as Galileo, Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, and inventors such as Edison attached great importance to, and derived great benefit from, craft information and technological devices of different kinds that were usable in scientific experiments.
The centerpiece of the argument of a technology-yes, genius-no advocate was an analysis of Galileo’s role at the start of the scientific revolution. The wisdom of the day was derived from Ptolemy, an astronomer of the second century, whose elaborate system of the sky put Earth at the center of all heavenly motions. Galileo’s greatest glory was that in 1609 he was the first person to turn the newly invented telescope on the heavens to prove that the planets revolve around the sun rather than around the earth. But the real hero of the story, according to the new school of scientists, was the long evolution in the improvement of machinery for making eyeglasses.
Federal policy is necessarily involved in the technology vs. genius dispute. Whether the Government should increase the financing of pure science at the expense of technology or vice versa often depends on the issue of which is seen as the driving force.
Over the years, tools and technology themselves as a source of fundamental innovation have largely been ignored by historians and philosophers of science.
选项
答案
工具和技术本身作为根本性创新的源泉多年来在很大程度上被历史学家和科学思想家们忽视了。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/JCDd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Miserabilists’fearofchange;idealists’hopeforabetterworld;anall-purposeadultnostalgiaforlostyouth;allthesethin
Austerityisawordoftenfoundonthelipsofpoliticiansandeconomistsatthemoment,butitisseldomheardfromtechnologis
Austerityisawordoftenfoundonthelipsofpoliticiansandeconomistsatthemoment,butitisseldomheardfromtechnologis
Austerityisawordoftenfoundonthelipsofpoliticiansandeconomistsatthemoment,butitisseldomheardfromtechnologis
Agingbabyboomersaredeterminedtofighttheagingprocess.Theyspendmillionsofdollarsayearon【C1】________theyperceive
Agingbabyboomersaredeterminedtofighttheagingprocess.Theyspendmillionsofdollarsayearon【C1】________theyperceive
WhatcanbesaidaboutthereportbytheNationalAcademyofSciences?
HowdoesAusubelfeelaboutthescientificprogressmadeeveryday?
HowdoesAusubelfeelaboutthescientificprogressmadeeveryday?
TheauthorbeginshisarticlewithEdmundBurke’swordsto______.Misguidedpeopletendtothinkthatusingananimalinresea
随机试题
双人复苏时,心脏按压次数和口对口人工呼吸次数的比为_____。
鼓胀病变脏器主要在
患者,女性,26岁,2周前曾感冒发热,1周前出现双下肢无力。查体:颅神经正常,双上肢正常,双下肢肌力3级,双膝腱反射、跟腱反射减弱,双Babinski征(一)。其病变的部位最可能是( )
女,38岁。接触性出血半年。妇科检查:外阴、阴道无异常,宫颈轻触之易出血。子宫正常大双侧附件未触及异常。如检查结果为鳞状上皮内高度病变(HSIL),首选的处理方法是
异烟肼的主要不良反应是
负债类账户的记账规则有()。
奖金是企业以现金的形式给予付出超额劳动的员工的薪酬,其类型主要有()。
投资组合由证券X和证券Y各占50%构成。证券X的期望收益率12%,标准差12%,β系数1.5。证券Y的期望收益率10%,标准差10%,β系数1.3。下列说法中,正确的有()。(2020年卷Ⅰ、卷Ⅱ)
如右图所示,△ABC是等腰直角三角形,AB=12,AD的长度是CD的2倍,四边形EBCD与△AED的面积之比为3:2,问AE的长度是多少?()
SpareaKidney?Itisnolongerunusualforaspouseorrelativetodonateakidneyt0alovedone,butthenumberofAmer
最新回复
(
0
)