首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
admin
2011-02-03
125
问题
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below. Since then those users have been frantically trying to re-establish contact. They rely on Envisat’s radars and other sensors for a wide range of measurements, from the temperature of the oceans to the chemistry of the stratosphere. Scientists have used it to gauge ocean conditions for shipping and to investigate earthquakes; its data have been the basis of thousands of scientific papers.
Envisat had, unlike much of Europe, forgone early retirement: designed for five years of operation, it was on its tenth. Given its advanced years, you would think that planning for its eventual end would be well in hand. You would expect that successor instruments would already be in orbit, their measurements carefully cross-correlated with Envisat’s so that the elucidation of the scope and pace of global environmental change could continue seamlessly. You would be wrong.
Wilful blindness
Providing earthlings with a reliable, continuous record of their planet’s condition would seem a sensible aim in any circumstances. With the state of the atmosphere and oceans upset in ways whose consequences are not easily foreseen, and may well prove catastrophic, it becomes an imperative. You do not need to know every little thing about the environment in order to make policy about it. But only long-term measurements will allow researchers to get a reliable grip on the science of climate change and other environmental stresses. A firm grasp of the basic trends is a necessary precondition for understanding and for informed policy.
The governments that build and operate satellites like Envisat are not taking that necessity seriously. According to a damning report from America’s National Academies, the number of civilian Earth-observing satellites flown by the United States government looks likely to fall from 23 today to just 6 in 2020, and the number of instruments in orbit could drop from 90 to 20. The situation in Europe is somewhat less disastrous, but has its own problems. The European Space Agency is unwilling to move forward with a new generation of satellites that can monitor the environment continuously until the European Union promises to pay their operating costs.
Several of the parties involved must share the blame for this failure. The scientists who have a say in setting the priorities for Earth observation often fixate on pet projects and new sorts of measurement, as scientists are not to do; that can lead to the vital business of long-term monitoring getting downplayed. Co-operation and co-ordination between agencies and countries is not what it should be. Then there is bad luck (or poor judgment): in recent years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) lost two Earth-observing missions in a row because of a second-rate rocket for which it has yet to find an adequate replacement.
But the main culprits are governments, which are spending too little on the job. In 2010 the World Meteorological Organisation estimated that getting satellite observations up to scratch in terms of climate monitoring would cost an extra $1 billion a year. In the late 1990s NASA used to spend $2 billion a year on Earth observations, but by 2007 that had fallen to $1.3 billion (the costs of a successor to the Hubble Space Telescope rose from around $2 billion to $9 billion over roughly the same period). Properly co-ordinated, modest increases in the budget in America and the EU, and contributions from other powers (China is now flying very capable Earth-observing satellites; India and Brazil have been in the game for a while), could sort the problem out. Without them, the world will feel its way into the future blind and ill-prepared.
From The Economist, May 12, 2012
What happened to the satellite?
选项
A、It stopped communicating with Earth.
B、It collided with rocks in space.
C、It lost electric power.
D、It fell out of the earth’s orbit.
答案
A
解析
本题为细节题。第一段“unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.Since then those users have been frantically trying to re—establish contact.”一句可以推断正确答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/J01K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
—What’sthematterwiththewallpaper?—Itneeds______.
Thesoldiersstoppedattheedgeofawood,______wastherightplaceforanambush.
Whatisthetalkmainlyabout?
Researchershaveestablishedthatwhenpeoplearementallyengaged,biochemicalchangesoccurinthebrainthatallowittoact
NowyoucanuseanykindoftreetofeedyourwildfriendsduringtheChristmasholidays.Sharethebountiesoffoodwiththewi
Theyear1400openedwithmorepeacefulnessthanusualinEngland.Onlyafewmonthsbefore,RichardII,weak,wicked,andtreac
Theyear1400openedwithmorepeacefulnessthanusualinEngland.Onlyafewmonthsbefore,RichardII,weak,wicked,andtreac
TheEnglishlanguageexistsinaconditionofeverlastingdanger,itsAmericanbranchmostparticularly,assaultedasitisfrom
Thatexperiencesinfluencesubsequentbehaviorisevidenceofanobviousbutneverthelessremarkableactivitycalledremembering
TheMiddleEasthascalleda"museumofreligiousandlinguistichistory."TheoriginandgrowthoftheCoptsintheNilevalley
随机试题
碳弧气刨时可以使用大功率的整流焊机。
对“全面从严治党”的理解正确的是()
患者男,72岁。吸烟40余年,反复咳嗽、咳痰30年,活动后气短13年,出现双下肢水肿5年。超声心动图显示右心室肥厚、右心室流出道增宽。慢性肺源性心脏病最常见的病因是
河北某公司向北京仲裁委员会申请仲裁其与北京某企业间的买卖合同纠纷,仲裁委员会受理了申请。北京某企业为逃避责任,出示了一份伪造的证人证言,仲裁庭根据这份证人证言,裁决申请人河北某公司赔偿被申请人损失的50万元。河北某公司不服该裁决,并且在收到仲裁裁决后发现了
建设工程安全生产管理,坚持安全第一、预防为主的方针。()
甲公司为增值税一般纳税人,主要从事电子产品及配件的研发、生产和销售,适用的增值税税率为17%。除特别注明外,销售价格均为不含增值税价格。甲公司财务报告在报告年度次年的3月20日对外公布。假定不考虑除增值税以外的其他税费。(1)甲公司2015年12月与
下列各项中,属于投资活动产生的现金流量的有()。(2015年)
头脑风暴法的优点是()。
ReadthefollowingarticleinwhichfivepeopletalkaboutAIDS.ForQuestion61to65,matchthenameofeachpersontooneof
Fromchildhoodtooldage,wealluselanguageasameansofbroadeningourknowledgeofourselvesandtheworldaboutus.When
最新回复
(
0
)