首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Does the Internet Make You Dumber? [A]The Roman philosopher Seneca may have put it best 2,000 years ago: "To be everywhere is to
Does the Internet Make You Dumber? [A]The Roman philosopher Seneca may have put it best 2,000 years ago: "To be everywhere is to
admin
2014-06-30
68
问题
Does the Internet Make You Dumber?
[A]The Roman philosopher Seneca may have put it best 2,000 years ago: "To be everywhere is to be nowhere. " Today, the Internet grants us easy access to unprecedented amounts of information. But a growing body of scientific evidence suggests that the Net, with its constant distractions and interruptions, is also turning us into disrupted and superficial thinkers.
[B]The picture emerging from the research is deeply troubling, at least to anyone who values the depth, rather than just the velocity(速度), of human thought. People who read text studded with links, the studies show, comprehend less than those who read traditional linear text. People who watch busy multimedia presentations remember less than those who take in information in a more sedate(镇定的)and focused manner. People who are continually distracted by e-mails, alerts and other messages understand less than those who are able to concentrate. And people who juggle(尽力同时应付)many tasks are less creative and less productive than those who do one thing at a time.
[C]The common thread in these disabilities is dispersing our attention. The richness of our thoughts, our memories and even our personalities hinges on our ability to focus the mind and sustain concentration. Only when we pay deep attention to a new piece of information are we able to associate it "meaningfully and systematically with knowledge already well established in memory," writes the Nobel Prize winning neuroscientist(神经科学家)Eric Kandel. Such associations are essential to mastering complex concepts.
[D]When we’re constantly distracted and interrupted, as we tend to be online, our brains are unable to generalize the strong and expansive neural connections that give depth and distinctiveness to our contemplating. We become mere signal-processing units, quickly shepherding disjointed bits of information into and then out of short-term memory.
[E]In an article published in Science last year, Patricia Greenfield, a leading developmental psychologist, reviewed dozens of studies on how different media technologies influence our cognitive abilities. Some of the studies indicated that certain computer tasks, like playing video games, can enhance "visual literacy skills" , increasing the speed at which people can shift their focus among icons and other images on screens. Other studies, however, found that such rapid shifts in focus, even if performed adeptly, result in less rigorous and "more automatic" thinking.
[F]In one experiment conducted at Cornell University, for example, half a class of students was allowed to use Internet-connected laptops during a lecture, while the other had to keep their computers shut. Those who browsed the Web performed much worse on a subsequent test of how well they retained the lecture’s content. While it’s hardly surprising that Web surfing would distract students, it should be a note of caution to schools that are wiring their classrooms in hopes of improving learning.
[G]Ms. Greenfield concluded that " every medium develops some cognitive skills at the expense of others. " Our growing use of screen-based media, she said, has strengthened visual-spatial intelligence, which can improve the ability to do jobs that involve keeping track of lots of simultaneous signals, like air traffic control. But that has been accompanied by " new weaknesses in higher-order cognitive processes," including " abstract vocabulary, mindfulness, reflection, inductive problem solving, critical thinking, and imagination. " We’re becoming, in a word, shallower.
[H]In another experiment, recently conducted at Stanford University’s Communication between Humans and Interactive Media Lab, a team of researchers gave various cognitive tests to 49 people who do a lot of media multitasking and 52 people who multitask much less frequently. The heavy multitaskers performed poorly on all the tests. They were more easily distracted, had less control over their attention, and were much less able to distinguish important information from trivial.
[I]The researchers were surprised by the results. They had expected that the intensive multitaskers would have gained some unique mental advantages from all their on-screen juggling. But that wasn’t the case. In fact, the heavy multitaskers weren’t even good at multitasking. They were considerably less adept at switching between tasks than the more infrequent multitaskers. " Everything distracts them," observed Clifford Nass, the professor who heads the Stanford lab.
[J]It would be one thing if the ill effects went away as soon as we turned off our computers and cellphones. But they don’t. The cellular structure of the human brain, scientists have discovered, adapts readily to the tools we use, including those for finding, storing and sharing information. By changing our habits of mind, each new technology strengthens certain neural pathways and weakens others. The cellular alterations continue to shape the way we think even when we’re not using the technology.
[K]The pioneering neuroscientist Michael Merzenich believes our brains are being "massively remodeled" by our ever-intensifying use of the Web and related media. In the 1970s and 1980s, Mr. Merzenich, now a professor emeritus at the University of California in San Francisco, conducted a famous series of experiments on primate brains that revealed how extensively and quickly neural circuits change in response to experience. When, for example, Mr. Merzenich rearranged the nerves in a monkey’s hand, the nerve cells in the animal’s sensory cortex quickly reorganized themselves to create a new "mental map" of the hand. In a conversation late last year, he said that he was profoundly worried about the cognitive consequences of the constant distractions and interruptions the Internet bombards us with. The long-term effect on the quality of our intellectual lives, he said, could be " deadly".
[L]What we seem to be sacrificing in all our surfing and searching is our capacity to engage in the quieter, attentive modes of thought that underpin contemplation, reflection and introspection. The Web never encourages us to slow down. It keeps us in a state of perpetual mental locomotion. It is revealing, and distressing, to compare the cognitive effects of the Internet with those of an earlier information technology, the printed book. Whereas the Internet scatters our attention, the book focuses it. Unlike the screen, the page promotes contemplativeness.
[M]Reading a long sequence of pages helps us develop a rare kind of mental discipline. The innate bias of the human brain, after all, is to be distracted. Our predisposition is to be aware of as much of what’s going on around us as possible. Our fast-paced, reflexive shifts in focus were once crucial to our survival. They reduced the odds that a predator would take us by surprise or that we’d overlook a nearby source of food.
[N]To read a book is to practice an unnatural process of thought. It requires us to place ourselves at what T. S. Eliot, in his poem "Four Quartets" , called "the still point of the turning world". We have to forge or strengthen the neural links needed to counter our instinctive distractedness, thereby gaining greater control over our attention and our mind.
[O]It is this control, this mental discipline, which we are at risk of losing as we spend ever more time scanning and skimming online. If the slow progression of words across printed pages damped our craving to be inundated by mental stimulation, the Internet indulges it. It returns us to our native state of distractedness, while presenting us with far more distractions than our ancestors ever had to contend with. —Nicholas Carr is the author, most recently, of "The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains".
When we turn off our computers and cellphones, the ill effects will not disappear.
选项
答案
J
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/IZ17777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Somestudentsarenotadequatelypreparedforcollege.Shouldweturnthemaway?【B1】______them?Ormodifyourproduct?American
A、Nevercontinuallyplantingcropsatthesameplace.B、Lettinganimalsfeedonthesamelandsyearafteryear.C、Plantingtrees
Knowledgemaybeacquiredthroughconversation,watchingtelevisionortravelling,butthedeepestandmostconsistentwayisth
A、Athome.B、Inatelephonebooth.C、Atameeting.D、Inthehospital.B关键词和短语有hangup、coins、theline、cut,答案为B。
Allourdreamshavesomethingtodowithourfeelings,fears,longings,wishes,needsandmemories.Ifapersonishungry,orti
秦始皇是中国统一后的第一位皇帝,他统治中国的时间是公元前246至公元前210年。在他35年的统治下,他成功创建了壮观又巨大的建筑工程。他促进了文化和思想上的发展,同时也对中国造成了很大的破坏。应该记住他创造的功绩还是他的暴政是一个很有争议性的问题,但是每个
黄山位于安徽省的南部。它有72座山峰,它被认为是世界上最独特,最美丽的山脉之一,是中国十大风景名胜里唯一的一座山。在中国,如果你爬山,就爬黄山吧!黄山风景四绝:云海、怪石、奇松和温泉。黄山。被称为“中国最美的山”,是中国著名历史上艺术和文学的一部分。现在游
Oilisthesubstancethatlubricatestheworld’seconomy.Becausesomanyofourmoderntechnologiesandservicesdependonoil,
A、Asportingevent.B、Adoctor’sappointment.C、Agrammarexercise.D、Agymexercise.B男士说“你跟她谈了有关你耳朵的毛病了吗?”并结合女士的话可知对话中讲的都是身体健康
A、Itsbeautifulboyscycleelegantlybetweenthefamouscanals.B、Itscharmingmalescatchtheheartsoffemaletourists.C、Its
随机试题
男性,56岁。2年来消瘦、乏力,近5天来发热、嗜睡,1天来意识障碍急诊入院,既往患乙型肝炎多年,吸烟史20年。查体:T37.5℃,P86次/分,R20次/分,BP120/80mmHg,神志不清,巩膜轻度黄染,颈软,心肺检查未见异常,腹平软,肝肋下未及,脾肋
A.具体的、没有时间限制的目标B.可测量的目标C.不可完成的目标D.宏观的目标,是努力的方向E.没有时间限制的目标属于健康促进的总体目标特点的是
上海某百货公司向天津某食品厂购买一批儿童奶粉,合同对付款地点和交货期没有明确规定,发生争议,依相关法律规定,下列说法哪项是正确的?()
防雷接地按规范接地电阻是( )。
下列有关纳税申报的具体要求,说法正确的是()。
《信条》原文下面是我的信条:我真正需要知道的一切,即怎么样生活、怎样做事和怎样为人,我在幼儿园就学过。智慧并不在高等学府的大山顶上,倒是出自每日学校里孩子们玩的沙堆中。下面就是我学到的东西。有东西大家分享。公平游戏。不打人。交还你捡到的东西。
随着学习任务的难度增加,动机的最佳水平的变化趋势是()
“万物皆备于我”是()的观点。
现在有些地方政府委托社会调查机构制定地方法规。经过政府审核后批准实施。你对此的看法?
A向B发送消息P,并使用公钥体制进行数字签名。设E表示公钥,D表示私钥,则B要保留的证据是(31)。基于数论原理的RSA算法的安全性建立在(32)的基础上。Kerberos是MIT为校园网设计的身份认证系统,该系统利用智能卡产生(33)密钥,可以防止窃
最新回复
(
0
)