首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
During the first 70 years of the 20th century, inequality declined and Americans prospered together. Over the last 30 years, by
During the first 70 years of the 20th century, inequality declined and Americans prospered together. Over the last 30 years, by
admin
2011-03-10
68
问题
During the first 70 years of the 20th century, inequality declined and Americans prospered together. Over the last 30 years, by contrast, the United States developed the most unequal distribution of income and wages of any high-income country.
Some analysts see the gulf between the rich and the rest as an incentive for strivers, or as just the way things are. Others see it as having a corrosive effect on people’s faith in the markets and democracy. Still others contend that economic polarization is a root cause of America’s political polarization. Could, and should, something be done?
Claudia Goldin and Lawrence F. Katz, two Harvard economists, think yes. Their book, the Race Between Education and Technology (Harvard, $ 39.95), contain many tables, a few equations and a powerfully told story about how and why the United States became the world’s richest nation--namely, thanks to its schools.
The authors skillfully demonstrate that for more than a century, and at a steady rate, technological breakthroughs--the mass production system, electricity, computers--have been increasing the demand for ever more educated workers. And, they show, America’s school system met this demand, not with a national policy, but in grassroots fashion, as communities taxed themselves and built schools and colleges.
If only it were that easy.
The authors’ argument is really two books in one. One offers an incisive history of American education, especially the spread of the public high school and the state university system. It proves to be an uplifting tale of public commitment and open access. The authors remind us that the United States long remained "the best poor man’s country". A place where talent could rise.
The other story rigorously measures the impact of education on income. The authors’ compilation of hard data on educational attainment according to when people were bona is an awesome achievement, though not always a gripping read.
They show that by the 1850s, America’s school enrollment rate already "exceeded that of any other nation". And this lead held for a long time. By 1960, some 70 percent of Americans graduated from high school--far above the rate in any other country. College graduation rates also rose.
In the marketplace, such educational attainment was extremely valuable, but it didn’t produce wide economic disparity so long as more people were coming to the job market with education. The Wage premium-- or differential paid to people with a high school or a college education--fell between 1915 and 1950.
But more recently, high school graduation rates flatlined at around 70 percent. American college attendance roses, though college graduation rates languished. The upshot is that while the average college graduates in 1970 earned 45 percent more than high school graduates, the differential three decades later exceeds 80 percent.
"In the first half of the century," the authors summarize, "education raced of technology, but later in the century technology raced ahead of educational gains."
Proving that the demand for and supply of educated workers began not in the time of Bill Gates but in the era of Thomas Edison is virtuoso social science. But wasn’t a slowdown in rising educational attainment unavoidable? After all, it’s one thing to increase the average years of schooling by leaps and bounds when most people start near zero, but quite another when national average is already high.
The authors reject the idea that the United States has reached some natural limit in educational advances. Other countries are now at higher levels.
What, then, is holding American youth back?
The authors give a two-part answer. For one thing, the financial aid system is a maze. More important, many people with high school diplomas are not ready for college.
The second problem, the authors write, is concentrated mostly in inner-city schools. Because the poor cannot easily move to better school districts, the authors allow that charter schools as well as vouchers, including those for private school, could be helpful, but more evaluation is necessary.
Data on the effects of preschool are plentiful, and point to large returns on investment, so the authors join the chorus in extolling Head Start, the federal government’s largest preschool program.
Providing more children with a crucial start, along with easier ways to find financial aid, are laudable national objectives. One suspects, though, that the obstacles to getting more young people into and through college have to do with knotty social and cultural issues.
But assume that the author’s policies would raise the national college graduation rate. Would that deeply reduce inequality?
Averages can be deceptive. Most of the gains of the recent flush decades have not gone to the college-educated as a whole. The top 10 or 20 percent by income have education levels roughly equivalent to those in the top 1 percent, but the latter account for much of the boom in inequality. This appears to be related to the way taxed have been cut, and to the ballooning of the financial industry’s share of corporate profits.
It remains to be seen how a reconfigured financial industry and possible new tax policies might affect the 30-year trend toward greater inequality.
In the meantime, it is nice to be reminded, in a data-rich book, that greater investments in human capital once put Americans collectively on top of the world.
What does the underlined word "laudable" mean?
选项
A、Reasonable.
B、Achievable.
C、Deserving praise.
D、Worth trying.
答案
C
解析
即使不认识这个单词,也可以从这个词语所在的句子推断出它的意思:“为更多的孩子提供一个好的起点,并找到更加简便的方式为他们提供财政资助”这些都是“值得赞扬的”,并且,上一段话中也有对这个单词词义的暗示:“so the authors join the chorus in extolling Head Start”说的也是作者在大唱赞歌,与下文意思相符,因此答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/ICYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WiltChamberlainisretirednow,butheusedtobeafamousbasketballplayer.Hehasset65differentrecordsandevenholdsma
Theivory-billedwoodpecker,ifyouhaven’theard,isnolongerextinct.Inlatespring,agroupof17researchersannouncedin
Americansoftentrytosaythingsasquicklyaspossible,soforsomeexpressionsweusethefirstlettersofthewordsinstead
ItispossibleforstudentstoobtainadvanceddegreesinEnglishwhileknowinglittleornothingabouttraditionalscholarlyme
Historicaldevelopmentsofthepasthalfcenturyandtheinventionofmoderntelecommunicationandtransportationtechnologiesh
Sofar,inflationisroaringinonlyafewsectorsoftheeconomy.Whileplatinumhassoared121percent,soybeanshaverisen11
Sixty-eightpercentofAmerica’swealthisgeneratedbymanufacturing.IftheUnitedStateshopestocontinuetomaintainaposi
Sixty-eightpercentofAmerica’swealthisgeneratedbymanufacturing.IftheUnitedStateshopestocontinuetomaintainaposi
A、upholdthedomesticpoliciesoftheBushAdministration.B、caremoreaboutfamilyvaluesthantheissueofabortion.C、arecon
加入世贸组织,是中国对外开放的新起点。我们将在更大范围和更深程度上参与国际经济合作与竞争。中国将进一步向亚洲和世界开放,向各国的企业家、投资者开放。我们恪守入世承诺,有步骤地扩大开放领域,降低关税水平,取消非关税壁垒。我们也将不断完善法治,创造更加公平、透
随机试题
下列有关肌梭感受器,错误的论述是()。
A.G蛋白偶联受体B.化学门控通道C.电压门控通道D.机械门控通道E.酪氨酸激酶受体神经轴突膜上与动作电位的产生直接有关的蛋白质属于
关于子宫内膜癌,下列哪项正确
患儿男性,出生4天,生后50小时才排少量胎便,呕吐粪便状液体。查体:腹胀,尚软,无固定压痛。肛查拔出指套后有暴发性排气排便。考虑可能的诊断为
血中具有生理作用的钙是
正常妊娠24周末,宫底高度应在
患者,男,49岁。呕吐吞酸,嗳气频繁,胸胁满痛,舌边红,苔薄腻,脉弦。治法为
“政社互动”其全称是“政府行政管理与基层群众自治有效衔接和良性互动”,其内核是:凡村(居)自治事务,放手其自主管理;政府部门行政事务不得随意下派。“政社互动”的意义在于()。
正确地度量服务部门工人的生产率很复杂。例如,考虑邮政工人的情况:如果每个邮政工人平均投递更多的信件,就称他们有更高的生产率,但这真的正确吗?如果投递更多信件的同时每个工人平均丢失或延迟更多的信件会是什么情况呢?以上对量度生产率的方法暗含的反对意见是基于对以
将考生文件夹下PENG文件夹中的文件BLUE.WPS移动到考生文件夹下ZHU文件夹中,并将该文件改名为RED.WPS。
最新回复
(
0
)