首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
admin
2014-06-02
95
问题
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly., all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story. ) In each case investor— mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans—all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a combined banking and currency crisis, a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice; a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long-term assets into cash, but to convert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupts if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probably go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries split the difference—and paid a heavy price regardless.
Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management? Like most cliches, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real: excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure of Asian business also made the economies peculiarly vulnerable to a loss of confidence. But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time.
Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the right track? There was frantic blame-shifting when everything in Asia seemed to be going wrong: now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right. The international Monetary Fund points to Korea’s recovery—and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all—as proof that its policy recommendations were right. Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia—which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls—also seems to be on the mend. MalaYsia’s prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news—even though neighbouring economies also seem to have bottomed out.
The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the policies adopted either on or in defiance of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way. Budget policies, interest rate policies, banking reform—whatever countries tried, just about ali the capital that could flee, did. And when there was no mere money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail. At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner; at worst, they were like medieval physicians who prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills.
Will the patients stage a full recovery? It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level; but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korea’s industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as the Asian norm, they have a long way to go.
At the end of the passage, the writer seems to think that a full recovery of the Asian economy is______.
选项
A、due
B、remote
C、imaginative
D、unpredictable
答案
B
解析
本题为推理题。短文最后一段的最后一句说...they have along way to go.即这些国家(的经济全面复苏)有很长的路要走。故选项B(遥远的)为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/HjpO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Accordingtothenews,whoisSiennaMiller?
WhichofthefollowingisCORRECT?
Whichofthefollowingisthemaincauseofhighfoodprices?
AccordingtoQuisumbing,governmentswouldbewiseto______.
Theperiodofadolescence,i.e.,thepersonbetweenchildhoodandadulthood,maybelongorshort,dependingonsocialexpectat
Attheturnofthe18thand19thcenturies______appearedinEnglandasanewtrendinliterature.
Ifthemaximsofcooperativeprincipleisviolated,______mightoccur.
Manyarticlesandbookshavebeenwritteninrecentyearsaboutcultureinorganizations,usuallyreferredtoas"CorporateCult
Theoceancoversthreequartersoftheearth’ssurface,produces90percentofallitslife-supportingoxygen,andisthedrivin
Inthesummerof1896,Mr.WilliamHolt,awealthymanufacturerofChicago,waslivingtemporarilyinalittletownofcentralNew
随机试题
谈判可行性研究的目的谈判的目的是要就一项或多项涉及各方权利和义务的交易活动达成_________的协议,从而使得有关的交易活动能够按照各方的意图展开,为其利润最大化或扩大市场占有率等目标服务。
《关山月》中表现朝廷对丢失中原态度的诗句是()
什么是药物的生物利用度?
()是项目区别于作业的一个重要特点。
学生借以获得信息、作出计划和解决问题的心理过程称之为______。
《匆匆》节选去的尽管去了,来的尽管来着;去来的中间,又怎(zhenzen)样地匆匆呢?早上我起来的时候,小屋里射进两三方斜斜的太阳。太阳他有脚啊,轻轻悄悄地挪移了;我也茫茫然跟着旋转(zhuan三声,zhuan四声)。于是——洗手的时候,日子从
下列各句句意明确、不存在歧义的是()。
机会总是眷顾有所准备的人,当错失良机时,我们往往()。
下列不属于《中华苏维埃共和国土地法》规定的土地分配具体方法是()。
Manypeopleviewretirementasatimetostopworking.Butnewresearchshowsthatpeoplewhotakeonfull-orpart-timejobsaft
最新回复
(
0
)