首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
admin
2011-01-10
95
问题
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (1) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (2) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (3) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is (4) in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The (5) of member states are said to be (6) the idea and responded positively to a (6) which followed the (8) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (9) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (10) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (11) , a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (12) quickly.
The Irish government’s (13) to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing (14) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to (15) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period." Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (16) but could (17) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (18) approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to (19) ," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (20) of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU.
The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly.
The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated, "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonization of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
选项
答案
proposal
解析
名词。本题考查重点单词的反复出现。本题讨论的话题就是这个proposal,篇首便谈到该词,此处该单词反复出现,以示强调。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/HcuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级口译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级口译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Webelieveourselvestobeuniqueamongnationsinourgenerosityofspiritandourreadinesstoputupwithallkindsofpeople
IfWesternpeoplethinktheyarehealthyeaters,theywillhavetothinkagain.
SomepeopleaccusemeofbeingrudebecauseIalwaysintroducemyselftootherpeopleImeetontrains;butlanswerbytelling
I’veknownseveralpeoplewhohaveovercomenail-bitingsimplybybuying50nailfilesanddistributingthemeverywhere:inthei
Theirhostcarved,poured,served,cutbread,talked,laughed,proposedhealth.
Alibaba,China’secommercegroup,hascontinuedastringofdealsthatisdesignedtostrengthenitsappealaheadofanexpected
EcotourismThinkingaboutgoingoffthebeatenpathforyournextvacation?Ifso,youmightbeoneofthemanypeoplewhoa
AsforthepeoplewhoseeyesstillfindthegreatreasonsbehindthetechnologyofdualSIMphonevague,youcanfindfivereaso
Improvedhumanwell-beingisoneofthegreatesttriumphsofthemodernera.Theageofplentyhasalsoledtoanunexpectedglo
随机试题
猩红热的临床表现不包括
突触前抑制是由于突触前膜
减小偶然误差的方法有
肝硬化病人出现全血细胞减少的最主要原因是
下列哪些行为属于盗窃?(2010年卷二62题,多选)
从标准化的定义可以看出()。
价格歧视是指以不同价格向不同顾客出售同一种物品的经营做法。下列行为中不属于价格歧视的是()。
辐射指的是能量在空间传播的过程。下列关于辐射的说法不成立的是()。
有限责任公司的权力机构是()。
设f(x)在[0,a]上一阶连续可导,f(0)=0,令|f’(x)|=M.证明:|∫0af(x)dx|≤M.
最新回复
(
0
)