首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2009-02-10
84
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U.S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本题询问全文的主要内容。全文讲述了铁道案件及过去和现在人们对此类案件的态度和立场。因此只有D项较为全面准确地概括了全文的内容。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/GQ6K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
MakeThataDoubleAfewyearsago,itdawnedonZachThomasthatcoffeedidn’thaveenoughcaffeine.Atthetime,hewaspul
ThemostimportantthingnowisforDemocratsnottopanic.Despitewhatyourgutistellingyou,thisisnottheendofthewor
AccordingtoOxfordEnglishDictionary,bookis""awrittenorprintedtreatiseorseriesoftreatises,occupyingseveralsheet
ThismonthSingaporepassedabillthatwouldgivelegalteethtothemoralobligationtosupportone’sparents.CalledastheM
(1)Afteralongdayattheoffice,manyofusfindourselvestakingoutourstressonfriends,children,orsignificantothers.
Thefollowingtwoexcerptsareabouttheworthofhighereducationasitscostissoaringanditsrewardisdownsizing.Butther
(1)Thepolicemanonthebeatmoveduptheavenueimpressively.Theimpressivenesswashabitualandnotforshow,forspectators
ThePressConferenceI.AdvantagesofthePressConference—theeventitselfhaving【T1】________
PassageFourWhateffectdoestheironfrombloodcellshaveaccordingtotheresearcher’sexperiment?
Herushedintotheroom,hisface______withsweat.
随机试题
人的本质在于()
关于阻塞性肺气肿,哪一项描述是正确的
胞内信号转导过程的特点包括
A.胎儿先露部的指示点与母体骨盆前、后、左、右、横的关系B.胎儿在子宫内的姿势C.胎儿纵轴与母体纵轴垂直D.胎体纵轴与母体纵轴的关系E.最先进入骨盆入口的胎儿部分胎先露为
妇女月经后期,胸胁胀闷太息,脉弦涩,其病机是()
在嘈杂的环境中人们能够敏感地听见有人喊自己的名字,这是知觉的()。
智力是使人能顺利完成某种活动所必需的各种()的有机结合。
钦定宪法大纲颁布于( )。
社会主义初级阶段的生产力水平和发展的不平衡性,给非公有制经济留下了广阔的空间。在社会主义市场经济中,非公有制经济的作用表现在以下方面
Readthetextbelowaboutpersonalbranding.ChoosethebestwordorphrasetofilleachgapfromA,B,CorD.Foreach
最新回复
(
0
)